Tuesday, 10 December 2013

Γέροντας Άγιος Πορφύριος-Χριστέ το Φως το Αληθινό!

Άγιος Πορφύριος ο Καυσοκαλυβίτης

Τα έργα του Θεού είναι θαυμαστά αλλά δυσθεώρητα κι ανεξιχνίαστα για το σκοτισμένο μυαλό μας. Βλέπουμε το κατά δύναμη από τις Γραφές αλλά κι από την εμπειρία μας ότι ο Κύριος επιτρέπει να μας βρουν αρρώστιες, θλίψεις, στερήσεις, ανομβρίες, πόλεμοι κι επαναστάσεις, είτε σαν τιμωρία για τις αμαρτίες μας είτε προληπτικά, για να μην πέσουμε στην αμαρτία, αλλ’ είτε για να δοκιμάσει την πίστη μας. Γι’ αυτό πρέπει να υποκλινόμαστε ταπεινά στη θεία Του πρόνοια, να υποτασσόμαστε στο θέλημά Του και να τον ευχαριστούμε για το ανείκαστο έλεος Του.Αν παρατηρήσεις προσεχτικά τόσο τη δική σου ζωή όσο και των άλλων, θα διαπιστώσεις με εκπληκτική καθαρότητα και ακρίβεια πως όση προσοχή κι αν δώσει κανείς κι όσα μέτρα κι αν λάβει δε θα μπορέσει να ορίσει τι πρόκειται να γίνει στο μέλλον. Γιατί όλα γίνονται σύμφωνα με την κρίση και το θέλημα του Θεού. Κανέναν δεν μπορείς να ενοχοποιήσεις. Το μόνο που πρέπει να κάνουμε είναι να ταπεινωνόμαστε και να υπομένουμε, διαφορετικά αμαρτάνουμε ενώπιον του Θεού.Στην εποχή μας υπάρχουν περιπτώσεις που ίσως δεν μπορούμε να κάνουμε ακριβώς αυτό που θέλουμε. Κανένας όμως δε βρίσκεται να ρωτήσει: «Τι πρέπει να κάνω τώρα;» αν δεν υπάρχει κανένας να συμβουλευτούμε τότε πρέπει να σκεφτούμε πως θα ενεργούσε ο Κύριός μας με την ταπείνωση και την πραότητά Του. Οι εντολές του Θεού ήταν και θα είναι πάντοτε το θεμέλιο της ζωής μας. Γι΄ αυτό πρέπει να εμπιστευτείς τον εαυτό σου στο θέλημά Του.
Προτού κάνεις οτιδήποτε, να προσευχηθείς και να σκεφτείς: Αυτό που πάω να κάνω θα είναι φρόνιμο, θα φανεί ευάρεστο στο Θεό;
« Όταν βρείς τον Χριστό, σου αρκεί, δεν θέλεις τίποτε άλλο, ησυχάζεις. Γίνεσαι άλλος άνθρωπος. Ζεις παντού, όπου υπάρχει Χριστός. Ζεις στα άστρα, στο άπειρο, στον ουρανό με τους αγγέλους, με τους Αγίους, στη γη με τους ανθρώπους, με τα φυτά, με τα ζώα, με όλους, με όλα. Όπου υπάρχει η αγάπη στον Χριστό, εξαφανίζεται η μοναξιά. Είσαι ειρηνικός, χαρούμενος, γεμάτος. Ούτε μελαγχολία, ούτε αρρώστια, ούτε πίεση, ούτε άγχος, ούτε κατήφεια, ούτε κόλαση».
Γέροντας Πορφύριος

