Fr. Iakovos, Protopsaltis of the Protaton Church, singing together with the students of Athoniada School, Holy Mountain
Once, when I was talking to an Elder 
who’d been on the Holy Mountain for many years (more than twice the 
number I had), he mentioned the following in the course of conversation:
 ‘the late Father E… would always sing this doxastiko [a special 
hymn, sung between ‘Glory…’ and ‘Now and forever’] in the way Iakovos 
set it’. Since anybody who’s interested in Byzantine music knows how 
difficult it is to execute the settings of Iakovos the Protopsaltis (fl.
 ca. 1760-†1800), I was astonished and asked if Father E… knew music. 
The Elder seemed a little embarrassed, as if he hadn’t expected the 
question. He was quiet for a second or two, then said, ‘The Athonite 
kind’. 
What he meant was that he knew more or 
less the settings that were normally sung on the Holy Mountain. And, he 
continued, in an effort to explain more clearly what he’d said and also 
to provide an answer to my question (where the Father had learned and 
knew how to sing the Iakovos setting): ‘That’s how they learned. Each 
one with the others’.
This little exchange encapsulates the 
way Byzantine music was learned and cultivated on the Holy Mountain 
fifty years ago and earlier. This was a time when contact with the 
external world was very limited and, for some monks, virtually 
non-existent. Most monks then came to the Holy Mountain at a very early 
age, and therefore hadn’t been able to study music and hardly had much 
knowledge beyond Elementary School, far less Secondary. The number of 
pilgrims who came was much fewer, and contact with singers and music 
teachers outside Athos would have been quite infrequent. In any case, 
the difficulties involved in getting to Athos didn’t allow for any 
consorting or interaction between the two musical worlds.
I came to Athos in 1993 to live as a 
monk, without any particular experiences from earlier pilgrimages. I was
 fortunate to meet the last elderly monks in the area around my 
monastery, and they had the characteristics I’ve just described. They 
had full, rich voices, thunderous, but very sweet at the same time. 
Their musical knowledge was absolutely specific. What they knew, and 
what they were used to, they sang probably better than anyone. If they 
saw something for the first time, they couldn’t even make a start. The 
chances of correcting them in what they were singing were nil.
The way they’d heard it was the way they sang it, to the end of their lives. But this was the beauty of the katholiko
 [the main church of the monastery]. Everybody expected to sing some 
musical piece with the particular timbre of their voice, and this lent a
 different atmosphere to the katholiko. No sooner had they started than the younger singers would look at each other and smile.
I don’t know that there was any 
systematic teaching. There may have been some preliminary lessons, and 
then the music school would have been the singing itself. Continuous 
singing of the repertoire would have helped the newer monks to learn, 
like apprentices under instruction. They didn’t much look at music in 
books; they’d committed some parts to memory and if, occasionally, they 
lost their way in the setting, they’d supply it from the closest one 
they remembered. Everyone had a right to take part, even those who 
didn’t have much of a voice or had learned from practice. You see, the 
services are so long and so frequent that the good singers can’t sing 
all the time, because they’d soon exhaust themselves.
So, in this way, quite a large part of 
the burden on the Holy Mountain is borne by singers who take the 
‘supporting roles’. Of course, a large part is also undertaken by the 
abbots, and the elders, who sing the ‘pieces of the elders’. So we see 
that large parts of the services, particularly those that are the same, 
are sung by people who aren’t musicians and who, without realizing it, 
also contribute in their own way to the musical expression of the Holy 
Mountain.
Being still new to the monastery, I 
talked to one of the older brothers who told me what happened in a 
hospital to one of the most elderly monks, who was of an exceptionally 
simple nature. During the course of his treatment, a whole host of 
people made their way to the hospital to see him and ask for his 
blessing, and he, for his part, would tell them something for their 
spiritual benefit. I reacted sharply to this. I knew that this 
particular father was, of course, very good and pure, but he was also 
very simple. What could he have to say? The other monk answered that any
 monk who’d spent long years on Athos, however simple he may be by 
nature, whatever education he’d had, would certainly have something to 
say.
