God commands us by His prophet not to esteem any new God to be God, and not to worship any strange God
. Now it is clear that that is called new which is not from
everlasting, and on the contrary, that is called everlasting which is
not new. He, then, who does not believe that the Only-begotten God is
from everlasting of the Father does not deny that He is new, for that
which is not everlasting is confessedly new; and that which is new is
not God, according to the saying of Scripture, "there shall not be in
thee any new God ." Therefore he who says that the Son "once was not ," denies His Godhead. Again, He Who says "thou shalt never worship a strange God
" forbids us to worship another God; and the strange God is so called
in contradistinction to our own God. Who, then, is our own God? Clearly,
the true God. And who is the strange God? Surely, he who is alien from
the nature of the true God. If, therefore, our own God is the true God,
and if, as the heretics say, the Only-begotten God is not of the nature
of the true God, He is a strange God, and not our God. But the Gospel
says, the sheep "will not follow a stranger
." He that says He is created will make Him alien from the nature of
the true God. What then will they do, who say that He is created? Do
they worship that same created being as God
, or do they not? For if they do not worship Him, they follow the Jews
in denying the worship of Christ: and if they do worship Him, they are
idolaters, for they worship one alien from the true God. But surely it
is equally impious not to worship the Son, and to worship the strange
God. We must then say that the Son is the true Son of the true Father,
that we may both worship Him, and avoid condemnation as worshipping a
strange God. But to those who quote from the Proverbs the passage, "the
Lord created me
," and think that they hereby produce a strong argument that the
Creator and Maker of all things was created, we must answer that the
Only-begotten God was made for us many things. For He was the
Word, and was made flesh; and He was God, and was made man; and He was
without body, and was made a body; and besides, He was made "sin," and
"a curse," and "a stone," and "an axe," and "bread," and "a lamb," and
"a way," and "a door," and "a rock," and many such things; not being by
nature any of these, but being made these things for our sakes, by way
of dispensation. As, therefore, being the Word, He was for our sakes
made flesh, and as, being God, He was made man, so also, being the
Creator, He was made for our sakes a creature; for the flesh is created.
As, then, He said by the prophet, "Thus saith the Lord, He that formed
me from the womb to be His servant ;" so He said also by Solomon, "The Lord created me as the beginning of His ways, for His works ." For all creation, as the Apostle says, is in servitude
. Therefore both He Who was formed in the Virgin's womb, according to
the word of the prophet, is the servant, and not the Lord (that is to
say, the man according to the flesh, in whom God was manifested), and
also, in the other passage, He Who was created as the beginning of His
ways is not God, but the man in whom God was manifested to us for the
renewing again of the ruined way of man's salvation. So that, since we
recognize two things in Christ, one Divine, the other human (the Divine
by nature, but the human in the Incarnation), we accordingly claim for
the Godhead that which is eternal, and that which is created we ascribe
to His human nature. For as, according to the prophet, He was formed in
the womb as a servant, so also, according to Solomon, He was manifested
in the flesh by means of this servile creation. But when they say, "if
He was, He was not begotten, and if He was begotten He was not," let
them learn that it is not fitting to ascribe to His Divine nature the
attributes which belong to His fleshly origin
. For bodies which do not exist, are generated, and God makes those
things to be which are not, but does not Himself come into being from
that which is not. And for this reason also Paul calls Him "the
brightness of glory
," that we may learn that as the light from the lamp is of the nature
of that which sheds the brightness, and is united with it (for as soon
as the lamp appears the light that comes from it shines out
simultaneously), so in this place the Apostle would have us consider
both that the Son is of the Father, and that the Father is never without
the Son; for it is impossible that glory should be without radiance, as
it is impossible that the lamp should be without brightness. But it is
clear that as His being brightness is a testimony to His being in
relation with the glory (for if the glory did not exist, the brightness
shed from it would not exist), so, to say that the brightness "once was
not
" is a declaration that the glory also was not, when the brightness was
not; for it is impossible that the glory should be without the
brightness. As therefore it is not possible to say in the case of the
brightness, "If it was, it did not come into being, and if it came into
being it was not," so it is in vain to say this of the Son, seeing that
the Son is the brightness. Let those also who speak of "less" and
"greater," in the case of the Father and the Son, learn from Paul not to
measure things immeasurable. For the Apostle says that the Son is the
express image of the Person of the Father
. It is clear then that however great the Person of the Father is, so
great also is the express image of that Person; for it is not possible
that the express image should be less than the Person contemplated in
it. And this the great John also teaches when he says, "In the beginning
was the Word, and the Word was with God
." For in saying that he was "in the beginning" and not "after the
beginning," he showed that the beginning was never without the Word; and
in declaring that "the Word was with God," he signified the absence of
defect in the Son in relation to the Father; for the Word is
contemplated as a whole together with the whole being of God. For if the
Word were deficient in His own greatness so as not to be capable of
relation with the whole being of God, we are compelled to suppose that
that part of God which extends beyond the Word is without the Word. But
in fact the whole magnitude of the Word is contemplated together with
the whole magnitude of God: and consequently in statements concerning
the Divine nature, it is not admissible to speak of "greater" and
"less."