Πηγή:churchofagianapa

The Taxing of Souls by Metropolitan Hierotheos Vlachos


Also related to the foregoing is the teaching of both Holy Scripture and the holy Fathers about the taxing of souls. At this point we shall examine the subject thoroughly, as it has a bearing on the terrible mystery of death. We find this topic in the whole biblico-patristic tradition and it corresponds to a reality which we need to look at in order to prepare ourselves for the dreadful hour of death. What follows is written not in order to arouse anxiety, but to prompt repentance, which has joy as its result. For he who has the gift of the Holy Spirit and is united with Christ avoids the terrible presence and activity of the customs demons.
According to the teaching of the Fathers of the Church, the soul at its departure from the body, as well as when it is preparing to leave, senses the presence of the demons who are called customs demons, and is possessed with fear because of having to pass through customs.
Of course we must say from the start that the customs demons have no sovereignty over the righteous, those who have united with Christ. The righteous not only will not go through "customs-houses", but they will also not be in fear of that. We shall see all this better when we compare the teaching of the Fathers. The characterisation of the soul's passage through the demons as customs is taken from the tax collectors of that time. We may look briefly at this subject in order to understand why the Fathers characterise the soul's passage through the demons as customs.
In ancient times the name of tax gatherer was given to those who purchased the public taxes from the State and then collected them from the people" [48]. The tax gatherers were divided into two classes. The first class comprised the so-called "publicans ('confiscators') or tithe collectors", who were the wealthiest class and the force of authority, and the second comprised the "tax collectors". The publicans were the general public collectors, who had bought the taxes from the State, while the tax collectors were their salaried servants, who collected the taxes from the people and gave them to the publicans.
The tax collectors were unjust because they collected larger taxes than had to be paid to their masters. That is why they had a very bad reputation in ancient communities. Plato said that the tax collectors were oppressive, not so much when they collected duties from the visible imports, "but when in looking for what was hidden they meddled in other people's equipment and freight". Therefore when Theocritus was asked what were the fiercest beasts, he answered: "in the mountains, bears and lions, and in the cities, tax collectors and sycophants".
The tax collectors, in their effort to collect as many taxes as they could—and especially in order not to let some people escape who could not accept the very heavy and unjust tax—contrived various means: they would lie in wait in narrow roads and seize passers-by, forcing them to give what they owed. It was very unpleasant and odious to the people of that time.
It is just this familiar and odious image which the Fathers used in order to give the people of that time an understanding of the terrible mystery of death and of the terrible things that unfold when the soul is being prepared for departure, especially when it is leaving the body. St. Macarius of Egypt would say expressively: "Like the tax collectors who sit in the narrow roads and seize the passers-by and the oppressed, so also the demons watch carefully and grab hold of souls. And when they pass out of the body, if they are not completely purified, they are not permitted to go up into the mansions of Heaven there to meet their Master. For they are driven down by the demons of the air" [49].
The image of the tax collectors certainly belongs to the reality of that time. But the teaching that the demons try to seize a man's soul at its departure is mentioned in many texts of Holy Scripture and of the Fathers of the Church. We have already seen that after death the souls of the righteous are received by the angels and the souls of sinners and the unrepentant are received by the demons. With the malice which all the demons have against men, they would like to dominate everyone and have them in their power for ever. But they cannot have authority over the righteous.
A basic passage which the Fathers of the Church interpret as referring to the customs demons is what Christ said shortly before His Passion: "for the ruler of this world is coming, and he has nothing in me" (John 14, 30). The ruler of this world is the devil. He is called the ruler of the world not because he is really the ruler and final authority in the whole world, but because he dominates the world of the unjust. Christ declares that the devil has no authority over Him. He is surely referring here to the devil and death.
St. Paul, referring to the spiritually dead who were deprived of the grace of God, writes: "And you He made alive, who were dead in trespasses and sins, in which you once walked according to the ways of this world, according to the prince of the power of the air, the spirit who is now at work in the sons of disobedience" (Eph. 2, 1-2). This passage indicates that men are deadened by sins and the work of the devil.
Likewise the devil is characterised as the prince of the power of the air because he is in the atmosphere and is constantly waging war on men. It is precisely this image which the Fathers have in view, saying that when the soul leaves the body and passes through the air towards heaven, it meets the ruler of the air. The passage also mentions that this ruler is working now too in the sons of disobedience.
There are many passages in the Old Testament which the Fathers use to indicate what is called the souls' payment of customs duties. I should like to mention two of them. One comes from a psalm of David in which the Prophet King speaks to God and says: "0 Lord my God, in you I put my trust; save me from all those who persecute me; and deliver me, lest they tear me like a lion and rip me to pieces, with no one to rescue me" (Psalm 7, 1-2). The other passage is in the book of the Prophet Jeremiah, where it says: "there seemed to be a fire burning in my bones; I was wearied and could not endure, for I heard many mocking me on every side" (Jer. 20, 9-10).
Now that we have quoted the most basic passages interpreted by the Fathers, we shall go on to their teaching about the "taxing" of souls. We should say that we will first compare their teaching about the taxing and then speak of the mystical interpretation of this condition. As will be seen more clearly in what follows, the souls of the righteous are not in fear, since they have the grace of God, and the demons have no power over them. The souls of the unrepentant are in anguish, being subject to the influence of the demons and to the action of the passions as well. There are demons, but the customs payment also means the action of the passions. We should never forget this point, because to be unaware of it creates false conceptions. The reader of this chapter must be particularly careful in studying the patristic teaching.
St. Basil the Great, interpreting the passage from the Psalms: "save me from all those who persecute me; and deliver me, lest they tear my soul like a lion" (Psalm 7, 2-3), says that the brave men who have struggled throughout their lives against the invisible enemy, towards the end of their lives "will be searched by the ruler of the age" in order to hold them captive if they are found to have wounds or stigmata or imprints of sins. But if they are found uninjured and unstained, then "as they are invincible and free, Christ will give them rest". Therefore he who is under the power of death, since he knows that "One is He who saves, One is He who redeems", cries out to Christ the Saviour: "deliver me in that time of searching, lest they tear my soul like a lion". And Christ, since he was free of sin, said: "now the ruler of this world is coming and he will have nothing in me"; for man, however, it is enough to say that the ruler of the world is coming and he will have "few and small things" in me" [50].
The hour of death is terrible because then the person recalls his sins, but also because he sees frightening things. St. John Chrysostom bears witness that there are many men who recount terrible visions, which the departing one cannot repel. They are so terrible that "his very bed shakes violently, and he gazes in fear at the bystanders".
That is to say, his very body is shaken by his soul's fear, and he makes many disturbed movements. St. John Chrysostom adds that if we are frightened by the sight of terrible men, how much more frightened we will be when at the departure of our soul from the body we see "angels threatening us and stern powers". The soul which is parted from the body wails uselessly, in vain [51].
St. Symeon the New Theologian speaks about this, emphasising especially that he who has God's Light conquers the demons that come near him, for the demons are burnt by the divine Light. This is the case even now, as far as the person is in the vision of God and is clothed in God's Light. It will be much more the case when a person's soul is leaving his body. St. Symeon says that the Christian has no benefit from the spiritual struggle which he is going through if the devil is not set ablaze by the Light of God. And this means that the essence and aim of the spiritual life is to be united with the Light. St. Symeon writes:
"If the prince of darkness, when he comes, does not see Thy glory accompanying me and is not utterly confounded—he, the darkness, consumed by Thy inaccessible Light—and if all the hostile powers with him do not flee on seeing the mark of Thy seal, while I pass through, trusting in Thy grace perfectly intrepid, and approach Thee and bow down what is the use of that which is going on in me now?" [52].
The demons that want to seize a person's soul even at the last moment are characterised by St. Diadochos of Photike as tartar rulers, that is to say, rulers of hades. A person who loves God will not be in fear, for love casts out fear, and he will freely outdistance "the tartar rulers". The soul of a man who rejoices in the love of God, at the hour of death, "is lifted with the angels of peace above all the hosts of darkness" [53].
Thus the holy Fathers are not satisfied just to emphasise the existence of the demons and their aggressive rage against men, but they also emphasise the way in which we can escape their threats. By confessing his sins completely a person is released from cowardice and fear, is filled with the love of Christ, and so he is freed from the evils of the demons. The devil has no power over him.
Abba Isaiah calls the demons which approach the soul when it is leaving the body "rulers of darkness" and "rulers of evil". He teaches that when a man's soul leaves his body, the angels travel with it. But then the powers of darkness also go out to meet it and to dominate it. At that moment the angels do not fight with the demons but wall the person round with the good deeds that he has done. When the person has conquered the demons because of the good deeds which he has done in his life, then "the Angels will rejoice with him when they see him, freed from the powers of darkness". That is why Abba Isaiah exhorts us to love peace, to have love towards men, to think of God and His righteousness, to ignore need for the world and its honour, and so forth [54].
The Sayings of the Desert Fathers contain the teaching of Theophilos the Archbishop on the subject we are dealing with. He says that at the time of departure a court case takes place between the angels and the demons. The demons present "all the sins committed either deliberately or through ignorance from birth to this last hour", and they make accusation against the person. Likewise the angels bring up the good deeds which the soul of the particular person has done. Then the soul under judgement is in great fear. If the demons win, it hears the words: "Take away the ungodly soul, that it may not see the glory of God". But if it comes out the victor and is given freedom, the demons are put to shame and the angels receive the soul and guide it "into that unspeakable joy and glory" [55].
We find these views in many patristic texts. Hesychios the Priest prays that when the ruler of darkness comes, he may find our misdeeds few and petty [56]. He teaches that when the soul has Christ with it, "He will speedily avenge it" [57].
Likewise St. Theognostos says that the righteous soul rises to heaven, going in peace "to meet the radiant and joyful angel that comes down for it and travelling with him unimpeded through the air, totally unharmed by the evil spirits" [58].
The holy Fathers teach all these things not from their imagination, but from enlightening experiences. Sometimes other holy men have revealed these things to them, and at other times they themselves, illumined by God, have had such frightening experiences.
Antony the Great once reached the point of personally seeing such dreadful things. In his cell he went into rapture and then saw himself go out of his body and walk in the air, obviously led by angels. Some bitter and terrible demons prevented them from ascending to heaven and sought a reason for several deeds. Then those leading Antony the Great fought with the terrible demons, saying that God had forgiven him all his deeds from his birth and that they should accuse him only of what he had done from the moment when he became a monk. "Then when they had accused him and not proven him wrong, his way became free and unhindered" [59].
In a dreadful story of Antony the Great the following is told: During the night a voice wakened him and urged him to go out of his cell and look. Then in fact he saw someone "tall, without bodily form and dreadful", who was the devil, standing straight with his hands raised, preventing some from ascending by keeping hold of them, and gnashing his teeth at others because they had escaped and were ascending to heaven. It was revealed to Antony the Great that this dreadful spectacle was "the passage of souls" [60].
St. John of the Ladder describes a terrible spectacle seen by the hermit Stephen, who was an ascetic on Mt. Sinai, near the cave of the Prophet Elijah. On the day before his death, while his eyes were open, he went into ecstasy and began to took to the right and left of his bed. Those present heard him answering as if he were being interrogated. Sometimes he said: "Of course it is true. That was why I fasted for so many years". Or again: "Yes, that is correct, but I wept and served my brothers". Or again: "No. You are accusing me falsely. "Or sometimes: "Quite right. No, I have no excuse. But God is merciful". And St. John of the Ladder adds that "this unseen and relentless interrogation was a truly awful and frightening spectacle". Worst of all was the fact that they accused him of things which he had not done" [61].
From what we have cited it seems that the whole tradition of the Church speaks of the existence of the customs demons, the spirits in the air, which fight a man with hatred and evils not only throughout his life, but especially before and after his soul's departure from the body.
In the tradition of the Church, however, it is seen clearly, that the demons have no mastery over the men of God, because those who have put on God do not go through such a martyrdom. If the ruler of the world has no power over Christ, this is also true of those men who are united with Him. This is why the Fathers advise us to live within the Church, with repentance, confession and spiritual works, that we live and die in the Church with the orthodox faith and the prayers of our Fathers, so that the ruler of darkness and the spirits of evil may not have power over us.
In any case it is a fact that during the soul's departure from the body a great battle goes on, chiefly in people who have insufficient purification. The terrible thing is that many people in our time die without being aware of the shocking hour of death. That is to say, the illnesses of our time, as well as the powerful pharmaceutical culture, distort man's psychosomatic constitution and make it difficult for him to go through these crucial hours with fitting attention, fear of God and prayer. Of course medicines do help us not to feel the pain of our illnesses, but they also alter our whole psychosomatic constitution; they do not allow us to realise what is going on and to seek God's mercy.
These hours are very crucial. This is why all who fear God and have spiritual knowledge of the crucial moments pray to be made aware of the events of that time. It is a real opportunity for the person to repent of all that he has committed, to seek God's mercy. To be watchful at this frightful hour is the most important work. That is why the Church prays for God to deliver us from "sudden death".
But we must look at the existence of the customs houses from two sides. One side is the demons' malice and the other is the existence of passions. In the patristic teaching we find that there is also another interpretation of the customs houses. Without, of course, overlooking the teaching about the existence of the rulers of darkness and the spirits of evil, I would also like us at this point to turn our attention to the mystical teaching of the Fathers of the Church about the customs-houses.
We also said before that when a person's soul is about to leave the body, the memory of the sins which he has committed in his life comes back to him. It is a truly intolerable state. St. John Chrysostom speaks of it. He says that on the last day of a person's biological life "sins contort his soul", they stir up his soul. This refers to passions which "move up from below the heart" [62]. The passions seek satisfaction, but the person cannot respond. It is a terrible state.
This insatiable desire of the soul is intensified even further when the soul is separated from the body. St. Gregory of Nyssa attributes this kind of interpretation to his sister Macrina. He says that as it happens with people who have remained in filthy places for a long period of time, that they are not released from the odiousness of the dirt even if they live in clean air afterwards, the same happens to the soul when it parts from the body. Lovers of the flesh, even if they have turned to the incorporeal and refined life, are unable to free themselves from the carnal odour. Precisely then the soul becomes more materalised and in that way "they are in great distress". St. Gregory adds that if what some people say is true, that the shadowy shapes of the departed are seen in the vicinity of the graves, this is an indication that the soul does not want to be parted from the life of the flesh even after it has left the body. The parable of the Rich Man and Lazarus, in which the Rich Man, finding himself in Hades, seems to be thinking about his relatives, indicates that the souls of lovers of the flesh really cannot part from the passions which constitute the carnal life [63].
We know from the Orthodox Tradition that there are passions of the body and passions of the soul. Since there is unity between soul and body, there is also a relationship between the passions of soul and body. The passions of the soul work through the bodily senses. When the soul is released from the body, it cannot satisfy its passions. Ungratified passions produce intolerable pain and a suffocating condition. They stifle the soul. This is the real hell and a frightful affliction. For this reason the holy Fathers advise us to cleanse our souls from the passions while we are in the present life, so that the soul may be released and freed after its departure. It should be satisfied and attracted to God Himself.
There is also another problem for the soul after its departure from the body. St. Gregory of Nyssa teaches that all nature is attracted to what is like it, to its relatives. So too the soul is drawn towards the divine and is related to it, since man is related to God and contains within himself copies of the archetype. After leaving the body, the soul is light, without any bodily pain, and therefore it is easy and pleasant to proceed towards what attracts it, towards God. But if the soul is held down by material habits and by the nails of the passions, then it undergoes suffering in the way in which the body suffers during earthquakes, when it is not only crushed by the weight of the earth but can also be pierced by various pointed objects which are in the earth [64].
It is just this which constitutes the torment of the soul. It experiences a dreadful bifurcation, we could say. On the one hand, it wants to ascend towards God and unite with Him, since it is His image. On the other hand it is impeded by the passions which riddle, press and torment it. And this view is one part of the interpretation of the holy Fathers concerning the customs houses.
The torment of a soul which is parted from the body is described in a wonderful and realistic way by Abba Dorotheos. He says that during this life the soul is comforted through being distracted by the passions. It can feel great sorrow and dreadful pain, but by means of the body and the passions it can take comfort and ease its pain. In such a melancholic and frightful state the person "is fed, drinks, sleeps, meets and associates with friends", that is to say he is entertained by persons dear to him. Thus he is comforted in part and can more easily forget the deepest problem which worries him. But when the soul leaves the body, "it is alone with its own passions and, in short, is always tormented by them". At this time the soul is burning with the annoyance of the passions, it is distracted by them and cannot be mindful of God. This is a real tragedy, for at this time, because there is no body either, it cannot feel even the slightest comfort.
In what follows Abba Dorotheos takes an astonishing example. Suppose someone was shut up in a dark cell with no food or drink for three days without sleeping or meeting anyone, or psalmodising, or praying, or thinking of God at all. Then he would know "what the passions do to him". Actually in such a situation the soul and the whole man is infuriated. We are assured of this by various people who experience the agony of places of torture and frightful imprisonment. If this is the case even while the soul is linked with the body, how much more so when it has left the body and is isolated with its passions.
Abba Dorotheos also makes use of the image of the sick person with a burning fever. This of course creates many other problems as well, especially if the person has a melancholic and ill-tempered body. The same thing happens with the impassioned soul. "The conflict arising from its own bad habits punishes it all the time, the memory being always embittered, the mutterings of its passions constantly emerging, always burning it and enraging it". If one adds to this torment and suffering of the soul the terrible places of Hell and the demons and the fire and the darkness, and so forth, then one can understand the suffering and torment of the soul after its departure and its sojourn in Hades and Hell".
The things that we have said so far show just what those customs houses are that are spoken of in the patristic texts. On the one hand, they are the passions of the soul which, because of the non-existence of the body, cannot be satisfied, and therefore stifle the soul. On the other hand, they are the evil demons which have gained mastery over passionate people, and it is natural that after the soul's departure they have greater mastery over them. The righteous people, who during their lives have purified their souls and bodies from passions of the soul and body and have been clothed in the pledge of the Spirit and united with God, escape the power of the customs houses, since the demons have no power over them. The souls of the righteous are led, free and undistracted, towards God, with whom they are united.
So the whole problem is not to be afraid of the customs demons, but as long as we live, to cure our soul and our whole being of passions, to partake of the uncreated grace of God, so that the departure of our soul from our body may be a matter of joy and delight.
Of course there are some who maintain that such notions as customs houses and aerial spirits have come into Christianity from Gnostic theories and pagan myths which prevailed during that period.
There is no doubt that such views can be found in many Gnostic texts, in pagan ideas which are found in Egyptian and Chaldaean myths. However it must be emphasised that many Fathers adopted the teaching about customs houses, but they cleared it of idolatrous and Gnostic frames of reference and placed it in the ecclesiastical atmosphere. The holy Fathers were not afraid to do such creative work.
It is a fact that the Fathers were working creatively and productively when they took many views and theories from the pagan world, but gave them an ecclesiastical content. It is well known that the Fathers took the teaching about the immortality of the soul, about the ecstasy of man and the dispassion of the soul and body, the teaching about the tripartite soul and many other things from the ancient philosophies, as well as from ancient traditions, but clearly they gave them another content and a different perspective. We cannot discard the teaching about the immortality of the soul just because the ancient philosophers spoke of it. We must look at the content which the holy Fathers gave to it.
Therefore what happened to other topics happened also to the subject of the customs houses. It is true that ancient traditions and heretical views spoke of "rulers of the astral sphere", about "gates of an astral journey", about "aerial spirits", and so forth. We find several of these phrases in the Bible and in patristic texts. As we have mentioned in this chapter, many Fathers of the Church speak of customs houses and aerial spirits, but they have given them different content and different meanings. The patristic teaching about customs houses must be interpreted within the following four points.
First. The symbolic language of the Bible requires the necessary interpretation. Anyone who only keeps to the images used distorts the Gospel message. For instance, we must say that words in the Bible can be misinterpreted if we only look at their theological meaning. The same thing is true in the case of the customs houses. We should not be thinking only of today's customs houses, through which everyone has to pass at the national borders. The symbolic image is intended to present something, but it must be interpreted in an orthodox way.
Second. There are demons, which are dark angels. They are persons and therefore have freedom, and with God's permission, but also through the wrong use of freedom by man, they have been able to dominate him. That is to say, after the soul's departure from the body, the demons demand to possess a soul which they have mastered because of its unrepentance. In Christ's well-known parable about the foolish rich man there is the sentence: "Fool! This night your soul will be required of you; then whose will those things be which you have provided?". According to the patristic interpretation it is the demons who demand possession of the soul of the foolish rich man after its departure from the body.
Third. The demons have no authority over the men of God. All who are united with God and have within their soul and heart the uncreated energy of God are outside the control of the demons. So the deified will not go through the so-called customs houses.
Fourth. According to the teaching of the Fathers, as we have seen before, the demons, which are real spirits, act by means of the passions. The fact that the passions cannot be gratified after the soul's departure from the body is a suffocation of the soul.
When we examine the customs houses in these theological frames, the use of this teaching is not inappropriate. But if we have other conceptions, we are on the wrong path.