Everyday life in a monastery is a 
continuous spiritual education and it’s impossible to live in one 
without picking up some basic things to pass on to other people. It’s my
 impression that something similar is also true of music.
The overwhelming majority of monks who 
come to the Holy Mountain, even if they aren’t given any musical 
training in the monastery, will certainly learn something, either from 
listening or of necessity. Most of them, at some stage will be able to 
lead the choir on the left or the right at a daily service and often 
will be able to sing pieces they’ve learned by ear. The time covered by 
these practical singers at services is very considerable, especially at 
the daily office. I’d go so far as to say that the we should all take 
into consideration the fact that the Athonite style in the faster, 
shorter pieces has, to a large extent, been shaped by such monks.
But it would be wrong not to mention how
 the spiritual life has also had an effect on worship. Many psaltists 
outside Athos would also say this, but on the Holy Mountain they don’t 
just say it; they also apply it. An Athonite psaltist never knows when 
he’ll sing, or even if he’ll sing. He waits to be told by the typikaris (the
 monk in charge of services) before coming up to his place at the 
music-stand in the choir. If there’s a guest psaltist, he is given pride
 of place over the monastery’s own.
Most often, the opportunities for 
choosing settings that will be musically instructive are limited, either
 because the abbot won’t allow it, or because not all the monks would be
 able to sing the chosen setting, which would result in a hiatus that 
the abbot would punish with a commensurate canon (often extra 
prayers and prostrations). Nobody occupies the first place in the 
right-hand choir on a permanent basis. All the Athonite monastery rules 
envisage an exchange of choirs (from left to right and vice versa) 
through the course of the year. Even the first psaltist is often forced 
to bear with musically weaker monks, who, perhaps, aren’t of much help 
to him, but also have the right to play their part.
Naturally, there are also the vigilant 
eyes of the  elders, who will clip the wings of anybody who’s getting 
above himself. They’ll bring him to his senses with an appropriate canon (in
 this case, absence from the choir). From all this we can see that, 
apart from his musical efforts, an Athonite psaltist also has to engage 
in a spiritual struggle if he’s going to overcome all the above 
obstructions in order to use his music for the glory of God rather than 
to puff himself up. I don’t believe there’s a single Athonite psaltist 
who hasn’t said, at some time in his life, especially when he was just 
starting out, ‘I wish I’d never even learned music’.
Of course, as the elders say, these are 
just growing pains and happen to everyone. I confess that I had great 
difficulties in the early years, but my Elder encouraged me by telling 
me that he’d observed that monks who sang had greater grace.
And so, as the years go by, we all 
recognize our true position in the Church and overcome all those 
impediments, although they’re of great benefit to us in our spiritual 
life, particularly as regards the acquisition of greater humility. All 
of this, however, also has an effect on the musical execution of the 
settings. This is why I said above that the spiritual conditions have 
contributed to the shaping of the Athonite style of singing.
Many generations grew up in such 
conditions, and, of course, throughout the whole of Athos there are 
still elderly monks like this. Even the most prominent Athonite 
psaltists were nurtured by the same method. By their continuous presence
 at Church services and with their heightened musical awareness (it’s 
true that the zeal of psaltists in the pursuit of their art is extreme) 
and under the particular conditions of location, time and, in my 
opinion, spirituality, they created the much acclaimed and well-known 
Athonite musical style.
But we ought really to make mention of 
today. The Athonite style that people love is the one that was created 
in the manner I described above. I confess it’s not so long since I came
 to the Holy Mountain and, unfortunately, I didn’t manage to meet all 
the great psaltists of recent decades. But, by coming from the outside 
world with quite a good musical training, I was able to grasp, 
relatively quickly, how musical matters worked here
The truth is that what I see today is 
actually somewhat different from what I described above. Conditions are 
different, so it’s only to be expected that we would have a musical 
outcome different from the familiar Athonite style that we’ve known for 
so many years. This is natural, because conditions have changed. But 
this is not the time or place for such an analysis. For the moment let’s
 cling to the spiritual emotion we derive from the music of the Holy 
Mountain, which we know and which is loved by everyone.
Source-Pemptousia.com
 Psalm 33- I will Bless the Lord Chanted By "The Monks of Simonopetras Monastery" Mount Athos.