Tuesday, 5 November 2013

The Monk's Mission by Elder Paisios the Athonite (+1994)

                    Elder Paisios The Athonite

Before I refer to my limited experience with beginner monks, it would be good to offer some counsel for their edification while they are, for one reason or the other, still found in the world. Perhaps this meagre assistance will strengthen them for their monastic journey.

It is most important for a beginner, while still in the world, to find a spiritual Father who will be a friend of Monasticism, because most of the spiritual Fathers in our times are monachomachoi ("monk-fighters"); and war against Monasticism in many different ways. In waging their war they even make use of Fathers of the Church who were involved in important social work, such as Saint Basil the Great and his Vasileiada. [6]

I don't wish to refer to the life of Saint Basil the Great before he began the Vasileiada, but simply express my thought: What would Saint Basil the Great do if he lived in our era? I am of the opinion that he would again retreat to a cave with his komboskini [7] watching the flame of love (of the social work of other holy fathers) being spread everywhere; not only to the faithful but even to the unfaithful, who all together constitute Social Providence, which also looks after members of the Spiritual Charity Associations (although only by granting a certificate of pauperism). In other words, social welfare is shouting every day: "Holy Fathers of our times, leave charity to us, the lay people, who are not in a position to do something else, and look to concern yourselves with something more spiritual".

Unfortunately, however, some clergymen not only do not follow this exhortation, since they do not understand it, but they also prevent those who do understand it and want to dedicate themselves entirely to Christ, feeling intensely the inclination to depart from the world. That is to say, as if it weren't enough that a beginner monk has to hear this from laymen; he has to hear plenty from the clergymen as well, who even make the unreasonable demand that monks leave the desert and come to the world to take up the social work and philanthropy. It is good to also mention some of the crowns which they weave for monks: "slackers, self-seekers, cowards", etc., considering themselves heroes because they struggle in the sinful society and monks cowards because they depart to save only their own soul.

I wonder why they are unable to understand the great mission of the monk! The monk departs far from the world not because he hates it, but because he loves it. In this way he will, through his prayer, help the world more in those matters that are, being humanly impossible, only possible by God's intervention. This is how God saves the world. The monk never says: "I will save the world". Instead, he prays for the salvation of the whole world, along with his own. When the Good God hears his prayer and helps the world, he does not say: "I saved the world", but "God saved the world".

In a few words, monks are the "radio operators" of Mother Church, and therefore, if they depart far from the world, they do it out of love, departing from the distractions of this world in order to be in better contact with God and help people more effectively.

Of course, when their unit is in danger, some mindless soldiers also share the irrational demand of certain clergymen (i.e. that monks should return to the world). They say that the radio operator should leave the radio aside and grab his rifle, as if by adding one more gun to the two hundred others he will salvage the situation. While the radio operator clamours to make contact, yelling "calling headquarters, come in, come in" etc., the others think that he calls pointlessly into the wind. However, astute radio operators pay no attention, even if they are reviled. They struggle until they make contact and then ask for immediate help from Headquarters and the air forces arrive, as well as the armed forces, the navy etc. Thus, in this way, and not with their meagre rifles, the unit is saved. The same applies to monks who advance with divine power, with their prayer, and not with their negligible individual powers. It is especially the case in our age, when evil is so widespread, that we are in need of God's intervention.

It is another matter if a monk, on account of some need, is found in the world for a short or even long period of time; then he assists also with his personal spiritual strength, which God has granted him. This activity, however, he considers as a secondary work, prayer always being his main work. He does this, of course, when in his cell as well, where he employs his handiwork as a secondary task, and if he sees anyone suffering next to him, he helps with whatever he has. Furthermore, when a person with problems visits him, he lays everything aside and tries to assist him humanly as well, in whatever he can.

All of this is to say that, the aim of the monk is not to be engaged in much handiwork and collect money to help the poor, as this translates into spiritual decline. Rather, through his prayer the monk could help, not by pounds, but by tons the needs of others (when, for instance, there exists a drought, by his prayer he could replenish the world's storehouses). Therefore, God "raiseth up the poor out of the dust, and lifteth up the beggar from the dunghill" [8]. Let us not forget what the Prophet Elijah [9] did.

Monks, therefore, don't leave the desert in order 'to go to the world to help a poor person, nor to visit someone ill in the hospital to give him an orange or some consolation (that which is usually done by lay people, and is the sort of thing that God will ask from them). Monks pray for all the sick to receive a twofold health (physical and spiritual), and the Good God has mercy on His creatures and helps them recover, so that they, in their turn, working as good Christians, will also help others.

Furthermore, neither do monks visit those in prison, for they themselves are voluntarily imprisoned due to their great philotimo [10] towards Christ, their Benefactor and Saviour; Christ gives His love in abundance to His children who have philotimo, the monks. Thus, while they are within the castle (the monastery), the presence and love of Christ transforms it into Paradise. This heavenly joy that the monks feel, they pray and ask that Christ give it to all our incarcerated brothers in the world's prisons. In this way, the Good God is moved by the love of His good children and spreads consolation to the souls of prisoners, many times even setting them free.

Besides these prisoners, monks help other more serious cases of those who are not imprisoned for just ten or twenty years, but eternally, and are in need of much greater help. These are our brothers awaiting trial, who have fallen asleep, whom the monks visit in their own way, offering many spiritual refreshments. The Good God helps the reposed, and, at the same time, acquaints the monks, after their pained prayers for their departed brothers, with an inexpressible rejoicing, as if saying: "Don't worry, my children, I have helped the departed as well".

Someone might ask: "Should we beseech God for His help?". Certainly we should beseech Him. Particularly, God is greatly moved when we sympathize with our brother and ask Him to help, because then He intervenes without transgressing our free will. Here, one observes the great spiritual nobility of God in that He does not even give the devil the right to protest. That is why He wants us to beseech Him so He can intervene—and He wants to intervene immediately to help His creatures. Of course, if God wants to, even now He can wind the devil into a ball and throw him into hell. However, for our own good He does not do it, because the devil, by beating us with his ill will, removes the dust from our soul.

In all that I have said and will mention further down, I want to stress the great mission of the monk, which is of greater importance than human philanthropy. For, even before someone becomes a monk, he has done his charitable work by giving everything away, as well as his own self to Christ (his rich Father), as Christ said to the young man [11]. So now, being His child (as a poor monk), he has a share in God's fortune and asks anything he wants from his Merciful Father. Then, his Father gives His mercy in abundance when it does not spiritually injure His unfortunate children.

A beginner monk hears a great deal from certain clergymen, as well as from many laymen, in their effort to dissuade him from the grandeur of Monasticism. Apart from that which is shameful to say (things, of course, that are not said by serious people), they also say that the monk is a dead entity, who doesn't have children, etc.

I don't want to examine those who say these things and ask them if they themselves have children, for this is the purpose of marriage and, thus, their life has meaning. The monk's aim, however, is different: virginity, "another life" [12]. But I would also like to ask those who have children: "Have they helped their children to secure Paradise, or do they only assist them materially?". Monks, who are concerned with the salvation of men's souls, become more affectionate fathers than fathers according to the flesh, have more children than that of the largest family, considering as their own children and brethren all of God's creatures, and with pain they pray that we might all reach our destination, close to God.

