Tuesday, 27 August 2013

St.Theophan The Recluse-Why the Grace of God does not Abide all at Once Entirely with the Soul


One might ask: what is the reason that the grace of God does not abide all at once entirely, or likewise, it does not immediately reveal the triumph of complete communion of the soul with God? It is necessary to know this reason in order to work against it, and work successfully; for only by setting it aside can we attain the full in-dwelling of grace.

1. The Inner Make-Up of the Convert.

In order to understand why it does not happen this way, let us observe the inner make-up of the convert. Sin takes possession of a person and entices his attention, all his longing and all his strength. Acting under the influence of sin, the person permeates himself with it, and all parts of his existence, all his powers become accustomed to acting according to its suggestion. This alien activity that attaches itself to us, because of its extended stay, is so grafted onto us that it becomes as if in-born, taking on an appearance of something natural, and therefore unalterable and necessary. Thus become intertwined, for example, arrogance with the mind, greed with desires, lust with the heart, and with all our endeavors: selfishness and a certain dislike for others. In this manner, in the consciousness and will, in the powers of the soul — the mind, will and feelings, in all bodily functions, in all outward deeds, behavior, bearing, rules and customs — man becomes permeated with sin, that is, selfishness, passionateness, self-pleasing. St. Macarius expresses it thus: that sin, which entered into us at the Fall, possesses as if the entire image of man, which is why it is called the fleshly man, the emotional, the outer man, and why sin has robed with its own parts of our nature: mind with mind, will with will and so on. And, having overwhelmed the natural functioning of our own powers, it has counterfeited for them its own unnatural functioning, meanwhile fixing us in the belief that it is natural. In the midst of this obscurity, under the yoke of sin, everyone who is unconverted, unrepentant, and has not resolved to serve God in spirit and in truth abides in the satanic realm.
The grace of God that comes — at first through awakening, and then throughout the entire period of conversion — cuts off one man from the other, brings him to the awareness of this duality, to seeing the unnatural and what should be natural. It leads him to the resolve to shake off or cleanse away all the unnatural, so that the nature of God's image would appear in its full light. But it is obvious that such a resolve is only the beginning of the matter. Through it the person has only in consciousness and will left this realm of alien unnaturalness that functions in him; he has renounced it and applied himself to the awaited and desired naturalness. But in actual fact, in all his make-up he remains the same as he was — that is, permeated with sin, in soul and all his powers. Just as before, passionateness is present in all his bodily functions, the only difference being that before this was desired, chosen and acted by the person himself, but now it is undesired, is not delighted in, but is hated, parried, persecuted. The person has now come out of himself as if from a stinking corpse and sees what kind of passionate stench comes from which part of himself, and against his will sometimes senses to the point of mental disturbance the entire stench that he is emitting.