Endnotes

48. See extended analysis in G. Konstantinou: Dictionary of holy Scriptures, ed. Grigori, op. 966 (Gk).
49. Macarius of Egypt: Homily 43, 9, CWS p. 222.
50. Basil the Great: Homily on Psalm 7, 2. PG 29, 232B, D.
51. John Chrysostom: Homily 44 on Matthew, EPE 11, p. 170 (Gk).
52. SC 174, p. 310.
53. Diadochus of Photiki: On spiritual knowledge, 100, Philokalia 1, p. 295.
54. Evergetinos, op. cit. p. 101f.55. Ibid. p. 102f.
56. Hesychios: On watchfulness and holiness 161, Philok. 1, p. 190.
57. Ibid 149, p. 188.
58. Theognostos: On the practice of the virtues 61, Philok. 2, p.
59. Evergetinos, op.,cit. p. 99.
60. Ibid. p. 100.
61. John of the Ladder: Step 7, CWS p. 142.
62. John Chrysostom: Homily 44 on Matthew, EPE 11, p. 168 (Gk).
63. Gregory of Nyssa: On the Soul and the Resurrection, Ch. 6, SVS p. 76.
64. Ibid. p. 83.
65. Dorotheos: Discourse 12, Fear of punishment, CS 33, p. 183f.
From Life After Death, by Metropolitan Hierotheos of Nafpaktos, trans. Esther Williams (Levadia, Greece: Birth of the Theotokos Monastery, 1995), pp. 62-80.