Since it is not easy for certain people to understand the spiritual regeneration that monks bring about in the people, I will mention how they also contribute to physical childbearing. Remaining chaste themselves and pure even from thoughts, they undo the sterility of many mothers on account of their boldness before God, both while still found in this life and also after they have fallen asleep. Therefore, when they are saints, monks "give birth" even after they have fallen asleep. Naturally, monks do not help in the pulpit with the preaching of the Gospel in order to enlighten the young and old, for their life is the Gospel. Thus, the Gospel is preached by example, which is the most positive way, something today's world especially thirsts after. As everyone is, more or less, educated in our day, they can speak of great truths about which they have read, which, however, have no relation whatsoever with the lives of most preachers. Hence, these preachers are constantly carrying about on their back the "woe" [13] Christ directed toward the Pharisees.

In short, monks are not merely lanterns that illumine city streets that people not stumble, but they are remote lighthouses on the rocks directing the ships of this world with their flashes, and upon the open seas the ships are orientated in order to reach their destination.

For this reason, not even parents should prevent their children from becoming monks (the radio operators of the Church), when, according to their inclination, God calls them. This mission is very significant and superior to what they themselves offer to God through their own mission. Lay people go regularly to church and make a promise to light a small or large candle. A monk, however, keeps vigil in church every day and has dedicated his entire self to Christ and, burning out of love for Him, he praises Him and thanks Him for himself and for the whole world.

Yet, I cannot understand why some clergymen and lay people fight Monasticism. Just as the army considers the signal corps an artery of the whole army, so too does our Church regard Monasticism. I would like to know: these blessed people who fight Monasticism, to which Church do they belong?

Endnotes

6. Vasileiada was the name given by Saint Basil (Vasileios) the Great's successors to his social and philanthropic work.

7. Komboskini (pl. komboskinia): The black woollen rope with 33, 50, 100 or 300 knots used by the Orthodox to count the number of times the Jesus Prayer is repeated.

8. 1 Sam. 2:8.

9. Cf. 1 Kg. 18:41-46.

10. Philotimo, according to Elder Paisios, is the reverent distillation of goodness, the love shown by humble people, from which every trace of self has been filtered out. Their hearts are full of gratitude towards God and to their fellow men, and out of spiritual sensitivity, they try to repay the slightest good which others do them.

11. Cf. Mt. 19:21,Mk. lO:21,Lk. 18:22.

12. From the Paschal Canon.

13. Cf. Mt. 23:13, Lk. 11:42-44.

From Epistles, by Elder Paisios of Mount Athos (Souroti, Thessaloniki, Greece: Holy Monastery "Evangelist John the Theologian", 2002), pp. 31-38.

Το θαύμα της συγχωρητικής αγάπης


Κάποτε ήταν ένα μικρό παιδάκι που τον έλεγαν Ανδρέα. Ο Ανδρέας ήταν ένα πολύ χαρούμενο παιδί, και οι γονείς του τον αγαπούσαν ολόψυχα.
Ο Ανδρέας μπορούσε να παίζει ελεύθερα, να τρέχει, να πηδάει, και να παίζει παντού, σε όλους τους χώρους του σπιτιού….. εκτός από ένα χώρο : το καθιστικό.
Ένας μόνο κανόνας υπήρχε στο σπίτι του Ανδρέα : «Ού παίξεις μέσα στο καθιστικό»
Ο Ανδρέας ήταν κατά βάση ένα ευχαριστημένο παιδί, όμως, περισσότερο από κάθε τι στον κόσμο, είχε μέσα του την επιθυμία να παίξει μέσα στο καθιστικό.
Κάθε φορά που περνούσε από κοντά, η επιθυμία του να παίξει εκεί μέσα μεγάλωνε.Όλο και περισσότερο, μεγάλωνε η εμμονή του να παίξει μέσα στον απαγορευμένο χώρο…
Μια μέρα, όταν απουσίαζαν οι γονείς του σε γειτονικό σπίτι, ο Ανδρέας άρπαξε την ευκαιρία!
Μπήκε μέσα στο απαγορευμένο δωμάτιο. Έτρεξε γύρω-γύρω. Πηδούσε εδώ και εκεί. Πεταγόταν από πολυθρόνα σε καναπέ και πίσω πάλι. Πόσο πολύ διασκέδαζε! Δεν μπορούσε να καταλάβει γιατί του απαγορευόταν τόσο απόλυτα να παίζει εκεί μέσα. Μα, αυτό ήταν το πιό διασκεδαστικό δωμάτιο του σπιτιού τους!
Και σε μια στιγμή, συνέβη.
ΚΡΑΑΑΑΤΣ !!!
Το πανάκριβο, αγαπημένο βάζο…. σπασμένο…. θρύψαλα…. σκορπισμένα τα κομμάτια του στο πάτωμα….
Ο Ανδρέας σταμάτησε το παιχνίδι. Μη ξέροντας τι να κάνει, έσπρωξε γρήγορα-γρήγορα τα θραύσματα του βάζου κάτω από τα καλύμματα της μεγάλης πολυθρόνας.
Μετά από λίγη ώρα, επέστρεψαν οι γονείς του. Διαισθάνθηκαν πως κάτι δεν πήγαινε καλά με το παιδί τους, αλλά εκείνο τους είπε πως όλα είναι εντάξει.
Δεν πέρασε πολύς καιρός, και ο Ανρέας σταμάτησε εντελώς το παιχνίδι.
Σταμάτησε να παίζει στο χωλ, στον κήπο, ακόμα και στο δωμάτιο παιχνιδιού. Ελάττωσε και τα υπαίθρια παιχνίδια με τους φίλους του.
Σταμάτησε τελείως και το τρέξιμο, και έπεσε σε μελαγχολία. Οι ώμοι του άρχισαν να γέρνουν. Δεν χαμογελούσε πιά. Έπαψε να είναι εκείνο το χαρούμενο, ευχαριστημένο παιδί που ήταν κάποτε.
Όταν τον ρωτούσαν για την κακοκεφιά του, το μόνο που τους έλεγε ήταν: «Όλα είναι μιά χαρά».
Τα μάτια του δεν κυττούσαν πλέον προς το καθιστικό με την ίδια φλέγουσα επιθυμία, αλλά με ένα θλιμμένο και έντρομο δέος. Εκεί, κάτω από την επίσημη πολυθρόνα του πατέρα του, ήξερε πως βρίσκονταν κρυμμένα τα θραύσματα ενός ακριβού βάζου….
Πέρασαν εβδομάδες. Μήνες. Η προσωπικότητα του Ανδρέα βυθιζόταν όλο και περισσότερο, κάτω από το βάρος της ενοχής….
Και τότε συνέβη.
Μια μέρα, καθώς έσερνε τα βήματά του στο χωλ του σπιτιού, είδε την μητέρα του να βγαίνει από το φρικτό εκείνο δωμάτιο.
Τα βλέμματά τους διασταυρώθηκαν.
Εκείνος κατάλαβε….. Εκείνη κατάλαβε……
Ωχχχχ. Πάγωσε από τον τρόμο.
Μέχρι που είδε την μητέρα του να χαμηλώνει προς το μέρος του, και να του ανοίγει ορθάνοιχτα την αγκαλιά της …
Και μετά συνέβη… Τα δάκρυα μετανοίας άρχισαν να κυλούν σαν ποτάμι στα μάγουλά του, και έτρεξε να χωθεί μέσα στην αγκαλιά της μητέρας του. 
«Γιατί;» του είπε με παράπονο. «Γιατί δεν μου το είπες;» 
Δεν χρειάστηκε να της πει περισσότερα. Η μητέρα του είχε ήδη δει τον φόβο και την θλίψη στα μάτια του. Και εκείνη την στιγμή, έμαθε και τον λόγο της μελαγχολίας του παιδιού της. Αλλά εκείνη την στιγμή, γνώρισε και ο Ανδρέας για πρώτη φορά το ”θαύμα της συγχωρητικής αγάπης”