2. The Grace-filled Life Is at First Only a Seed.

So the true grace-filled life in a man is at first only a seed, a spark — but it is the seed sown among thorns, a spark covered from all sides with ash. It is still a weak candle burning in the thickest fog. With his consciousness and will the man has cleaved to God, and God has received him, united with him in this consciousness and will-power, or mind and spirit, as it is spoken of by Sts. Anthony and Macarius the Great. And the good, saved, God-pleasing parts of a man are there. All other parts are still held captive and do not yet want, are not yet able to submit to the requirements of the new life: the mind does not want to think in the new way, and thinks as it did before; the will is not able to want the new, it wants only the old; the heart does not know how to feel in the new way, only in the old.
It is the same for the body in all of its functions. Consequently, it is still impure, except for the one point which comprises the conscious and free power — the mind and spirit. God is most pure and unites with this one part, while all the other impure parts remain outside of Him, foreign to Him; although He is ready to fill the entire man, He cannot grant this because the man is impure. Then, as soon as the man becomes pure, God manifests the fullness of His indwelling. St. Gregory the Sinaite writes: "If our human nature is not kept pure or else restored to its original purity by the Holy Spirit, it cannot become one body and one spirit in Christ, either in this life or in the harmonious order of the life to come. For the all-embracing and unifying power of the Spirit does not complete the new garment of grace by sewing on to it a patch taken from the old garment of the passions." The Lord cannot abide there fully, for the dwelling is not yet prepared; it is impossible to pour the grace to the brim, for the vessel is still faulty. Doing that would mean squandering and killing this spiritual treasure in vain. For what communion hath light with darkness? And what concord hath Christ with Belial (II Cor. 6:14-15)? And the Lord, promising to come with the Father and create His habitation, places the irrevocable condition for this on the fulfillment of the commandment, all the commandments of course; or to put it another way, righteousness in all action, which is impossible without righteousness of the powers [mind, will, soul]; and righteousness of the powers is impossible without divorcement from the unrighteousness that had overtaken them, or without cleansing away sinfulness and passionateness.
The following passage could be applied here: If we say that we have fellowship with him, and walk in darkness, we lie, and do not the truth: But if we walk in the light, as he is in the light, we have fellowship one with another (I Jn. 1:6-7). This darkness is the darkness of passions, because later St. John uses in similar verses lack of love and the three-pronged lust (I Jn. 1:2, 10, 11, 15, 16). Light, to the contrary, is the light of virtue, again because later light is used interchangeably with virtues. From this it is seen that it is possible to truly stand in the perfection of communion with God only when the darkness of the passions has been dispersed and the light of the virtues has dawned; when the virtues have grown in us and become a part of our existence, vested us and penetrated our powers, expelling and pushing the passions out of them, so that no longer are we merely illuminated from without, but we ourselves are illuminating lights. Until this time communion with God is so hidden, so unknown, that it would seem that it was non-existent; and to some degree it should be considered unreliable, not decisive, incomplete, or not corresponding to ourselves.
Thus, we see that when the Lord has united Himself with a person's spirit and does not fill it all at once or come to dwell in it, this does not depend upon Him Who is ready to fill all things, but upon us, or rather our passions that are mingled with the powers of our nature, which has not yet divorced itself from them and exchanged them for virtues. St. Anthony the Great says, "It is our own sins that prevent God from shining within us."
If the main goal of the repentant sinner should be total, light-bearing and blessed communion with God, then the main hindrance to this is the existence of the passions still active and working in him — the virtues being as yet unsealed in him — and the unrighteousness of his powers. Therefore his main work upon conversion and repentance should be the uprooting of passions and sealing the virtues — in a word, correcting himself. He must remove all unrighteousness and receive or make room for righteousness; cast out sinful passions, habits, inadequacies — even those that are seemingly natural, as well as other unrighteousness that is seemingly excusable — and adopt virtues, good morals, rubrics and in general all facets of righteousness. However, he must not withdraw his attention from the final goal, but work with all eagerness against the passions, having the eyes of his mind fixed on God. In this consists the initial work which should be maintained throughout the building of a God-pleasing life, by which he must measure the straightness or crookedness of all rules he invents and of ascetic struggles he embarks upon. This must become a firm conviction, for all active delusions seem to spring from not knowing about this beginning. Without understanding the power of this, some stop with external practices alone, others stop with good works and expertise in these works without reaching any higher, while yet others proceed straight to contemplation. All of this is necessary, but everything should come in the proper order. At first all of this exists in seed form, then it develops, not exclusively, but the majority of the time in one part or another. Nevertheless, a gradual process is inescapable — the rising from external ascetic struggles to the internal, and only from one to the other, to contemplation — never the other way around.
Assured of this, we can now easily derive a guiding rule for a God-pleasing life, or for the spirit and character of ascetic struggles.

Taken From "The Path to Salvation"By St.Theophan The Recluse

Monday, 26 August 2013

ΚΑΤΑΚΡΙΣΗ ΚΑΙ ΙΕΡΟΚΑΤΗΓΟΡΙΑ: ΟΙ ΜΕΓΑΛΕΣ ΑΜΑΡΤΙΕΣ ΤΩΝ ΕΛΛΗΝΩΝ!