Webmaster Note

The charge of "Gnosticism" is exactly what is leveled against those Orthodox writers today who faithfully uphold the tradition of the aerial toll-houses. It would be one thing for a Protestant critic to level such an accusation; but for Orthodox to make the same claims is truly sorrowful. What follows is an extended quote from The Hellenic-Christian Philosophical Tradition, by Dr. Constantive Cavarnos (Belmont, MA: Institute for Byzantine and Modern Greek Studies, 1989), pp. 17-21. The quote within this passage is from St. Basil's To Young Men, on How They Might Profit from Greek Literature, sect. IV and V; cf. 1 Thess. 5:21. I have included this here to demonstrate, in relation to another theological topic, the spurious nature of these accusations. For further insight into this see "Answer to a Critic," by Fr. Seraphim of Platina.
The presence of Platonic notions and terms is so noticeable in the writings of Gregory of Nyssa, a brother of St. Basil, that he has been called by some a "Christian Platonist." Two later Church Fathers—John Damascene, who flourished during the first half of the eighth century, and Photios the Great, who lived in the next century—have been characterized by some as "Christian Aristotelians." This has been occasioned by the fact that both wrote substantial chapters on the Categories and the Predicables of Aristotle. But a careful reading of the whole body of their works shows that they made much greater use of Plato’s writings than of Aristotle’s, particularly in their discussions of God and the human soul. With regard to Photios, it is very significant that in his Lexicon of ancient Greek words, entitled Lexeon Synagoge, there are far more references to Plato than to Aristotle. In listing words used by Plato, Photios often names the Platonic works in which they appear. He mentions altogether fifteen dialogues.
Moreover, in one place he speaks of Plato as "great" (ho megas Platon), but he nowhere uses this highly honorific word for Aristotle. On the basis of such internal evidence, there would seem to be a justification for calling Damascene and Photios "Platonists," rather than "Aristotelians." Actually, the use of either of these terms for them is inappropriate, a serious error, as it is when applied to Justin Martyr, Basil the Great, Gregory of Nyssa, or any other of the Greek Church Fathers. For the foundation of their thought is neither Platonism nor Aristotelianism, nor some other secular system of thought, but is Christian revelation. This very important fact is noted frequently by the Greek Fathers from the earliest to the latest. Thus the fourteenth century Father Gregory Palamas, Archbishop of Thessaloniki, says: "Whence did we learn about God, whence about the universe, whence about ourselves something certain and free of error? Is it not from the teaching of the Spirit?"
The adoption of certain notions and terms from Plato, Aristotle, and other pagan writers does not make the Greek Church Fathers adherents of such writers. They would have had no objection to being called simply "philosophers." For they call Christianity "philosophy," "the divine philosophy," and characterize serious reflection on some problem or topic, such as those they engaged in, "philosophizing." But none of them called himself or any other of their learned Christian predecessors a "Platonist," an "Aristotelian," a "Christian Platonist," or a "Christian Aristotelian." Such characterizations were for them unthinkable. They were unthinkable because they would have been untrue, for the foundation of their thought was, as we have noted, neither Platonic nor Aristotelian, but Christian. Although they did use many elements from Plato and Aristotle, they chose those elements that did not contradict revealed teaching, but were in harmony with it and helped express or illustrate its content. In other words, their use of pagan philosophy was not a wholesale, slavish one. It was a very selective or "eclectic" use, which left them quite free to criticize the errors of secular philosophy. Material for this eclecticism was provided for them not only by the writings of Plato and Aristotle, but also by those of the Stoics and other Greek philosophers and, further, by ancient Greek poets, historians, and orators. The following remark by St. Basil is very illuminating in this connection: "Since it is through virtue that we must enter upon this life of ours, and since much has been uttered in praise of virtue by poets, much by historians, and much more still by philosophers, we ought especially to apply ourselves to such literature."
The guiding principle for this eclecticism was put forth by Basil and used by the other Christian philosopher-theologians or Church Fathers of the East. Basil advised: Take from heathen books whatever befits the Christian and is allied to the truth, and pass over the rest. The model to be used is the bee. "Altogether after the manner bees," says Basil, "must we use these writings, for the bees do not visit all the flowers without discrimination nor indeed do they carry away entire those upon which they light, but rather, having taken so much as is adapted to their needs, they let the rest go." . . .
One reason why the Greek Fathers selected and adapted such elements was because they found them very helpful for formulating in clear and precise form the content of the Christian faith. Another reason was the fact that the use of philosophical terms and concepts would attract to the faith the more educated among the pagans—those who had received instruction in philosophy. For these reasons, too, they chose as their language not the common Greek, the koine, but Attic Greek, using as their models particularly such great masters of Attic prose as Plato, Aristotle, Demosthenes, and Thucydides. From Plato, they took many philosophical elements, modified them to a greater or lesser extent, and assimilated them organically in the Christian teaching.

Source-orthodoxinfo.com/death/soul_taxing.aspx

Θέλουμε τὴν μαγεία ἢ τὴν χαρὰ τῶν Χριστουγέννων;


Περιμένουμε μὲ λαχτάρα τὰ Χριστούγεννα.