As for those who say that the begotten is in its nature unlike the
unbegotten, let them learn from the example of Adam and Abel not to talk
nonsense. For Adam himself was not begotten according to the natural
generation of men; but Abel was begotten of Adam. Now, surely, he who
was never begotten is called unbegotten, and he who came into being by
generation is called begotten
; yet the fact that he was not begotten did not hinder Adam from being a
man, nor did the generation of Abel make him at all different from
man's nature, but both the one and the other were men, although the one
existed by being begotten, and the other without generation. So in the
case of our statements as to the Divine nature, the fact of not being
begotten, and that of being begotten, produce no diversity of nature,
but, just as in the case of Adam and Abel the manhood is one, so is the
Godhead one in the case of the Father and the Son.
Now touching the Holy Spirit also the blasphemers make the same
statement as they do concerning the Lord, saying that He too is created.
But the Church believes, as concerning the Son, so equally concerning
the Holy Spirit, that He is uncreated, and that the whole creation
becomes good by participation in the good which is above it, while the
Holy Spirit needs not any to make Him good (seeing that He is good by
virtue of His nature, as the Scripture testifies)
; that the creation is guided by the Spirit, while the Spirit gives
guidance; that the creation is governed, while the Spirit governs; that
the creation is comforted, while the Spirit comforts; that the creation
is in bondage, while the Spirit gives freedom; that the creation is made
wise, while the Spirit gives the grace of wisdom; that the creation
partakes of the gifts, while the Spirit bestows them at His pleasure:
"For all these worketh that one and the self-same Spirit, dividing to
every man severally as He will
." And one may find multitudes of other proofs from the Scriptures that
all the supreme and Divine attributes which are applied by the
Scriptures to the Father and the Son are also to be contemplated in the
Holy Spirit:-immortality, blessedness, goodness, wisdom, power, justice,
holiness- every excellent attribute is predicated of the Holy Spirit
just as it is predicated of the Father and of the Son, with the
exception of those by which the Persons are clearly and distinctly
divided from each other; I mean, that the Holy Spirit is not called the
Father, or the Son; but all other names by which the Father and the Son
are named are applied by Scripture to the Holy Spirit also. By this,
then, we apprehend that the Holy Spirit is above creation. Thus, where
the Father and the Son are understood to be, there the Holy Spirit also
is understood to be; for the Father and the Son are above creation, and
this attribute the drift of our argument claims for the Holy Spirit. So
it follows, that one who places the Holy Spirit above the creation has
received the right and sound doctrine: for he will confess that
uncreated nature which we behold in the Father and the Son and the Holy
Spirit to be one.
But since they bring forward as a proof,according to their ideas, of
the created nature of the Holy Spirit, that utterance of the prophet,
which says, "He that stablisheth the thunder and createth the spirit,
and declareth unto man His Christs,
," we must consider this, that the prophet speaks of the creation of
another Spirit, in the stablishing of the thunder, and not of the Holy
Spirit. For the name of "thunder" is given in mystical language to the
Gospel. Those, then, in whom arises firm and unshaken faith in the
Gospel, pass from being flesh to become spirit, as the Lord says, "That
which is born of the flesh is flesh, and that which is born of the
Spirit is spirit
." It is God, then, Who by stablishing the voice of the Gospel makes
the believer spirit: and he who is born of the Spirit and made spirit by
such thunder, "declares" Christ; as the Apostle says, "No man can say
that Jesus Christ is Lord but by the Holy Spirit ."
No comments:
Post a Comment