Μέσος έστηκεν Θεού και ανθρώπων ό ιερεύς, τας εκείθεν τιμάς κατάγων προς ημάς και τας παρ' ημών ικεσίας ανάγων εκεί.
Αλλά λέγεις: Δεν έχω, λοιπόν, εγώ το δικαίωμα να κρίνω τον ιερέα; Όχι, δεν δικαιούσαι. Εάν οι λαϊκοί είχον το δικαίωμα να ερευνούν τον βίον και την πολιτείαν των πνευματικών των ποιμένων, δια να αποφασίζουν αν πρέπη να πειθαρχούν εις αυτούς ή να ανταρτεύουν, τότε, οι αρχόμενοι θα έθεταν τον εαυτόν των επάνω από τους άρχοντας και το παν θα εγίνετο άνω κάτω, θα ήσαν άνω τα πόδια και κάτω η κεφαλή.

Ή δεν ακούεις τον Χριστόν, ο οποίος λέγει: μη κρίνετε, ίνα μη κριθήτε; (Ματθ. Ζ' 1), και τον Παύλον, ο οποίος μας φωνάζει Συ τι κρίνεις τον αδελφόν σου; (Ρωμ. ΙΔ' 10). Εάν τον αδελφόν σου έχεις καθήκον να μη κρίνης, πολύ περισσότερον οφείλης ν' απέχης από του να κρίνης τον ιερέα. Ο Θεός σου το απαγορεύει. Πως το τολμάς εσύ;
Άγιος Ιωάννης ο Χρυσόστομος

Η κατάκριση είναι ατόπημα μεγάλο. Ή Αγία Γραφή τονίζει: "Μη κρίνετε, ίνα μη κριθήτε" (Ματθ. 7,1) και "Συ τις ει ό κρίνων αλλότριον ικέτην;" (Ρωμ. 14,4)

Είναι αληθές πώς αυτός που κατακρίνει τον αδελφό του θα λογοδοτήσει στο Θεό. Ή πτώση του όμως είναι διπλή αν ό κατακρινόμενος δεν είναι ένας απλός άνθρωπος, αλλά λειτουργός του Υψίστου. Ό κατακρίνων κληρικόν "άνθρακας επισωρεύει εις την κεφαλήν του", βάζει δηλαδή αναμμένα κάρβουνα πάνω στο κεφάλι του. Ερευνώντας προσεκτικά τον εαυτό μας και αποκτώντας αυτογνωσία θα διαπιστώσουμε ότι κι εμείς κάποτε ανοίξαμε το στόμα μας και αναφερθήκαμε εναντίον κάποιου κληρικού μικρόσχημου ή μεγαλόσχημου. Αυτού του είδους ή κατάκριση ονομάζεται ιεροκατηγορία. Αυτή ή ιεροκατηγορία μάς καθιστά αναπολόγητους και μάς στερεί τη Βασιλεία του Θεού. Και το ερώτημα τίθεται ως εξής: "Γιατί ή ιεροκατηγορία είναι τόσο φοβερό αμάρτημα;"

Ιεροκατηγορώ σημαίνει κατηγορώ, κατακρίνω τον Ιερωμένο. Αν ή κατάκριση λαϊκού αδελφού συνιστά μέγα αμάρτημα, ή κατάκριση κληρικού συνιστά φοβερό ατόπημα, διότι ό κληρικός, ανεξάρτητα από την αμαρτωλότητα ή την αγιότητα του είναι Λειτουργός του Ύψιστου και έχει την ειδική Χάρη της Ιεροσύνης.