Ἆραγε, πῶς θέλουμε νὰ τὰ ἑορτάσουμε; Κοσμικὰ ἢ πνευματικά; Ἐξαρτᾶται ἀπό τὸ τί τελικὰ ζητᾶμε. Τὴν μαγεία τους, γιὰ τὴν ὁποία τόσα πολλὰ κάνει ἡ «διεθνὴς τῶν πονηρῶν» ἢ τὴν χαρὰ τους, ὅπως θέλει ἡ Ἐκκλησία μας; Ἀλλ΄ ἂς πάρουμε τὰπράγματα μὲ τὴν σειρά τους…
Ἀσφαλῶς τὰ Χριστούγεννα ἔχουν νόημα βαθύτατα πνευματικό, ἅγιο καὶ σωτήριο. Γιατί μ’ αὐτὰ δὲν ἑορτάζουμε ἕνα ὁποιοδήποτε γεγονός, ὡς καὶ ἐθνικὸ ἀκόμη, ἀλλὰ τὴν ἴδια τὴν ἐμφάνιση, μὲ σάρκα καὶ ὀστᾶ τοῦ Θεοῦ στὴν γῆ κι ἀνάμεσά μας. Μᾶς τίμησε ἰδιαίτερα μὲ τὴν ἐπίσκεψή Του αὐτή, ὑπέροχα, ἀνυπέρβλητα, μοναδικά, καθὼς ἕνωσε τὴν δική μας ἀνθρώπινη φύση μὲ τὴν δική Του τὴν Θεϊκή. Ἔτσι ἔχουμε τὴν ἐμφάνιση τοῦ Θεανθρώπου στὴν ἱστορία. Τὴν ἕνωση τοῦ κτιστοῦ πλάσματος, μὲ τὸν ἴδιο τὸν Ἄκτιστο Πλάστη καὶ Θεό. Σκοπὸς δὲ αὐτῆς τῆς Θείαςπαρέμβασης, εἶναι ἡ Θέωση τοῦ ἀνθρώπου.Ὁπότε μὲ τὰ Χριστούγεννα δὲν κάνουμε τίποτ’ ἄλλο τελικά, ἀπ’ τὸ νὰ ζοῦμε τὴν ἀνάδημιουργία μας, τὴν ἀνάπλασὴ μας ἀπ’ τὸ κατάντημα, στὸ ὁποῖο μᾶς ὁδήγησε ἡ ἁμαρτία, ὥστε νὰ ἐπανέλθουμε πάλι στὴν προτέρα μας κατάσταση. Νὰ γιατί τὸ μήνυμα τῶν Χριστουγέννων εἶναι τὸ πλέον χαρμόσυνο καὶ τόσο ἐλπιδοφόρο ἄγγελμα τῆς ἱστορίας. Καὶ δὲν εἶναι ἄλλο, ἀπ αὐτὸ τοῦ ἀγγέλου κατὰ τὴν Γέννηση τοῦ Χριστοῦ πρὸς τοὺς ποιμένες: «Εὐαγγελίζομαι ὑμῖν χαρὰν μεγάλην, ἥτις ἔσται παντὶ τῷ λαῷ, ὅτι ἐτέχθη ὑμῖν σήμερον σωτήρ, ὃς ἐστι Χριστὸς Κύριος, ἐν πόλει Δαυίδ» (Λουκ. β΄,11). Δηλαδή, σᾶς ἀναγγέλλω χαρὰ μεγάλη, ἡ ὁποία θὰ εἶναι γιὰ ὅλο τὸν λαό, ὅτι γεννήθηκε σήμερα γιὰ σᾶς στὴν πόλη τοῦ Δαυίδ, σωτήρας, ὁ ὁποῖος εἶναι ὁ Χριστὸς ὁ Κύριος.
Συνεπῶς, ὅταν ἀποδίδουμε στὰ Χριστούγεννα τὸ πραγματικό τους νόημα, κι ὅταν τὰ ἑορτάζουμε ὅπως πρέπει, δηλαδὴ πνευματικά, τότε ἐπιτυγχάνεται καὶ ὁ μέγας σκοπὸς τῆς ἐνανθρωπήσεως τοῦ Θεοῦ, δηλαδὴ ἡ ἕνωσή μας μὲ Αὐτόν, ἡ Θέωσή μας καὶ καταργεῖται τὸ ἔργο τοῦ διαβόλου, ἀκυρώνονται τὰ σκοτεινὰ σχέδια του, ἀπομονώνεται, χάνεται ἀπʼ τὴν ζωή μας!
* * *
Εἶναι ἑπόμενο, λοιπόν, ὅπως πολέμησε τοῦ Χριστοῦ τὴν γέννηση ὡς γεγονότος (ἀπ’ τὸ νὰ μὴ βρίσκεται πανάρετη γυναίκα, γιὰ νὰ ἀξιωθεῖ νὰ γίνει μητέρα Του, πράγμα ποὺ ἔγινε τελικὰ μὲ τὴν Παναγία, ὡς τοὺς διωγμοὺς μὲ τὴν σφαγὴ τῶν νηπίων ἀπʼ τὸν Ἡρώδη), ἔτσι καὶ τὴν πολεμᾶ ἀδιάκοπα ἔκτοτε ὡς ἑορτῆς. Πάρα πολλὰ ἔγιναν στὸ πέρασμα τῶν αἰώνων, ποὺ δὲν εἶναι δυνατὸ νὰ ἐξιστορήσουμε. Μόνο δυὸ λόγια θὰ ἀναφέρουμε καὶ κάποια ἁπλὰ παραδείγματα.
Ἄλλοι ἔγραψαν μυθολογίες γιὰ τὰ Χριστούγεννα, ἄλλοι τὰ παρερμήνευσαν γιατί δὲν θέλησαν νὰ τὰ βιώσουν κι ἄλλοι προσπάθησαν νὰ τὰ καταργήσουν μὲ κρατικὲς διαταγές, μία τακτικὴ ποὺ ὀνομάστηκε «Ἡρωδισμός»!
Πολλὰ ἔκαναν ἐπ’ αὐτοῦ οἱ αἱρέσεις (ὅπως ἡ φοβερότερη ὅλων ὁ Δοκητισμός, ὁ Μονοφυσιτισμὸς κ.λπ.), διάφοροι φιλόσοφοι (ὅπως ὁ Ἀνσέλμος τὸν 11ο αἰώνα), πολλοὶ ἄθεοι κι ἐχθροί τῆς Πίστης (ὅπως ὁ Ἰουλιανὸς ὁ Παραβάτης) κ.λπ. Τὸν περασμένο αἰώνα στὴν κομμουνιστικὴ ΕΣΣΔ (Ρωσία κλπ.) εἶχαν ἀπαγορευτεῖ τὰ Χριστούγεννα ἀπὸ τὸ 1917 μέχρι τὰ τέλη τῆς δεκαετίας τοῦ ᾽80, ὁπότε καὶ κατέρρευσε τὸ καθεστώς! Ὅταν δὲ κυβερνοῦσε ὁ Στάλιν, τὰ Χριστούγεννα εἶχαν ἀντικατασταθεῖ ἀπὸ τὰ… Σταλινούγεννα, μὲ τὴν ἑορτὴ δηλαδὴ τῆς δικῆς του γέννησης!
Ἀλλʼ ἡ χειρότερη πολεμικὴ ὅλων, εἶναι αὐτὴ τῆς ἐκκοσμίκευσης τῶν Χριστουγέννων! Πρόκειται γιὰ ἕνα ἑορτασμὸ ὄχι πνευματικό, ὅπως τὸν ἀναφέραμε, ἀλλὰ κοσμικό, ἐντελῶς κοσμικὸ ὅσο γίνεται… Ἕνα τρόπο ποὺ μεταβάλλει τὸ μέγα ὑπερκόσμιο γεγονός, σὲ ἐγκόσμιο καὶ καθαρὰ ὑλιστικό! Οὔτε λόγος νὰ γίνεται γιὰ πνευματικὴ προετοιμασία, δηλαδὴ νηστεία, μετάνοια, ἐξομολόγηση, Θεία Κοινωνία, προσευχή, Θεία Λειτουργία, ἀλλὰ καὶ ἔμπρακτη ἀγάπη, συγχωρητικότητα, καλοσύνη, ἐλεημοσύνη καὶ στοργὴ στὸν συνάνθρωπο, γιὰ σκέψεις καὶ ἀποφάσεις πνευματικές. Λόγος νὰ γίνεται μονάχα γιὰ τὰ ρεβεγιόν, τὰ στολίδια, τὰ φαγητά, τὰ γλέντια, τοὺς χορούς, τὰ ξενύχτια, τὰ ταξίδια καὶ μάλιστα τὰ ἐξωτικά, τὰ δῶρα, τὶς χαρτοπαιξίες, τὰ πάσης μορφῆς θεάματα καὶ διασκεδάσεις, τὶς κάθε εἴδους ἀπολαύσεις καὶ ἡδονές! Ὅλα τους τόσο κοσμικά, ὅλα τους ἀντιπνευματικά, ὅλα τους πτυχὲς τῆς «ὡραίας ζωῆς», καὶ ὄχι τῆς Οὐράνιας Ζωῆς, ποὺ ζητᾶ ἀπὸ μᾶς ὁ Χριστός. Καμμία σχέση μὲ τὸν «Θεοπρεπῆ» ἑορτασμό, ὅπως τὸν προσδιορίζει ἡ Ἐκκλησία. Φθάσαμε νὰ κατανοοῦμε πὼς ἔρχονται Χριστούγεννα, ἀπὸ τὶς στολισμένες βιτρίνες τῶν ἐμπόρων, ἀπὸ τὰ φωτάκια, ποὺ ἀναβοσβήνουν στὸ μπαλκόνι τοῦ διπλανοῦ μας, ἀπ’ τὰ ἔλατα, ποὺ πωλοῦνται στοὺς δρόμους, ἀπὸ κάποιες προσκλήσεις σὲ γεύματα καὶ τὰ λεγόμενα «ἑορταστικὰ» προγράμματα τῆς τηλεόρασης, δηλαδὴ ἀπὸ τῆς ἐκδηλώσεις τοῦ κόσμου…
Ὅποτε μιλᾶμε γιὰ ἀπολυτοποίηση τῆς ὕλης, γιὰ τὴν ἄκρατη κοσμικότητα, γιὰ τὴν ἀπόρριψη κάθε πνευματικῆς πλευρᾶς τῶν πραγμάτων, μιλᾶμε γιὰ Χριστούγεννα χωρὶς Χριστό! Γιὰ ἕνα «πνεῦμα Χριστουγέννων» ὅπως λένε «μαγικό», δηλαδὴ δαιμονικό! Τὰ ὑλικὰ ἀγαθά, μὲ λογικὴ καὶ μέτρο καὶ στὸβαθμὸ ποὺ μᾶς εἶναι ἀπαραίτητα, δὲν τὰ ἀπορρίπτουμε βέβαια. Ὅμως ἕπονται, δὲν προηγοῦνται, οὔτε καὶ ἀπολυτοποιοῦνται στὴ ζωή μας. Ἡ ἀπάντηση τοῦ Χριστοῦ στὸν Σατανᾶ, ποὺ τὸν πείραζε στὴν ἔρημο, τούτη ἦταν: «Οὐκ ἐπʼ ἄρτῳ μόνῳ ζήσεται ἄνθρω πος…». Χόρτασε, ἐκεῖ στὴν ἔρημο πάλι, τοὺς «πεντακισχίλιους» ἀλλὰ καὶ τοὺς «τετρακισχίλιους», ἀφοῦ γεύτηκαν πλήρως καὶ ἐπὶ ἡμέρες τὰπνευματικὰ ἀγαθὰ, ἀλλὰ καὶ τὴν ἴδια Του τὴν παρουσία, δηλαδὴ ἀφοῦ Τὸν γεύτηκαν πλήρως. Κι αὐτὰ τὰ ὑλικὰ ἀγαθὰ ἦταν στὸ βαθμὸ καὶ τὸ εἶδος ποὺ ἔπρεπε. Τίποτ’ ἄλλο! Μέσα σ’ αὐτὴ τὴ λογικὴ δὲν εἶναι δομημένα καὶ τὰ δικά μας Ἑλληνορθόδοξα ἔθιμα;
Ὁ Ἐ. Μορὲν στὸ βιβλίο του «Πνεῦμα τῶν καιρῶν» ἀναφέρει πολὺ εὔστοχα: «Ἡ ζωὴ δὲν μπορεῖ νὰ καταναλώσει τὰ πάντα καὶ ἡ καταναλωτικὴ κοινωνία δὲν μπορεῖ οὔτε καὶ θὰ μπορέσει ποτὲ νὰ δώσει τὰπάντα»! Συνεπῶς τί ἀπαιτεῖται;
* * *
Τὸ πράγμα δὲν εἶναι καθόλου ἁπλό! Γιατί σήμερα, κατὰ τρόπο ἀπόλυτα ὀργανωμένο καὶ μὲ πολὺκομπασμό, ἐπιχειρεῖται τόσο μὲ τὴν «Παγκοσμιοποίηση» ὅσο καὶ τὴν κίνηση τῆς «Νέας Ἐποχῆς», ποὺ τὴν προωθεῖ παντοῦ, ἡ προβολὴ εἰδωλολατρικῆς ἀτμόσφαιρας στοὺς ἑαυτούς μας, στὰ σπίτια μας καὶ τὶς κοινωνίες μας καὶ ἡ καθιέρωση τῆς ἀντίληψης πὼς ὁ Χριστὸς δὲν εἶναι ὁ Σωτήρας μας! Νὰ γιατί αὐτοὶποὺ πέφτοντας θύματα σ’ αὐτὴ τὴ διαδικασία, χάνουν τελείως τὸ νόημα τῆς ἑορτῆς, δὲν τὰ ἑορτάζουν πνευματικὰ, ἀλλ’ ἐντελῶς κοσμικά, ὁπότε καὶ στὸ τέλος δὲν νοιώθουν τὴ χαρὰ τῶν Χριστουγέννων,ἀλλὰ τὴν μελαγχολία καὶ τὴ θλίψη. Θὰ δοῦμε καὶ ἐφέτος τὶς ἐφημερίδες νὰ ἔχουν τίτλους σὰν αὐτούς: «Ἡ μελαγχολία τῶν γιορτινῶν ἡμερῶν», «Πῶς νὰ ἀποφύγετε τὴ μελαγχολία τῶν ἑορτῶν», «ΤὰΧριστούγεννα τῆς μελαγχολίας», «Ἑορταστικὴ κατάθλιψη» κ.λπ.!
Λοιπόν, ἂς προετοιμαστοῦμε ὅσο καλύτερα γίνεται γιὰ τὰ πνευματικὰ Χριστούγεννα. Μᾶς εἶναιἀπαραίτητη ἡ εὐφροσύνη τους. Τότε θὰ δοῦμε μέσα μας νὰ γεννιέται ὁ Χριστός…ΧΡΙΣΤ