 Πηγή:1myblog.pblogs.gr

Monday, 4 November 2013

Heresy as Intellectual Temptation


Heresy involves many temptations. But one that I wish to discuss is the temptation of intellectual simplicity! Simplicity is a double-edged sword. We need simplicity when referring to the Gospel and its theology but we need this simplicity to be orthodox. This is not “simple.” Really, the simplicity that we need is not so much simple as it is concise. There is a huge difference. When one is simple in theology one overlooks many suppositions in order to arrive at the simplistic plain. This is what heresy does! It paints a picture without prepping the canvas. The paint will not hold up under time or examination and thus peel right off. But being concise means prepping the canvas while painting the picture, a skill reserved for those with experience and calling in a particular spiritual field.
Heresy many times speaks to the undereducated and lower classes – or, simply put, people without proper resources (many times even the “educated” do not have proper resource). Heresy makes a theologian out of just about anyone, giving them quick access to ”theology” through a minimal amount of study. An exception to this rule would be heresies that demand extensive linguistic studies, which seem to be primarily designed to replace the Church itself.
Heresy usually involves denying much of the Church’s teachings throughout history in order to show how some type of modern – even in the medieval sense – prophet or teacher has suddenly found the truth. They tend to imply that the Church was hiding for the past thousand or so years and this person or group has suddenly found it in the form of new doctrine and practice.
Heresy spreads very fast due to the despondent crowd that is targeted by the master heretic. These hopeless and uninformed people will eat the heresy straight from the palm of their new master’s hand, desperately panting for intellectual status. When the desperate soul is found by the heretic and proselytized to, they usually feel very enlightened and enriched, at first, believing that they have finally discovered what God has intended for them. The propositions begin to hit them very fast and hard, leading them to feel overwhelmed yet also joyful, due to the nature of what is being pitched. It is overwhelming because of many reasons but it is joyful because it has just the right amount of historical revelation – usually in the form of Bible verses – sprinkled throughout the recipe. It’s laced with truth.
These sprinkles of truth that the heresy is laced with is usually very easy to understand and speaks to the flesh in many ways. Instant supposed sanctification through knowledge is many times the culprit. The ancient heresy of Gnosticism was like this. It appealed to people because it immediately stimulated their intellect. It appeased their need for knowledge.
The Gospel does not sanctify like Gnosticism or its contemporary counterparts. The Gospel works through humility, submission, pain, and even turmoil. One must become “childlike” to receive the Gospel. After one receives it one can or may begin to exhaustively study its implications, but for the most part Gospel sanctification involves just a lot of hard work and dying to one’s self! One submits to the Church and then bathes in grace.
God said in Matthew that nothing would EVER penetrate His Church. We all know by looking at history who the Church is, but some insist that there “is more” than what the Church can immediately offer them and thus begin to revert to some sort of reformed model where the Church is being reinvented every couple years – ultimately excommunicating itself – sometimes unknowingly – from the historical Church. The Church is the safe-house for God’s elect. It is the “pillar of truth,” as St. Paul says in 1 Timothy 3:15. The Church will indeed let you down at times but it will never kill your soul. Only your arrogant desire for “truth” will do that.

 Source-classicalchristianity.com

Ἅγ.Ἰουστῖνος Πόποβιτς-Τί πρέπει νὰ αἰτούμεθα τὸν Θεὸ καὶ τί ὄχι.