Και σε τί διαφέρει ό κληρικός από τούς λαϊκούς που απαρτίζουν τα μέλη του σώματος της Εκκλησίας; Ό Ιερέας είναι ό διάκονος του λαού του Θεού. Είναι ό «αρχηγός» της Ευχαριστιακής συνάξεως. Χωρίς τον ιερέα Ευχαριστιακή σύναξη (Θεία λειτουργία) δε γίνεται, έστω κι αν συγκεντρωθούν χίλιοι πρόεδροι Δημοκρατιών, χίλιοι Αυτοκράτορες. Και όχι μόνο αξιωματούχοι, όχι μόνο άνθρωποι, αλλά και όλα τα τάγματα των Αγγέλων να κατέβουν στη Γή δεν μπορούν να τελέσουν τη Θεία Ευχαριστία. Οι άγγελοι υπηρετούν, παρευρίσκονται, παρίστανται κύκλω του θυσιαστηρίου. Την εξουσία του "λειτουργείν", καθώς και του "δεσμείν τε και λύει αμαρτίας" την έδωσε ό Θεός στον Ιερέα, στον άνθρωπο με την ειδική χάρη της Ιεροσύνης, την οποία λαμβάνει δυνάμει του μυστηρίου της Ιεροσύνης. Τα αγιασμένα χέρια του ιερέως ψηλαφούν το Σώμα του Θεανθρώπου Λυτρωτού, του Κυρίου Ιησού Χριστού. Κρατώντας τα αγιασμένα αυτά χέρια τον Κύριον μετά το "πρόσχωμεν τα άγια τοις αγίοις" τα χείλη ψιθυρίζουν και λέγουν: "Μελίζεται και διαμελίζεται ό Αμνός του Θεού , ό μελιζόμενος και μη διαιρούμενος ό πάντοτε εσθιόμενος και μηδέποτε δαπανώμενος, αλλά τούς μετέχοντας αγιάζων". Τα αγιασμένα χέρια του ιερέως παραλαμβάνουν το νήπιο και το τοποθετούν στην κολυμβήθρα των υδάτων. Και το παιδί, μετά την τρίτη κατάδυση και ανάδυση, γίνεται παιδί του Θεού, πολιτογραφείται "εις τας δέλτους του Θεού", γίνεται το πριγκηπόπουλο του Ουρανού, ανώτερο απ όλα τα πριγκηπόπουλα και βασιλόπουλα της γης. Τα αγιασμένα χέρια του Ιερέως στεφανώνουν τούς μελλονύμφους και οι νεόνυμφοι πλέον από ξένοι ενώνονται "εις σάρκαν μίαν", γίνονται σύζυγοι και απαρτίζουν τη δική τους ευλογημένη οικογένεια. Τα αγιασμένα χέρια του Πνευματικού Ιερέως ακουμπούν την κεφαλή του μετανοιωμένου αμαρτωλού και ό άνθρωπος λαμβάνοντας τη συγχωρητική ευχή φεύγει από το ιερό εξομολογητήριο κεκαθαρμένος "μη έχων σπίλον ή ρυτίδα ή τι των τοιούτων", αλλά είναι τώρα άγιος και άμωμος. Τα αγιασμένα χέρια του 'Ιερέως λειτουργού κρατούν με ευλάβεια το Άγιον Ποτήριον και στην προσταγή του "Μετά φόβου Θεού πίστεως και αγάπης προσέλθετε", οι πιστοί πού συμμετέχουν ενεργά στην Ευχαριστιακή Σύναξη δέχονται το Σώμα και το Αίμα του Κυρίου και κοινωνούν "εις άφεσιν αμαρτιών και εις ζωήν αιώνιον", τρεφόμενοι έτσι με το ουράνιο Μάννα και ενισχυμένοι με το φάρμακο Αθανασίας πού χαρίζει ζωή. Ποιος άλλος έχει λάβει από το Θεό τέτοια εξουσία; Ουδείς. Μόνον ό ιερεύς δε βρίσκεται ούτε στη γη, ούτε στον ουρανό, αλλά μεταξύ ουρανού και γης. Αυτό λέγει ό Άγιος Χρυσορρήμων της 'Εκκλησίας: "μέσος έστηκεν Θεού και ανθρώπων ό ιερεύς, τας εκείθεν τιμάς κατάγων προς ημάς και τας παρ' ημών ικεσίας ανάγων εκεί". Αυτός είναι ό ιερέας.