(Περισσότερα βλέπετε στὸ βιβλίο “ΟΧΙ ΣΤΑ ΧΡΙΣΤΟΥΓΕΝΝΑ ΤΗΣ ΠΑΓΚΟΣΜΙΟΠΟΙΗΣΗΣ ΚΑΙ ΤΗΣ Ν. ΕΠΟΧΗΣ”)
Κ. Γ. Παπαδημητρακόπουλος
Ορθόδοξος Τύπος, 21/12/2012

Monday, 9 December 2013

Metropolitan Anthony of Sourozh-CHRIST, TRUE AND PERFECT MAN


The Incarnation, the fact that God became Man, is a revelation both of God and of Man. In order to understand, therefore, how fully man is revealed through the Incarnation, one must rediscover how fully God is revealed. The gods of antiquity, of philosophical discourse, were always images of the greatness of man or of the greatness which man could perceive or imagine in a superhuman being. What no religion, no philosophy, ever dared present was a god who becomes man, suffers and empties himself of his splendour in order to become fully and completely accessible to us. In the Incarnation we discover that our God, the Holy One of Israel, the Creator of the world, the Beauty that surpasses all beauty, the Truth and the only Reality of the world, - that this God chooses, in an act of love, so to identify himself with the destinies of mankind, so to take upon himself total and ultimate responsibility for his creative act, that all the beauty of the world is called forth, while at the same time he gives the world the freedom that destroys and distorts this beauty. This God who chooses to become frail, vulnerable, defenceless and contemptible in the eyes of all those who believe only in strength, in power and in visible temporal victory - such a god a devout, believing man could not have invented. To conceive of a god in such terms would have been blasphemy. And yet. God reveals himself as such: vulnerable, defenceless, frail and contemptible. This is the folly of the Cross of which St Paul speaks. And the folly is not only ours; it is the folly of God as well. A certain number of mystics speak of divine Love as being folly, because to offer love to creatures like us, who may be incapable of responding, who may reject it and trample it underfoot as the swine trample the pearl of great price in the parable, is folly. But then, as St Paul says, the folly of God is wiser than the wisdom of men. If we are to speak of the revelation of man in all his splendour through Christ, we must realise that this can only be accomplished by a God who accepts to become defenceless. Angelus Silesius, the German mystic, says: 'I am as great as God; he is as small as I'. We need to think about what this means. On the other hand, as I have said, the Incarnation is also a revelation of the greatness of man. It is a revelation of the fact that man was created by God in such a way that, not only in spirit, but also in soul and in body, he can be not only spirit-bearing, but God-bearing, He can not only see God face to face, be a friend to God, stand in the deepest possible relation of obedience and communion, but can also, in the daring and inspiring words of St Peter, become a partaker of the divine nature, can become, even while remaining man, what God is in his nature, just as God, being God by nature, becomes man by participation. The union is equally complete - and glorious - in both cases. The Incarnation is not only a revelation of man in his greatness, in his divine potential, it is also a revelation in new terms of the potential of the created physical world. For if the divinity of Christ could unite itself to the body of the Incarnation, it means that the material body of the Incarnation was capable of such unity with God himself - not with the Divine as a notion, not with the Divine as simply a grace of God bestowed upon us - that, with God, it can be truly divinised. If this is true for the body of Christ, then it is true for all the material reality of this world. It means that the words of St Paul, when he says that a day will come when God shall be 'all in all,' must be taken in the most realistic sense. God, the divine Presence, will pervade all things created - all humanity, and all the created world. The world will then become the glorious vesture of God, the body of God, the Incarnation of a God who will always be beyond his world, but who will become immanent to everything in this world, to all he has created. In the sacraments we already have a vision of this very act. When we say that this bread and this wine become the Body and Blood of Christ we see, in eschatological terms, what bread and wine, and all matter represented by them, are called to be: the Body of Christ and the Blood of Christ. Thus the Incarnation gives us not only a historical image of a relationship between God the Saviour and us. It gives us a vast panorama, a vision of what the whole world is called to be in God: 'I in them and thou in me. I in thee, Father, and they in me.' Saint Paul says, our life is already 'hid with Christ in God'. When we think of the Incarnation and of Christ the Man, we must be careful not to fall into the heresy of dividing the Godhead from humanity, of looking at them separately instead of seeing them in their oneness. This oneness was beautifully expressed by St Maximus the Confessor, who says that the union between the humanity and divinity of Christ is like the union of fire and iron that takes place when you plunge a sword of iron into a furnace until it glows with fire. 'Fire and iron,' he says, 'are united now in an indistinguishable way. You can no longer separate the one from the other.' This is the dogma of Chalcedon. Their unity is such that, to use St Maximus' own words, 'one can now burn with iron and cut with fire'. The image of fire and a created object leads us straight into the biblical imagery of God as fire, straight to the God who reveals himself in the burning bush. Father Lev Gillet writes that the fire of God burns only what is evil and does not feed itself on what it sets aflame. It transforms it into a flaming bush without reducing it to ashes. This is what happens in the Incarnation. God, the divine Fire, comes upon a human being, and it is this human entity which is made into a plenitude of Being, without any change in its nature. This takes place in exactly the same way as the bread becomes the Body of Christ and the wine becomes the Blood of Christ in the liturgy. They still remain themselves, because God does not annihilate his creature in the process in order to make it into something else, something essentially different. Incidentally, part of the temptation which the devil offered to Christ was just this. 'You have created stones,' he said, 'now undo your act of creation and make them into bread. You have created bread and wine, undo your act of creation, annihilate their very reality to make them something different'. No. God makes things different by raising them to an eschatological state. In the first prayer of the Canon of the Liturgy we say: 'Thou didst not cease to do all things, until thou hadst brought us up to heaven and bestowed on us thy Kingdom which is to come.' Logically this is absurd. How can we participate now in something which is ahead of us? And yet, this is eschatological reality: things final and decisive are already here, because God has come into the world, and because the world is no longer a world that stands face to face with God. It is a world in which God is immanent, even while he remains the transcendent God. And this is the God in whom we believe. At the end of the ninth chapter of the Book of Job, in verse 33, Job describes his despairing conflict with God and says: 'Neither is there any daysman betwixt us, that might lay his hand upon us both'. There was indeed no one who could take a step that would bring him between the two conflicting parties, between God Almighty and man in his frailty - and simultaneously in his purity of intention and, therefore, in his righteousness. There was no one who could be the equal of both, who could step into the conflict, put his hand on the Lord's shoulder and on man's shoulder, not to divide them, but to bring together what was severed. This is achieved in the Incarnation. In the Incarnation this conflict between God and man becomes a confrontation within one Person, a Person who is simultaneously, and equally, both man and God. In that Person there is a unity which is God and man, the hypostasis of Christ, in which all that is human is confronted with all that is God's so that the conflict is resolved from within by the inner tragedy and victory of the unity between these two. From within the perspective of the Incarnation one can see what the word intercession really signifies. The word intercede means 'take a step' that brings one to the heart of a conflict. That is what Christ does. But at the same time he unites, he brings all the conflict within himself and resolves it there. And this is why, having resolved it within himself, he can resolve it for the whole world, for men, for history and for the cosmos. This way of resolving the conflict involves both the two natures and the two wills. There can be no resolving of this conflict, if Christ is not truly God and truly man in all aspects except sin. But neither can this conflict be resolved unless Christ - the hypostasis - possesses two wills. If the will of God overpowers the will of man, harmony is not restored. If the will of man remains forever independent of the will of God and in a state of confrontation with it, there is again no harmony. It is only because there is in Christ all that is man, including the freedom of man, and all that is God, including the freedom of God, the greatness, the humility, the surrender and kenosis of God, that victory can be won. Two natures are united, and a new Adam is born. Why? When Adam was created he was not created as an individual, as part of an already existing multiplicity of human beings. He was in himself the total humanity of that moment. But at the moment he was not an individual, but a person. There was no dividedness, no fragmentation, no sin, no evil in him. He is completely whole, with the wholeness of innocence, and of saintliness. He knows God, and is known by God, in terms of communion, of knowledge 'face to face', of vision and contemplation. In the Incarnation, Christ is not simply an individual among other individuals. In the language of St John's Gospel, he is born not of the will of man, nor of the will of the flesh, but of the will of God. He is a new creation, his humanity is part of the created world. He is new because though he has ancestry, his ancestry does not sum up the whole of his ascent towards existence. He possesses an ancestry which is given him. We see this in the genealogy of Christ, which moves step by step through the centuries of Hebrew history. But God is his Father. Christ has a dual ancestry that somehow sums up all of us. There is an openness into eternity, the absolute and the divine. He is unique because he is totally man, possessed of the human flesh he has received from the Virgin. But he is also the Son of God, as St Luke's gospel teaches us: 'The Holy Spirit shall overshadow thee, so that the Holy One who shall be born of thee shall be called and be - in reality - the Son of God.' It is in this context that we must think with deep reverence of the Mother of God and of her virginity, her ascent to holiness, and the Incarnation. In the Incarnation she became the unwedded bride, the bride who has known no man, the bride of the Most High, the bride of God. She represents in her own virginal person - which means she is totally open to God, totally surrendered and given - the whole of creation in its striving and longing and groaning for unity. That striving falls short of realisation for all of us, but is fulfilled in her. As the bride of the Lamb she is Creation; in that sense, she is wedded to the living God. There can be no thought of a human marriage, because it would be a mystical adultery. She is the wife, the bride of God and she can be the wife, the bride, of no man. Having become the dwelling place of the incarnate God, it is unthinkable that she should afterwards turn away into the ordinariness of life. It is even more unthinkable that Joseph, knowing of the Incarnation, should be able to treat her otherwise than as the sacred vessel of the Incarnation, an object of reverence and veneration. In the Incarnation and at the Nativity we can see that God, in Christ, delivers himself to mankind in the total defencelessness of a child. He gives himself. We can do with him whatever we choose. These words were used in the Gospel with reference to St John the Baptist, but they also apply here. We see what divine Love, and, ultimately, what perfect human love must be: a total gift of self, defenceless, totally vulnerable, and calling forth a response. This is essential, because we will be measured in our human dignity, in our human ability to understand God and commune with him by the way in which we can relate to a vulnerable and defenceless God. Christ says at the Last Supper: 'No one takes my life from me. I give it freely'. The Book of Revelation speaks of the Lamb of God slain before all ages. The sacrifice of the Son is intrinsic to the mystery of divine Love as addressed to the created world. The Son of God is the prototype of man. We are created in his image. Our ideal presence is already there in the Trinity. This image is projected into history and finds its place in history, when the time is ripe. The words of Christ at the Last Supper are important because they indicate that this is not a unilateral act by God, but the co-operation of God and man in the salvation of the world. There is a passage in the works of Charles Williams in which, speaking of the Incarnation, he says that it took place when a maiden of Israel proved capable of pronouncing the Holy Name with all her might, with all her heart, with all her