 Ἅγιος Ἰουστῖνος Πόποβιτς    
«Ἐὰν τὶς ἴδῃ τὸν ἀδελφὸν αὐτοῦ ἁμαρτάνοντα ἁμαρτίαν μὴ πρὸς θάνατον, αἰτήσει, καὶ δώσει αὐτῷ ζωήν, τοῖς ἁμαρτάνουσι μὴ πρὸς θάνατον. Ἔστιν ἁμαρτία πρὸς θάνατον· οὐ περὶ ἐκείνης λέγω ἵνα ἐρωτήσῃ» (Α” Ἰωάννου 5,16). Εὐαγγελικὸ εἶναι νὰ ἐπιθυμεῖς γιὰ τὸν καθένα τὴν σωτηρία του καὶ νὰ ἐργάζεσαι γι” αὐτήν. Αὐτὴ εἶναι ἡ ἐπιθυμία τοῦ Χριστοῦ γιὰ καθέναν, αὐτὸ πρέπει νὰ εἶναι καὶ δική μας ἐπιθυμία. Καὶ τοῦτο σημαίνει: νὰ μὴν ἐπιθυμοῦμε γιὰ κανέναν τὴν ἁμαρτία καὶ ἐκεῖνο ποὺ εἶναι ἁμαρτωλό, ἀλλὰ πάντα νὰ ἐπιθυμοῦμε τὸ ἀγαθὸ καὶ ἐκεῖνο ποὺ ὁδηγεῖ στὸν Πανάγαθο· νὰ μὴν ἐπιθυμοῦμε γιὰ κανέναν τὸ θάνατο καὶ ὅ,τι εἶναι θανατηφόρο, ἀλλὰ πάντα νὰ ἐπιθυμοῦμε τὴν ἀθανασία καὶ ὅ,τι ὁδηγεῖ στὴν ἀθανασία· νὰ μὴν ἐπιθυμοῦμε γιὰ κανέναν τὸν διάβολο καὶ ἐκεῖνο ποὺ εἶναι διαβολικό, ἀλλὰ γιὰ τὸν καθέναν νὰ ἐπιθυμοῦμε τὸν Χριστὸ καὶ ὅ,τι εἶναι τοῦ Χριστοῦ. Οἱ ἄνθρωποι ποὺ ἀγαποῦν τὴν ἁμαρτία, ἐπιθυμοῦν γιὰ τὸν ἑαυτὸ τοὺς τὸν θάνατο. Ἐὰν κάποιος εἶναι ἀνεπιστρεπτὶ ἐρωτευμένος μὲ τὶς ἁμαρτίες του, αὐτὸς ἤδη θανάτωσε τὸν ἐαυτό του. Ἐὰν ἐπιθυμεῖ κάποιος τὴν ἁμαρτία γι” ἄλλον, αὐτὸς ἐπιθυμεῖ τὸν θάνατό του. Ἐπειδὴ «ἡ ἁμαρτία ἀποτελεσθεῖσα ἀποκύει θάνατον» (Ἰακ. α’, 15). Ὑπάρχουν δύο εἴδη ἁμαρτίας: ἡ «ἁμαρτία μὴ πρὸς θάνατον» καὶ ἡ «ἁμαρτία πρὸς θάνατον». Ἡ «ἁμαρτία μὴ πρὸς θάνατον» εἶναι ἐκείνη ἡ ἁμαρτία γιὰ τὴν ὁποία ὁ ἄνθρωπος μετανοεῖ. Κάθε ἁμαρτία φέρνει στὴν ψυχὴ ἀπὸ ἕνα μικρὸ θάνατο· ἐνῶ μὲ τὴν μετάνοια ὁ ἄνθρωπος διώχνει τὴν ἁμαρτία ἀπὸ μέσα του, διώχνει τὸν θάνατο, ἀνασταίνει τὴν ψυχὴ του ἐκ νεκρῶν. Ἡ μετάνοια δὲν εἶναι μόνο δεύτερη βάπτιση, ἀλλὰ καὶ πρώτη ἀνάσταση. Ἀνάσταση τῆς ψυχῆς ἐκ νεκρῶν. Ἡ μετάνοια καταστρέφει τὸν τάφο τῆς ψυχῆς, ἐξαφανίζει τὸν πνευματικὸ θάνατο, εἰσάγοντας τὸν ἄνθρωπο στὴν αἰώνια ζωή. Ὁποιεσδήποτε ἁμαρτίες κι ἂν ἔχει ὁ ἄνθρωπος, ἐὰν μετανοήσει, «ἠγέρθη ἐκ νεκρῶν»: «νεκρὸς ἦν καὶ ἀνέζησε, καὶ ἀπολωλὼς ἢν καὶ εὑρέθη» (Λουκ. ιε’, 24.32). Ἔτσι, «ἁμαρτία μὴ πρὸς θάνατον» εἶναι κάθε μετανοημένη ἁμαρτία, ἀκόμα καὶ ἂν πραγματοποιήθηκε «ἑπτάκις τῆς ἡμέρας», ἐφόσον αὐτὸς ποὺ τὴν διέπραξε εἶπε «ἑπτάκις τῆς ἡμέρας» «μετανοῶ» (Λουκ. ιζ’, 3-4). Ἐνῶ «ἁμαρτία πρὸς θάνατον» εἶναι κάθε ἀμετανόητη ἁμαρτία, δηλαδὴ κάθε ἁμαρτία κατὰ τὴν ὁποία καὶ στὴν ὁποία παραμένει ὁ ἄνθρωπος συνειδητά, ἑκούσια καὶ ἐπίμονα. Τέτοια ἁμαρτία προκαλεῖ τὸ θάνατο τῆς ψυχῆς. Καὶ ὁ θάνατος τῆς ψυχῆς δὲν εἶναι ἄλλο παρὰ ὁ χωρισμὸς τῆς ψυχῆς ἀπὸ τὸν Θεό, ἡ στέρηση τοῦ Θεοῦ καὶ τῶν χαρισματικῶν δωρεῶν καὶ δυνάμεών Του ἀπὸ τὴν ψυχή. Ὁ ἅγιος Θεολόγος εὐαγγελίζεται: «Ἐὰν τὶς ἴδῃ τὸν ἀδελφὸν αὐτοῦ ἁμαρτάνοντα ἁμαρτίαν μὴ πρὸς θάνατον, αἰτήσει καὶ δώσει αὐτῷ ζωήν, τοῖς ἁμαρτάνουσι μὴ πρὸς θάνατον. Ἔστιν ἁμαρτία πρὸς θάνατον· οὐ περὶ ἐκείνης λέγω ἵνα ἐρωτήςῃ». «Αἰτήσει, καὶ δώσει αὐτῷ ζωήν». Ἐπειδὴ ἔκανε ἁμαρτία πέθανε, νέκρωσε τὸν ἑαυτό του, σκότωσε τὸν ἑαυτό του· ἐὰν παρακαλέσει, θὰ τοῦ δοθεῖ μέσω τῆς μετανοίας ἀνάσταση ἐκ νεκρῶν, ζωή. Ἔτσι ἡ προσευχὴ καὶ ἡ μετάνοια εἶναι νικητὲς τοῦ θανάτου· ἀνασταίνουν νεκρούς. Γιὰ τὴν «ἁμαρτία πρὸς θάνατον» νὰ μὴν «ἐρωτήσῃ». Γιατί; Ἐπειδὴ ὁ ἄνθρωπος μ” ὅλο του τὸ εἶναι, μ” ὅλη τὴν ψυχή, μ” ὅλη τὴ συνείδηση, μ” ὅλη τὴ θέληση εἰσέρχεται στὴν ἁμαρτία καὶ παραμένει συνειδητὰ καὶ ἑκούσια σ” αὐτήν. Δὲν θέλει νὰ τὴν ἀπαρνηθεῖ, νὰ τὴν μισήσει. Αὐτὸς εἶναι ἐκεῖνος ὁ «δεύτερος θάνατος», ἀπὸ τὸν ὁποῖο δὲν ἀνασταίνεται. Σὲ τέτοιον ἄνθρωπο ὁ Θεὸς δὲν ἐπιθυμεῖ, οὔτε θέλει νὰ τοῦ ἐπιβάλλει μὲ βία τὴν μετάνοια. Οὔτε ἐπιθυμεῖ, οὔτε θέλει, οὔτε μπορεῖ, ἐπειδὴ ὁ Θεὸς εἶναι ἀγάπη, καὶ διὰ τῆς ἀγάπης «εἶναι» καὶ ζεῖ καὶ ὑπάρχει. Ὁ Θεὸς ἀπὸ ἀγάπη δημιούργησε τὸν ἄνθρωπο μὲ θεόμορφη ἐλευθερία. Ἐὰν ἐπέβαλλε μὲ τὴ βία στὸν ἄνθρωπο τὴ θέλησή Του, τὸ Εὐαγγέλιό Του, τὴ σωτηρία Του, τὴ Βασιλεία Του, τὸν Ἑαυτό Του, τότε θὰ κατέστρεφε τὴν ἐλεύθερη βούληση τοῦ ἀνθρώπου. Κι ὁ ἄνθρωπος θὰ σταματοῦσε νὰ εἶναι ἄνθρωπος καὶ θὰ γινόταν αὐτόματο, μηχανή, ρομπότ. Ἐνῶ ὁ Θεὸς ἐπειδὴ εἶναι ἀγάπη, δὲν θὰ μποροῦσε νὰ τὸ κάνει, ἐπειδὴ αὐτὸ δὲν εἶναι στὴν φύση τῆς ἀγάπης. Ἐὰν θὰ τὸ ἔκανε, θὰ σταματοῦσε νὰ εἶναι Ἀγάπη. Ἐὰν σταματοῦσε ὁ Θεὸς νὰ εἶναι ἀγάπη θὰ ἔπαυε νὰ εἶναι Θεός. Αὐτὸς εἶναι ὁ λόγος ποὺ ὁ ἅγιος Μύστης συμβουλεύει ὅτι δὲν πρέπει νὰ προσευχόμαστε γιὰ τὴν «ἁμαρτία πρὸς θάνατον». Καὶ μ” αὐτὸ τὸν τρόπο μᾶς ὑποδεικνύει τὰ τοῦ Θεοῦ καὶ ὡς πρὸς τί πρέπει νὰ αἰτούμεθα τὸν Θεὸ καὶ τί ὄχι.