Κι όμως. Ό ιερέας αυτός στα χρόνια της απιστίας και της διαφθοράς πού ζούμε, χλευάζεται. Πολλοί άνθρωποι στη θέα του Ιερέως χειρονομούν άπρεπα, γελούν, ειρωνεύονται, καγχάζουν.
Ό μακαριστός Αγιορείτης Γέροντας π. Γαβριήλ Διονυσιάτης σε ένα βιβλίο του αναφέρει τα εξής: Είναι βαρύ αμάρτημα ή ιεροκατηγορία και ό χλευασμός των λειτουργών της 'Εκκλησίας μας. Κατά την μακρά περίοδο (70 χρόνια), πού έζησα στον ευλογημένο αυτό τόπο, στο Άγιο Όρος, είδα πολλές τιμωρίες εξ αιτίας αυτής της αμαρτίας· είδα και σε ένα χειρόγραφο, στην βιβλιοθήκη της Μονής μας, την εξής διήγηση:
"Σ' ένα χωριό ένας γέροντας ιερέας, ενώ ήταν σ' όλα τα άλλα καλός και ιδιαίτερα επακόλουθος, υπέπιπτε στο πάθος της μέθης. Όταν έβγαινε από την 'Εκκλησία, παρασυρόταν από το πάθος του προς τα καφενεία. Εκεί, μετά από 23 ποτηράκια αλκοόλ, έχανε τον εαυτό του- ζαλιζόταν συναισθανόμενος όμως τη θέση του, σηκωνόταν και τρικλίζοντας έπαιρνε το δρόμο για το σπίτι του. Σ' αυτόν το δρόμο, όμως, είχε ό αδελφός του κατάστημα. Και όταν τον έβλεπε να περνάει σε τέτοια κατάσταση, έβγαινε στην πόρτα του μαγαζιού του και όχι από λύπη, αλλά μάλλον από ευθιξία, τον εφασκέλωνε από πίσω με το δεξί του χέρι (τον εμούτζωνε, όπως λέμε). Μετά από λίγο καιρό συνέπεσε να αποθάνει ό εύθικτος αυτός αδελφός του ιερέως. Όταν ύστερα από τρία χρόνια άνοιξαν τον τάφο του για την ανακομιδή βρήκαν το δεξί του χέρι άλιωτο. Τον ξανάθαψαν και μάλιστα σε άλλο σημείο. αλλά πάλι βρέθηκε το δεξί του χέρι ακέραιο. Τότε με συμβουλή του άλλου εφημέριου ιερέως, πήραν το αδιάλυτο χέρι και το εξέθεσαν στο νάρθηκα του ναού, για να τον συγχωρήσουνε οι συγχωριανοί του, για τυχόν λιποβαρή ζυγίσματα ή άλλες αδικίες, συνηθισμένες σ' όσους ασχολούνται με το εμπόριο. Αλλά και πάλι μετά από άλλο ένα έτος επανενταφιασμού βρέθηκε το χέρι αδιάλυτο. Τότε - κατά θεία νεύση ένας άλλος έμπορος πού είχε το κατάστημα του απέναντι, ανέφερε στον εφημέριο το γεγονός του καθημερινού φασκελώματος και του χλευασμού του γέροντα ιερέα από τον αδελφό του. Οπότε κατάλαβε ό καλός εκείνος ιερέας, ποια ήταν ή αιτία. Και αφού προσκάλεσε το γέροντα συλλειτουργό του τον παρότρυνε να κάνη τρισάγιο και να διαβάσει πάνω από το αδιάλυτο χέρι τη συγχωρητική ευχή. Πράγματι μόλις έγιναν αυτά, αμέσως τα σαρκώδη μέλη του άλιωτου χεριού διελύθησαν και έμειναν γυμνά τα οστά".
Με άλλα λόγια: η κατάκριση και τα σχόλια εις βάρος των ιερέων (που τα έχουμε πολλοί πολύ εύκολα) είναι πολλές φορές αμαρτία πιο βαριά από τα φασκελώματα και τιμωρούνται πιο αυστηρά.