will and all her flesh. Then the Word became flesh. This is co-operation between man and the created world on the one hand, and God on the other. In the child of Bethlehem, we see God delivering his Son into our hands. It is a moment when the Lamb of God is truly a defenceless and vulnerable lamb. It is a moment when we can see God sacrificing his Son for the salvation of the world. He sends him forth to death. We have an image of this in Abraham and Isaac. But in the case of Isaac, God provided a ram. In the case of his only-begotten Son, he did not provide a substitute. The Son had to die for the salvation of the world. There is a great deal one could say about the imagery of sacrifice and the innocent victim in the Old Testament. It is always the blameless, the most perfect victim which must be offered in sacrifice, - in order to prepare Israel for the ultimate sacrifice of the Son of God. But this should also make us understand that evil, hatred, all evil human passions, always result in the death and suffering of the innocent. One person drinks and drives, and another is killed on the road. There is also a corollary to this in the moment when Christ is brought to the temple by his Mother and Joseph. We must realise that this is the next step in the fulfillment of the Law. In Exodus, after the flight from Egypt, the Lord says to Moses that the people of Israel must bring forth the first-born male child of every marriage as an offering to Him. This implies a blood-offering in ransom for the first-born of Egypt who had to die that Israel might be freed. As in the story of Abraham and Isaac, however, the Lord allows a substitute. But when the Lord Jesus Christ is brought by his Mother to the temple, God takes possession of him, waits until the right time and accepts him as the blood-offering, as the ultimate sacrifice. This is what we must remember when we bring children for churching. This is what 'churching' signifies; every child is brought into the temple on the very same terms as Christ: to become God's own. By our will to be his, the child is surrendered unto life and unto death. Now I will turn to the significance, in this context, of the baptism of Christ. Earlier Bishop George spoke of the 'gradual perfecting' of the human nature of Christ. There is a certain ambiguity in this expression. What I believe he meant to say is not that there were originally stages of imperfection that were corrected afterwards, but that by the fact that Christ was born truly man, at every stage of his development in childhood and youth, he was adequate to that age and to that stage. And whenever a new faculty - whether of intelligence, of sensitivity, or of will - unfolded in him in the process of his maturing on the human level, this faculty was taken up by the Divinity and integrated into his total perfection, the divine-human harmony that is the incarnate Son of God. At every step he was perfect in the total and perfect union of his humanity and his Divinity. There was never a moment when he was less perfect, or imperfect, and then grew into perfection, though one can speak of a movement in which his humanity entered ever more fully the vocation which the God in him called him to fulfil. We find this in the Baptism of Christ. At that moment he comes to the Jordan, a man of thirty - and all the Fathers teach us that he had attained his full and perfect human maturity. At that moment, he, the man, Jesus Christ (cf. St Paul), with his free will, in the fullness of his humanity, chooses to fulfil his vocation. Here again there are the two wills, but at that moment the two wills are fulfilled in one harmony, which is the divine Will, to which the human will not only acquiesces, but with which the human will identifies gloriously, joyfully and sacrificially. At the moment when Christ came to the banks of Jordan, St John the Baptist did not know why he should baptise him. He saw in him the Lamb of God, the One who was pure, holy and without stain. What significance could baptism have? That every kind of sinner had come to the banks of Jordan, had immersed himself in its waters, had cleansed himself of evil and sin, and that these waters had become heavy with the sin of man, with the deadliness of sin, so that when the Lord Jesus Christ was plunged into them as wool is plunged into a dye, he came out with the sin of man imprinted on him. In the myth of Hercules and his combat with the centaur, the centaur is a being which is half-human and half-horse, that is, bestiality united to humanity. In a sense, this is our condition. We are all centaurs. We have all our glorious humanity in us, and yet we allow it to be defiled. In his combat with this monstrous being - and, in a sense, we are all monstrous, as contrasted with the surpassing beauty of Christ - Hercules wounds the centaur. In order to avenge himself, the centaur drenches his tunic in his own blood and sends it to Hercules, who puts it on. It clings to his flesh and burns him cruelly, yet he cannot take it off. Eventually he tears it away - with his flesh and with his life. This is an image which one could aptly use for what happens to Christ when he takes upon himself our humanity, our humanity which is like the centaur's tunic, drenched with murderous, lethal blood. Then he comes up out of Jordan, ready for the victory, and upon his humanity there comes the Holy Spirit of God in the form of a dove, the Spirit that fills him with power, not only in his divinity, for his humanity also is now fulfilled to total perfection. This will be revealed to us later, at the Transfiguration, when it is not the divinity of God that shines through in spite of the humanity. At that moment we see his humanity transfigured with Divinity and shining in all its glory. But this situation, this vision is incommunicable. The Apostles could see it, but they could not take part in it. It is only in the Resurrection, when all separatedness will be overcome, that the victory of Christ, his risen and transfigured humanity, will be capable of becoming ours . In the context of the humanity of Christ all the temptations offer a double challenge. The first challenge is this: 'You are filled with power. There is no limit to your power. The Spirit is not only upon .you, but within you. God is in you. Why can you not do anything you choose, if you are the Son of God?" In challenging Christ to prove that he is God the devil in effect says: 'You have created a world. Make it different for your own convenience. This world belongs to me, I will give you everything, provided you become one of my subjects. You are God. You are all powerful. You are filled with the Spirit. Show it. Throw yourself down from the pinnacle, that everyone may see and recognise you'. This is the temptation to power which would undo totally the kenosis , the emptying of self, the very act of the Incarnation. It would make the incarnate Son of God into a fallen god, and nothing else. Later Christ was tempted again. Satan reappeared while he was on the way to Caesaria Philippi, after he was recognised as the Son of God by Peter. Christ then began to tell his disciples about his Passion, but Peter turned to Him and said: 'Be merciful to yourself'. This was temptation to weakness. 'You cannot do it. Are you not flesh and blood? Have pity on yourself'. And he said the same words to Peter as he had said to Satan: 'Get thee behind me. Thou thinkest the things of the earth, and not the things of God'. So there are two temptations: power and weakness are equally tempting, and equally dangerous, for him and for us. We must strike the wonderful balance of faith that allows the power of God to be made manifest in weakness. As St Paul says: 'All things are possible for me in the sustaining power of Christ.' For me, 'and yet it is Christ's power, not mine'. At this point Christ becomes 'The Man of the Seventh Day'. At the end of Creation, the Lord rested on the Sabbath, the seventh day. What happened? It is a moment when, having fulfilled all his creative work, he handed it over to man to bring to perfection. St Maximus the Confessor tells us that man was created in such a way that he was at one not only with all the material and psychic world, but also with the spiritual world of the angels and of God himself. Being at the very centre, capable of communing with the one and the other, man could unite both, and so lead the whole of creation unto that perfection which is expressed by St Paul as 'God being all in all'. Man was put in charge of creation, but he betrayed it into the hands of Satan. So Christ becomes the New Adam, the One who takes upon himself to be the Leader, the head of the created world, to lead it to its vocation. This is why so many of the miracles of Christ are performed on the Sabbath. It is the Day of Man. It is the day when God rested from his works and said: 'Now it is for man to bring to perfection what had been made perfect, and to restore to wholeness what has been fragmented and broken and destroyed.' Christ did not perform miracles on the Sabbath in order to challenge the pharisees and the scribes. These miracles were acts by which he asserted himself as the New Adam who takes upon himself and fulfills the vocation of man. By accepting to be the New Adam he takes upon himself the complex destiny of being Perfect Man, and therefore has an absolute horror and revulsion against all sin, all evil, all impurity. And yet he accepts to be clothed in our fallen nature, with all its frailty, though without sin. He is crucified by the frailty of fallen man, because he is himself free. As St Maximus the Confessor says: 'In the Incarnation Christ becomes immortal, because it is impossible to conceive of humanity united inseparably to Divinity, and remaining mortal. Yet he takes upon himself everything, including mortality'. And he also takes upon himself the very condition of mortality - the loss of God - in order to be totally at one with us. So as God he is Love crucified. As man, he is the Perfect Man, crucified by the imperfection of the world which he has accepted to bear in the form of his flesh. Thus he finds himself in history with a dual solidarity. He is totally, unreservedly and ultimately at one with God. But at the same time he is as ultimately and as absolutely, by choice and by the desire of love, at one with the fallen world. The result is that, while he is of both, he is rejected by both. Because he is God's own, he is rejected by man; he must die 'outside the walls'. He cannot even be killed in Jerusalem. He cannot be killed, like the prophets, in the temple or within the precincts of the temple. He must be rejected from the very city of men. Because he has made himself one with man and has accepted the final predicament of man, the loss of God in Adam, he has to die alone, without God. That is what Archimandrite Sophrony once called 'a metaphysical swoon', a moment when, in his humanity, in his dying, he lost the sense of being at one with the Father. 'My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?' This is not the recitation of a prophetic psalm. One does not recite psalms when one is dying on the Cross. One cries out, 'Lord, have mercy'. One cries without words. But one does not recite a psalm for the edification of those standing around. The loss of God is a real event. Christ cannot die, otherwise than by losing God. This is the tragedy of the Cross. This is the inconceivable greatness of divine Love. He is not only vulnerable at that moment. He is undone. In his address Bishop George defined death as extinction. I do not believe this to be true. In the Old Testament, death is an atrocious, appalling moment when body and soul are severed from one another. The soul of each one of us who has lost God on earth, through the sin of our first parents and our own, descends into sheol; into the pit, the place where God is not. The body, which was the only way in which we could communicate with God - by our cry to him, by longing, by hope, by desire, is undone in corruption. It is the utter separatedness of the living human soul from God which is the tragedy of death and sheol in the Old Testament. This is what is signified by the icon of the Harrowing of Hell, or by the words 'he descended into hell' of the Apostles Creed. Soul and body are torn apart. But Divinity does not abandon either his body or his soul. The body of Christ lies incorruptible, because it is inseparably united with Divinity. The soul of Christ descends into hell, as the prayer says, in the splendour of his Godhead. And then the place where God was not, the place of his utter and radical absence, is filled with the divine Presence. This explains the words of the psalm: 'Where shall I flee from before thy face? In heaven is thy dwelling, in hell thou art also'. This, then, is the victory. This is what happens on Good Friday when, at the end of Matins, we already sing of the Resurrection. The Resurrection is not simply the resurrection of the body of Christ. It is victory over death, over sin, over Satan. Hell is emptied and laid waste. And Christ rests in the tomb, like God on the Seventh Day. The victory is won. Not only the victory of creation that opened the tragic history of mankind, but the ultimate victory. On Saturday we sing the Resurrection because body and soul are now united. Christ appears to us victorious. Separation is undone by the Cross and by the descent into hell. Separation can no longer hold Christ, either in the tomb or in hell. The Resurrection is the inevitable glorious result of this victory. Then comes the Ascension, when we see the Son of Man sitting at the right hand of Glory. We see where we ourselves belong; and we can say, with St Paul, that our life is 'hid with Christ in God'. 