Ἑρμηνεία τῶν ἐπιστολῶν τοῦ Ἁγ. Ἰωάννου τοῦ Θεολόγου ἐκδ. Ἐν πλῷ

agiazoni.gr

Sunday, 3 November 2013

St Theophylact of Ochrid-The Parable of the Rich Man and Lazarus

 Twenty-second Sunday after Pentecost
The Parable of the Rich Man and Lazarus

Luke 16:19-31

From The Explanation of the Gospel of St. Luke

by Blessed Theophylact, Archbishop of Ochrid and Bulgaria

19-22. And there was a certain rich man, who was clothed in purple and fine linen, and fared sumptuously every day. And there was a certain poor man named Lazarus, who was laid at his gate, full of sores, and desiring to be fed with the crumbs which fell from the rich man's table: moreover the dogs came and licked his sores. And it came to pass, that the poor man died, and was carried by the angels into Abraham's bosom: the rich man also died, and was buried. These words follow closely upon what was said before. Because the Lord first taught, above [Lk. 16:1-13], how we are to be good stewards of wealth, now He appropriately adds this parable which teaches the same thing through the example of the rich man. This is a parable and not, as some have foolishly imagined, something which actually occurred. For good things have not yet been allotted to the righteous, nor punishments to the sinners. The Lord, then, fashioned this story to teach those who show no mercy and give no alms what punishments await them, and to teach the suffering what good things they will enjoy on account of the sufferings they patiently endure in this life.
The Lord gave no name to the rich man in this parable, because such a man is not worthy to be remembered by God by name. As the Lord says, through the prophet, nor will I make remembrance of their names through My lips. [Ps. 15:3] But the Lord mentions the poor man by name, for the names of the righteous are inscribed in the Book of Life. There is a story, according to the tradition of the Hebrews, of a certain Lazarus who lived at that time in Jerusalem, whose lot was one of extreme poverty and sickness. Because he was so well known in the city, the Lord uses his name in the parable. The rich man was awash in wealth, so much so that he clothed himself in purple and costly linen. Not only this, but he also luxuriated in every other kind of luxury. For it says that he fared sumptuously, not now and then, but everyday, and not in moderation, but sumptuously, meaning, extravagantly and at great cost. But Lazarus was destitute and grievously diseased, for it says that he was full of sores. It is one thing to be ill; it is another thing to be covered with open sores. But the evil which he suffered goes even further: lying at the gate of the rich man, he had the added torment of seeing others feasting to excess while he himself starved. He desired to be fed, not with their costly foods, but with the crumbs of these foods, the same crumbs which the dogs ate. He was also destitute of any help, for the dogs licked his sores, and he had no one to drive them away. Lazarus suffered such terrible things. Did he then blaspheme? Did he revile the luxury of the rich man? Did he condemn his callousness? Did he accuse the Divine Providence? He did none of these things, even in thought; rather, he bravely and wisely endured all. How do we know this? From the fact that the angels took him when he died. If he had been a grumbler and blasphemer, he would not have been deemed worthy of such an honor—to be escorted by angels. The rich man also died, and was buried. In truth, while he still lived his soul had been buried alive, entombed within his flesh. Therefore, when he died, his soul was not led away by the angels but was instead borne downwards into hades. He who has never had a single lofty or heavenly thought deserves the lowest place. Thus by saying that he was buried, the Lord implies that the rich mans soul received its portion in the lowest and darkest place.
23-26. And in hades he lift up his eyes, being in torments, and seeth Abraham afar off, and Lazarus in his bosom. And he cried and said, Father Abraham, have mercy on me, and send Lazarus,that he may dip the tip of his finger in water, and cool my tongue; for I am tormented in this flame. But Abraham said, Son, remember that thou in thy lifetime receivedst thy good things, and likewise Lazarus evil things: but now he is comforted, and thou art tormented. And beside all this, between us and you there is a great gulf fixed: so that they which would pass from hence to you cannot; neither can they pass to us, that would come from thence. When the Lord cast Adam out of paradise He settled him in a place just opposite, so that the continuous sight of paradise before his eyes would keep fresh in his mind the calamity that had befallen him and would arouse in him a sharper sense of his fall from good things. In like manner the Lord condemned the rich man to a place just opposite Lazarus, so that the sight of him in such a blessed state might awaken in the rich man the realization of the good things he lost because of his cruelty. Why was it that he saw Lazarus in the bosom of Abraham, and not of any other of the righteous? Because Abraham showed hospitality to strangers. The rich man sees Lazarus with Abraham as a reproof of his own in hospitality. Abraham used to draw into his own house even those who were just passing by, while the rich man overlooked a man who was lying every day within his very courtyard. And why does the rich man address his words to Abraham, and not to Lazarus? Perhaps he was ashamed. It may be that he judged Lazarus to be no different than himself and therefore assumed that Lazarus would bear a grudge for past wrongs. "If I, while enjoying such great prosperity, overlooked him while he was suffering such great afflictions, and did not even give him the crumbs from my table, how much more will he who was thus despised now remember those past wrongs and refuse to grant me any favor?" This is why he addresses his words to Abraham, thinking that the patriarch would be unaware of what had happened. How then does Abraham respond? Does he say, "0 cruel and heartless man! Are you not ashamed? Only now do you remember compassion?" Not this, but rather, Son. Behold a compassionate and holy soul! A certain wise man has said, "Trouble not a soul that has been brought low." This is why Abraham says, Son. By this he also intimates that it is within his power only to speak to him gently, but more than this he is not permitted to do. "That which I have to give, I give you—a voice of compassion. But to go from here to there I cannot, for all things have been shut. And you have received your good things, and in like manner Lazarus evil things." Why does he use the [Greek] word apelabes, thou receivedst, and not the [simpler Greek] word elabes? We say [in Greek] that a recipient receives [apolambanei] those things which are his due. What then do we learn? That even if a man is utterly defiled and has reached the last degree of wickedness, perhaps he has done at least one or two good things. So that even such a man may have some good things, as when he obtains prosperity in this life as his reward, and thus it may be said that he has received these things as his due. Likewise Lazarus received evil things as his due. For perhaps he also did one or two evil things, and he received as his merited reward for these evil things the suffering which he endured in this life. Therefore now he is comforted, while you are in torment. The chasm indicates the separation and the difference that exists between the righteous and the sinners. Just as their choices were far different in this life, so too their dwelling places in the next life are separated by a great distance, each one receiving as his due the reward appropriate to his choices in this life.
Mark here a conclusion to be drawn against the Origenists who say that there will be a time when there is an end to hell, that the sinners will be united with the righteous and with God, and thus that God will become all in all. Let us hear what Abraham says, that they who would pass from hence to you, or from thence to us, cannot. Therefore it is impossible for anyone to go from the place apportioned to the righteous to the place of the sinners, and likewise, Abraham teaches us, it is impossible to go from the place of punishment to the place of the righteous. And Abraham, I presume, is more trustworthy than Origen. (1) What is hades? Some say that it is a place of darkness beneath the earth; others have said that hades is the departure of the soul from that which is seen to that which is unseen and invisible. While the soul is in the body, it is manifest through its own energies [which animate the body], but when the soul has departed from the body it becomes invisible. (2) This is hades, they say. The bosom of Abraham is the enclosure within which are stored up the good things that await the righteous, who after the storm have found the heavenly haven. We use the same word to name those bodies of water on the sea which are shaped like harbors and havens. (3) Mark this as well—on the day of judgment the man who did wrong will see the one he wronged in the glory that is his, and the man who was wronged will likewise see the one who wronged him in that condemnation which befalls him, just as here in this parable the rich man sees Lazarus, and Lazarus, the rich man.
27-31. Then he said, I pray thee therefore, father, that thou wouldest send him to my father's house: for I have five brethren; that he may testify unto them, lest they also come into this place of torment. Abraham saith unto him, They have Moses and the prophets; let them hear them. And he said, Nay, father Abraham: but if one went unto them from the dead, they will repent. And he said unto him, If they hear not Moses and the prophets, neither will they be persuaded, though one rose from the dead. The miserable rich man, having failed in his request for himself, now makes supplication on behalf of others. See how punishment has led him to awareness. He who before had overlooked Lazarus as he lay at his feet now thinks of others who are absent, and begs that Lazarus be sent from the dead to his fathers house. He asks that not just anyone of the dead, but Lazarus in particular, be sent, so that the rich mans brothers might see him crowned with health and glory. They who once saw him in sickness and in dishonor and were witnesses of his poverty, would be witnesses of his glory. From this it is clear that Lazarus would have appeared to them in glory, had it been necessary to send him as a believable messenger. How then does Abraham reply? They have Moses. "You do not take care of your brothers," he is saying, "as well as He Who created them, God Himself. For He has appointed ten thousand teachers for them." But the rich man answers, Nay, father. Since he himself had heard the Scriptures and did not believe, considering the readings to be myths, he suspected that it was the same for his brothers. Judging them by what he knew to be true of himself, he said that they gave no more heed to the Scriptures than he had, but that if one should rise from the dead, then they would believe. There are those even now who say the same: "Who knows what is in hades? Who has ever come from there to tell us?" But let them hear Abraham who says that if we do not give heed to the Scriptures, we will not believe even those who come from hades. The Jews showed this to be true. Because they gave no heed to the Scriptures, they did not believe when they saw the dead resurrected, but even attempted to slay that other Lazarus who was four days dead. Many of the dead arose at the Lord's Crucifixion, yet this only intensified the Jews murderous assault against the Apostles. If raising the dead would truly help us to believe, the Lord would do this often. But there is no help so great as the close study of the Scriptures. For the devil by trickery has appeared to raise the dead and by this means has deceived the foolish; and, concerning those in hades, he spreads doctrines worthy of his own wickedness. But no such trickery can prevail against those who make wise study of the Scriptures. For the Scriptures are a lamp and a light [see Prov. 6:23], and when light shines, the thief appears and is discovered. Therefore, let us believe the Scriptures and not seek out resurrections from the dead.
The parable may also be understood in a more figurative sense. The rich man represents the Hebrew people. Of old this people was rich in all knowledge and wisdom, and in the words of God which are more precious than gold and many costly stones. And this people was clothed in purple and fine linen, having both kingship and priesthood, being a royal priesthood to God [Ex. 19:6]. The purple signifies kingship and the fine linen priesthood, for the Levites used fine linen cloth for the priestly vestments. The Hebrews fared sumptuously everyday. Everyday, morning and evening, they offered sacrifice, which was called the constant offering [endelechismos, Ex. 29:38, 42]. Lazarus represents the people from among the Gentiles, destitute of divine grace and wisdom, lying before the gates. For the Gentiles were not permitted to enter the house of God; this was considered a defilement, as when, in the Book of Acts, an outcry was made against Paul for bringing Gentiles into the temple and defiling that holy place [Acts 21]. The Gentiles were covered with the sores of festering sin, on which impudent dogs, the demons, were feeding. For our sores are pleasure to the demons. And the Gentiles longed for the crumbs which fell from the table of the rich man. They had no share at all of that bread which strengtheneth man's heart [Ps. 103:17], and they were in need of those most subtle and refined particles of the rational food, like the Canaanite woman who desired to be fed from the crumbs, even though she was a Gentile [Mt. 15] What then? The Hebrew people died to God, and their bones, which made no movement towards the good, became stiff in death. But Lazarus, the Gentile people, died to sin, and the Jews, who died in their sins, burn with the flame of spite. They are envious, as the Apostle says, that the Gentiles have been accepted unto faith [see Rm. 11:11], and that the people of the nations, who before were destitute and dishonored, are now in the bosom of Abraham, the father of the nations, and rightly so. For Abraham, himself a Gentile, believed in God, and changed from idolatry to the knowledge of God. Therefore it is right that those who share in his change and in his faith should also find rest in his bosom, and inherit his same portion, dwelling place, and store of good things. The Jew desires just one drop of the old sprinklings and purifications of the law in order to cool his tongue, that he might have the boldness to say to us that the law is still in effect. But he does not obtain his desire. For the law was until John the Forerunner and from then sacrifice and offering hast Thou not desired, as the prophet foretold [Ps. 39:9] And Daniel foretold that the anointing [chrisma] shall be destroyed [Dan. 9:26], and prophecy shall be sealed [Dan. 12:4, 9], meaning, that prophecy shall cease and be closed.
But you, 0 reader, must also understand the moral meaning of this parable: do not be rich in wickedness and overlook your mind which is starved and cast down, although it was created to be borne aloft. Do not let it wander outside, nor let it lie idly on the ground, but lead it within and let it act. Then there will be in you the working of the mind and the spirit, and not merely the feasting of the flesh. Likewise, there are other elements of this parable which may easily be understood for your moral benefit.

1. Origen's teaching of apokatastasis, the ultimate restoation and reconciliation of everyone, even Satan, was condemned as heresy at the Fifth Ecumenical Council held in Constantinople in 553 A.D.
2. BI. Theophylact here provides the connection between the Greek word, ades, hades, and its etymological root, aeides, invisible.
3. The Greek word kolpos means both bosom and bay.

Το Δώρο !


Ένα αγόρι 16 χρονών ρωτάει τον πατέρα του : " Μπαμπά άμα γίνω 18 ετών τι δώρο θα μου κάνεις ; " 
Ο πατέρας απαντάει : " Γιέ μου είναι μεγάλη διαδρομή μέχρι τότε , κάνε υπομονή ... "
Πέρασε ένας χρόνος και το αγόρι έγινε 17 χρονών αλλά τα πράγματα δεν πήγαν και τόσο καλά. Μετά από φωτιά που πήραν στο σπίτι το παιδί έπεσε σε κώμα. Οι γιατροί είπαν στους γονείς του ότι η καρδιά του παιδιού είναι πολύ αδύνατη και είναι πολύ... δύσκολο να ζήσει. Ο πατέρας ξέσπασε σε λυγμούς .
Πέρασε ένας χρόνος και την ημέρα των γενεθλίων του , που έκλεινε τα δεκαοκτώ του χρόνια , το παιδί γίνεται καλά και του επιτρέπουν οι γιατροί και γυρνάει στο σπίτι του. 

Πάνω στο κρεβάτι του βρίσκει μια επιστολή :
"Γιέ μου, αν διαβάζεις σήμερα αυτό το γράμμα , σημαίνει ότι όλα έχουν πάει καλά. Θυμήθηκα την μέρα που με ρώτησες τι δώρο θα σου κάνω στα 18α γενέθλια σου αλλά δεν θυμάμαι τι ακριβώς ήθελες να σου αγοράσω , έτσι και εγώ σου έδωσα την καρδιά μου για να μπορέσεις να ζήσεις ... Τώρα που έγινε με επιτυχία η μεταμόσχευση να ξέρεις ότι δεν θα πάψω ποτέ να σ΄ αγαπώ ... ασχέτως κι΄ αν δεν είμαι εκεί δίπλα σου .
Χρόνια πολλά παιδί μου !!!