Sourozh. 1983. N.14. P. 1-13

“Πρέπει να ασχολούμαστε μόνο με την ψυχή μας κι όχι με τους άλλους…”


Υπάρχει μια λανθασμένη αντίληψη σε μερικούς Χριστιανούς, που αποτελεί εμπόδιο της ιεραποστολικής εργασίας. Η αντίληψη ότι «πρέπει να ασχολούμαστε μόνο με την ψυχή μας και όχι με τους άλλους. Για τους άλλους θα φροντίσει ο Θεός. Εμείς πρέπει να βλέπουμε την αμαρτωλότητα και αναξιότητά μας. Να κοιτάξουμε πως θα διορθωθούμε εμείς οι ίδιοι. Να μελετούμε πνευματικά βιβλία, να προσευχόμαστε, να καταρτιζόμαστε. Όσο για τους άλλους… δε μας πέφτει λόγος».
Η αντίληψη αυτή στη βάση της είναι ορθή, αλλά μονομερής. Ναι, πρέπει να καλλιεργήσουμε πρώτα τον εαυτό μας. Και το είπαμε αυτό στο κεφάλαιο των προσόντων που πρέπει να έχει ο ιεραποστολικώς εργαζόμενος. (Σ.Σ.: Αυτό το κεφάλαιο θα το παρουσιάσουμε προσεχώς.)
Να προσέξουμε όμως μήπως πίσω από την άποψη αυτή κρύβεται κάποια δειλία και ατολμία ομολογίας ή η ραθυμία μας και η αμέλειά μας για τους άλλους. Ασφαλώς ωραίο πράγμα είναι να μένεις κλεισμένος στο σπίτι σου, να μελετάς, να προσεύχεσαι, να αισθάνεσαι κατάνυξη πνευματική. Αλλά δεν πρέπει να αρκείσαι σ’ αυτό μόνο. Είπαμε ότι η αγάπη προς τον πλησίον, που είναι μεγάλη και θεία εντολή, πρέπει να σε κινητοποιεί, για να μεταδώσεις αυτός που εσύ απόλαυσες κοντά στο Χριστό. Διαφορετικά αμαρτάνεις.
Εάν πάλι ισχυριστεί κανείς, ότι θέλει προηγουμένως να διορθωθεί ο ίδιος και έπειτα να εργαστεί για τους άλλους, θα του απαντήσουμε, ότι ο άνθρωπος που βρήκε μια πηγή δροσερού νερού και ξεδίψασε ο ίδιος, χωρίς χρονοτριβή καλεί σ’ αυτήν την πηγή και τους άλλους συνοδοιπόρους του, που υποφέρουν από δίψα. Τους δείχνει την πηγή αμέσως. Δεν τους αφήνει να ταλαιπωρούνται…
Όταν ο Φίλιππος γνώρισε το Χριστό, δεν κράτησε τη χαρά της γνωριμίας για το άτομο του. Αλλά έσπευσε αμέσως προς το φίλο του Ναθαναήλ και τον κάλεσε κι αυτόν. «Ευρήκαμεν τον Μεσσίαν… έρχου και ίδε» του είπε (Ιωαν. α΄ 46-47).
Αυτό πρέπει να κάνουμε κι εμείς μιμούμενοι το φλογερό ζήλο των πρώτων και αγνών εκείνων του Κυρίου μαθητών και να αφήσουμε κατά μέρος κάθε πρόφαση και δικαιολογία.
Εκείνοι που ισχυρίζονται ότι είναι ανάγκη να κοιτάξουν τον ατομικό τους καταρτισμό και γι’ αυτό δεν αισθάνονται ότι είναι ώριμοι να εργαστούν ιεραποστολικώς για τους άλλους ως δήθεν ανάξιοι, ας έχουν και το εξής υπόψη: Ο άγιος Ιωάννης της Κλίμακας, που ήταν μεγάλος δάσκαλος του μοναχισμού και της ορθόδοξης πνευματικότητας, γράφει τα εξής:
«Εκείνος που κρατεί τον ωφέλιμο και διδασκαλικό λόγο και δεν το μεταδίδει στους άλλους, … ούτε ποτίζει ώσπερ δροσοβόλος και ιαματική πηγή τας διψώσας ψυχάς, μέλλει να τιμωρηθή».
(Λόγος ΛΑ΄ § οστ΄)
Επίσης ο ίδιος τονίζει:
«Δεν είναι κανένα άλλο δώρο άξιο, που να το δέχεται παρ’ ημών ο Θεός με περισσότερη χαρά, όσο το να ελευθερώνουμε ψυχές εκ των δαιμόνων και να τις φέρνουμε σ’ Αυτόν (το Θεό) διορθωμένες με τη μετάνοια. Γιατί όλος ο κόσμος δεν είναι αντάξιος να αλλάξουμε μια ψυχή με αυτόν».
(Λόγος 31ος 90)
Και ο άγιος και Μέγας Αθανάσιος, απευθυνόμενος προς κάποιον όσιο άνδρα, το Δρακόντιο, που είχε εκλεγεί Επίσκοπος, αλλά από ταπεινοφροσύνη δεν ήθελε να δεχτεί την επισκοπή του, του έγραφε:
«Ω αγαπητέ Δρακόντιε… οι λαοί προσδοκούν να τους φέρεις τροφή, τη διδασκαλία των Αγίων Γραφών. Όταν λοιπόν οι προσδοκώντες λιμώττωσι (υποφέρουν από την πείνα), εσύ όμως τρέφεις μόνο τον εαυτό σου και έλθει ο Κύριος Ιησούς και θα παρουσιαστούμε ενώπιόν Του, ποια απολογία θα έχεις να του πεις;»
(Μ. Αθανασίου, Επιστολή 49η, προς Δρακόντιο § 2)

Από το βιβλίο “Εκστρατεία Ιεραποστολής” του Αρχιμανδρίτου Γρηγορίου Π. Χαραλαμπίδη, θεολόγου – ιεροκήρυκα, το οποίο κυκλοφορεί από τις εκδόσεις “ο Σωτήρ”.

Πηγή:diakonima
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...