Saturday, 2 November 2013

St. Justin Popovich-On Holy Relics

 

The Place of Holy Relics in the Orthodox Church


Without doubt, matter is represented in the human body in a manner which is most puzzling, most mysterious, and most complex. The brain: What wondrous mysteries pass between its physical and spiritual parts! How vast is the experience of the human race. In no manner can one ever fully comprehend or grasp these mysteries. Indeed, little of this is accessible to the human senses or intellectual investigation. So it is also with the heart of man, formed as it is entirely and solely from cosmic mysteries. So formed, too, are every cell, every molecule, every atom. Everyone and all are set on their mystical path toward God, toward the God-Man. Inasmuch as it was created by God, the Logos, matter possesses this same theocentricity. Moreover, by His advent into our earthly world, by His all-embracing condescension as God and Man for the redemption of the world, the Lord Christ clearly demonstrated that not only the soul, but matter also was created by God and for God, and that He is God and Man; and for it, matter, He is all and everything in the same manner as for the soul. Being created by God, the Logos, matter is, in its innermost core, God-longing and Christ-longing.


The most obvious proof of this is the fact that God the Word has become Incarnate, has become man (St. John 1:14). By His Incarnation, matter has been magnified with Divine glory and has entered into the grace- and virtue-bestowing, ascetic aim of deification, or union with Christ. God has become flesh, has become human, so that the entire man, the entire body, might be filled with God and with His miracle-working forces and powers. In the God-Man, the Lord Christ, and His Body, all matter has been set on a path toward Christ —the path of deification, transfiguration, sanctification, resurrection, and ascent to an eternal glory surpassing that of the Cherubim. And all of this takes place and will continue to take place through the Divine and human Body of the Church, which is truly the God-Man Christ in the total fullness of His Divine and Human Person, the fullness "that fills all in all" (Ephesians 1:23). Through its Divine and human existence in the Church, the human body, as matter, as substance, is sanctified by the Holy Spirit and in this way participates in the life of the Trinity. Matter thus attains its transcendent, divine meaning and goal, its eternal blessedness and its immortal joy in the God-Man.


The holiness of the Saints—both the holiness of their souls and of their bodies—derives from their zealous grace- and virtue-bestowing lives in the Body of the Church of Christ, of the God-Man. In this sense, holiness completely envelopes the human person—the entire soul and body and all that enters into the mystical composition of the human body. The holiness of the Saints does not hold forth only in their souls, but it necessarily extends to their bodies; so it is that both the body and the soul of a saint are sanctified. Thus we, in piously venerating the Saints, also venerate the entire person, in this manner not separating the holy soul from the holy body. Our pious veneration of the Saints' relics is a natural part of our pious respect for and prayerful entreaty to the Saints. All of this constitutes one indivisible ascetic act, just as the soul and body constitute the single, indivisible person of the Saint. Clearly, during his life on the earth, the Saint, by a continuous and singular grace- and virtue-bestowing synergy of soul and body, attains to the sanctification of his person, filling both the soul and body with the grace of the Holy Spirit and so transforming them into vessels of the holy mysteries and holy virtues. It is completely natural, again, to show pious reverence both to the former and to the latter, both to soul and body, both of them holy vessels of God's grace. When the charismatic power of Christ issues forth, it makes Grace-filled all the constituent parts of the human person and the person in his entirety. By unceasing enactment of the ascetic efforts set forth in the Gospels, Saints gradually fill themselves with the Holy Spirit, so that their sacred bodies, according to the word of the holy Apostle, become temples of the Holy Spirit (I Corinthians 6:19; 3:17), Christ dwelling by faith in their hearts (Ephesians 3:17) and by fruitful love also fulfilling the commandments of God the Father. Establishing themselves in the Holy Spirit through grace-bestowing ascetic labors, the Saints participate in the life of the Trinity, becoming sons of the Holy Trinity, temples of the Living God (II Corinthians 6:16); their whole lives thus flow from the Father, through the Son, in the Holy Spirit. By piously venerating the holy relics of the Saints, the Church reveres them as temples of the Holy Spirit, temples of the Living God, in which God dwells by Grace even after the earthly death of the Saints. And by His most wise and good Will, God creates miracles in and through these relics. Moreover, the miracles which derive from the holy relics witness also to the fact that their pious veneration by the people is pleasing to God.


The pious veneration of holy relics, based on their miraculous nature, originated from Divine Revelation. Even in the Old Testament God deigned to celebrate with miracles the holy relics of certain of those who were well-pleasing to Him. Thus, by the touch of the holy relics of the Prophet Elisea, a dead man was resurrected. The tomb and bones of this Prophet, who had prophesied to Jeroboam the destruction of idolatrous altars, were greatly revered in Judea. The Patriarch Joseph also left a testament to the sons of Israel to preserve his bones in Egypt and, during their exodus, to carry them to the promised land (Genesis 50:25).


The New Testament raised the human body to the sublime and divine heights, endowing it with a glory which the Cherubim and Seraphim do not possess. The Good News of the New Testament concerning the body—the significance and goal of the human body—is that, together with the soul, it achieves and inherits immortal life in Divine eternity. The Lord Christ has come to deify, to make Christ-like, the entire man, that is, the soul and body, and this by the resurrection, insuring thereby victory over death and eternal life. No one ever elevated the human body as did the Lord Christ by His bodily resurrection, the ascension of His body into heaven, and its eternal session at the right hand of God the Father. In this way, the Resurrected Christ extended the promise of resurrection to the nature of the human body—"having made for all flesh a path to eternal life." Thus man now knows that the body is created for eternity through union with the God-Man and that his divine work on earth is to struggle, with the soul, for eternal life; to struggle, with all those means that convey grace and virtue, to make himself grace-filled, fulfilled by Divine grace, and created anew as the temple of the Holy Spirit, the temple of the Living God.


Bearing in mind that this New Testamental notion of the human body has been achieved and realized in the persons of the Saints, Christians show a pious veneration for the bodies of the Saints, towards holy relics, the temples of the Holy Spirit, Who by God's grace abides within them. But Holy Revelation indicates that by God's immeasurable love for man, the Holy Spirit abides through His grace not only in the bodies of the Saints, but also in their clothing. So it is that the handkerchiefs of the holy apostle Paul healed the ill and expelled unclean spirits (Acts 19:12). With his mantle the Prophet Elias struck the water, separating the waters of the Jordan, and along the dry bed of the river crossed the Jordan with his disciple Elisea (IV Kings 2:8). The prophet Elisea did the very same thing, himself, with the same mantle, after the taking-up of Elias into heaven (IV Kings 2:14). All this has its verification and source in the Divine power that rested in the garments of the Savior, which encompassed His most pure and Divine body. Moreover, by His inexpressible love for man, the Divine Lord allows the servants of His Divinity to work miracles not only through their bodies and clothing, but even with the shadow of their bodies, which is evident in an occurrence with the holy apostle Peter: his shadow healed an ill man and expelled unclean spirits (Acts 5:15-16).


The eternal good news of Holy Revelation about sacred relics and their pious veneration is proved, and is continually being proved, by Holy Tradition from Apostolic times to the present day. Innumerable are the sacred relics of the holy Chosen Ones of God throughout the Orthodox world. Their miracles are innumerable. The pious veneration of these relics by Orthodox Christians is everywhere to be found. And without doubt this is because the holy relics, through their miracles, incite the Orthodox toward their pious veneration. From the very beginning, in Apostolic times, Christians piously preserved the honored relics of the Holy Forerunner and the holy Apostles, so that these could be preserved even for us. As well, during the times of persecution the sacred remains of the bodies of the holy Martyrs were taken away by Christians and hidden in their homes. From that time until now, the sacred relics of the holy Chosen Ones of God have, by their miracles, poured forth the immortal joy of our faith into the hearts of Orthodox Christians. The proofs concerning this are countless. We shall cite only several.


The way that the holy relics of the Saints were translated and greeted is in a touching manner described by St. Chrysostomos in a eulogy on St. Ignatios: "You, inhabitants of Antioch, have sent forth a bishop and received a martyr; you sent him forth with prayers, and received him back with crowns; and not only you, but all the cities which lay between. For how do you think that they behaved when they saw his remains being brought back? What pleasure was produced! How they rejoiced! With what laudations on all sides did they beset the crowned one! For as with a noble athlete, who has wrestled down all his antagonists, and who comes forth with radiant glory from the arena, the spectators receive him, and do not suffer him to tread the earth, bringing him home on their shoulders and according him countless praises. So also every city in turn received this Saint from Rome, and bearing him upon their shoulders as far as this city, escorted the crowned one with praises, hymning the champion.... At this time the holy Martyr bestows grace to the very same cities, establishing them in piety, and from that time to this day he enriches this city."


Speaking of the miraculous power of holy relics, Saint Ephraim the Syrian relates the following concerning the holy Martyrs: "Even after death they act as if alive, healing the sick, expelling demons, and by the power of the Lord rejecting every evil influence of the demons. This is because the miraculous grace of the Holy Spirit is always present in the holy relics."


During the finding of the relics of Saints Gervasius and Protasius, St. Ambrose, in speaking to his listeners, relates this with pious enthusiasm: "You know—indeed, you have yourselves seen—that many are cleansed from evil spirits, that very many also, having touched with their hands the robe of the Saints, are freed from those ailments which oppressed them. You see that the miracles of old times are renewed, when through the coming of the Lord Jesus grace was more abundantly shed forth upon the earth, and that many bodies are healed as it were by the shadow of the holy bodies. How many napkins are passed about! How many garments, laid upon the holy relics and endowed with the power of healing, are claimed! All are glad to touch even the outside thread, and whosoever touches it will be made whole."


Speaking of the miracles produced by holy relics, the blessed Augustine says: "To what do these miracles witness, but to this faith which preaches Christ risen in the flesh and ascended with the same flesh into heaven? For the martyrs themselves were martyrs, that is to say, were witnesses of this faith.... For this faith they gave their lives, and can now ask these benefits from the Lord in whose name they were slain. For this faith their extraordinary constancy was exercised, so that in these miracles great power was manifested as the result. For if the resurrection of the flesh to eternal life had not taken place in Christ, and were not to be accomplished in His people, as predicted by Christ..., why do the martyrs who were slain for this faith which proclaims the resurrection possess such power? ...These miracles attest this faith which preaches the resurrection of the flesh unto eternal life."


Saint Damascene, summarizing the life-giving teaching of Holy Scripture and Holy Tradition concerning the pious veneration of holy relics, preaches in a Cherubic manner from the altar of his God-bearing and Christ-like soul: "The Saints have become according to grace that which the Lord Christ is according to nature. That is, they have become gods according to grace: pure and living habitations of God. For God says: 'I will dwell in them, walk in them, and I will be their God' (II Corinthians 6:16; Leviticus 16:12). The Holy Scriptures likewise say: 'the souls of the righteous are in God's hand, and death cannot lay hold of them' (Wisdom of Solomon 3:1). For death is rather the sleep of Saints than their death. Further: 'Precious in the sight of the Lord is the death of His Saints' (Psalm 119:6). What, then, is more precious than to be in the hand of God? For God is life and light, and those who are in God's hand are in life and light. Further, that God dwells even in their bodies in a spiritual manner the all-divine Apostle attests: 'Know ye not that your bodies are the temples of the Holy Spirit dwelling in you?' (I Corinthians 3:16). And, 'the Lord is Spirit' (II Corinthians 3:17). Thus, the evangelical truth: 'If anyone destroy the temple of God, him will God destroy—for the temple of God is holy, and ye are that temple' (I Corinthians 3:17). Surely, then, we must ascribe honor to the living temples of God, the living dwelling-places of God. These, while they lived, stood with boldness before God. The Lord Christ granted us the relics of the Saints to be fountains of salvation unto us, pouring forth manifold blessings and abounding in sweetly fragrant oil. Let no one disbelieve this! For if water burst in the desert from the steep and solid rock according to God's will (Exodus 17:6), and from the jawbone of an ass to quench Samson's thirst (Judges 15:14-19), is it then unbelievable that fragrant oil should spring forth from relics of the holy Martyrs? By no means, at least to those who know the omnipotence of God and the honor which He accords to His Saints. According to the Old Testament law, everyone who touched a dead body was considered impure (Numbers 19:11). However, the Saints are not dead. For from the time when He Who is Himself Life and the Author of life was counted among the dead, we do not call those dead who have fallen asleep in the hope of the resurrection and with faith in Him. For how could a dead body work miracles? And how, through the holy relics, are demons driven off, diseases dispelled, the sick made well, the blind restored to sight, lepers cleansed, temptations and tribulations overcome; and how does every good gift come down from the Father of lights (St. James 1:17) to those who pray with sure faith?"


The universal faith of the Church concerning the pious veneration of holy relics was confirmed by the God-bearing Fathers of the Seventh Œcumenical Synod in its decrees: "Our Lord Jesus Christ granted to us the relics of Saints as a salvation-bearing source which pours forth varied benefits on the infirm. Consequently, those who presume to abandon the relics of the Martyrs: if they be hierarchs, let them be deposed; if however monastics or laymen, let them merely be excommunicated."


....That a pious veneration of the holy relics is a constituent part of the salvation rendered by the God-Man is also evidenced by the following facts: from the depths of sacred antiquity, churches were built on the graves and relics of Saints, and the holy Liturgy is performed only on antimensia, in which are placed parts of the holy relics. Moreover, the divine service books, especially the Menaion, are replete with prayers and hymns which refer to the pious veneration of holy relics....


All in all, the mystery of holy relics is at the heart of the universal mystery of the New Testament: the incarnation of God. The full mystery of the human body is explained by the incarnation, the embodiment of God in the God-Man, the Lord Jesus Christ. For this reason, then, the Gospel message concerning the body: "The body for the Lord, and the Lord for the body" (I Corinthians 6:13). And through a human body also the entire creation, all of matter, received its divine significance, the universal meaning of the God-Man. By man, who is sanctified in the Church by the holy mysteries and the holy virtues, the creation and even matter are sanctified, united to Christ. There accrues to this also a joy—the myrrh-streaming property of many relics. This wonder of myrrh has been given to the holy relics in order to indicate that Christians are truly "a sweet-savour of Christ unto God" (II Corinthians 2:15), sweet-smelling to God and to heaven. The truth of the Gospel is that the sin of man is a foul odor before God and every sin pleases the devil. Through the holy mysteries and holy virtues, Christians become "a sweet-savour of Christ unto God." For this reason, then, the holy relics of the Saints pour forth myrrh.

From Orthodox Tradition, Vol. VII, No. 1, p. 9. Translated from the Serbian by the Reverend Gregory Telepneff.

Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...