Κατηγορούν δυστυχώς οι άνθρωποι τον ιερέα, όπου βρεθούν και κατασκευάζουν ανένδοτα με τη φαντασία τους προκειμένου να τον γελειοποιήσουν. Τα τελευταία χρόνια παρακολουθούμε ηθοποιούς να υποδύονται τον ιερέα και να προβαίνουν εις παντός είδους γελοιότητες και αισχρότητες. Παίρνουν αφορμές πολλές φορές από ορισμένες άστοχες ενέργειες απρόσεκτων κληρικών και βγάζουν συμπεράσματα άδικα για το πλήθος των αγωνιστών κληρικών. Γι' αυτούς όλοι οι κληρικοί, οι παπάδες, όπως αναφέρουν περιφρονητικά, είναι κακοί, φιλάργυροι, πλεονέκτες, διεφθαρμένοι, παλιάνθρωποι και μόνο ό φοβερός αυτός κατήγορος είναι άγιος και αξιοπρεπής. Πουθενά δεν υβρίζεται ό ιερέας τόσο, όσο στην πατρίδα μας.

Διηγούνται για κάποιον ιερέα τα εξής: "Όταν ήρθαμε εδώ, στο χωριό δεν είχαμε δικό μας ιερέα. Έτσι, μάς εξυπηρετούσε ό παπά - Γιάννης Βασιλειάδης, εφημέριος Αρχαγγέλου. Γύρω στο 1937 - 38, ήμουν νεαρός τότε 17 χρονών, λέει ή μάννα μου: - Πήγαινε παιδί μου να φέρεις τον παπά να κάνει αγιασμό στο περιβόλι μας και να διαβάσει ευχή, γιατί όπως βλέπω, ή κάμπια πού έπεσε στα λαχανικά, θα μάς τα αφανίσει όλα, θα πεινάσουμε. Επήγα λοιπόν στον Αρχάγγελο, μίλησα με τον παπά - Γιάννη και την άλλη ημέρα το πρωί τον έφερα στον κήπο. Έκανε τον αγιασμό, διάβασε τη σχετική ευχή και ράντισε τον κήπο μας. Ήταν ολοφάνερο ότι ό ιερέας προσευχόταν με όλη του την καρδιά. σε όλο το διάστημα, αλλά και μετά, έβλεπα τη μάννα μου ήσυχη και ήρεμη. Ήταν βέβαιη πώς θα γλυτώναμε τα λαχανικά μας. Εγώ, σαν άμυαλος νεαρός, έλεγα με κάποια αμφιβολία, μέσα μου: - Είναι δυνατόν να ψοφήσουν οι κάμπιες με το διάβασμα του παπά; Παρά ταύτα, δεν είπα τίποτε. Όταν τελείωσε ό ιερέας, έβγαλα χρήματα να τον πληρώσω. Είχαμε στο σπίτι ένα πενηντάρικο και ένα εκατοστάρικο. Του δίνω το πενηντάρικο. - Τι είναι αυτό; κάνει κάπως αγριεμένος ό παπά -Γιάννης. Νόμισα, πώς του φάνηκαν λίγα. Του δίνω, λοιπόν και το εκατοστάρικο. - Παιδί μου, λέει στεναχωρημένος, τι πράγματα είναι αυτά; εδώ ήρθα να διαβάσω τις κάμπιες, για να σταματήσουν να τρώνε το φαγητό σας και σεις, φτωχοί άνθρωποι, μού δίνετε χρήματα; Δε θέλω τίποτε! και δεν επήρε τίποτε απολύτως. Την άλλη μέρα, πρωί πρωί, έτρεξα στον κήπο. Οι κάμπιες είχαν εξαφανισθεί εντελώς όχι μόνο από το περιβόλι μας , αλλά και από όλα τα γύρω κτήματα, σε ικανή απόσταση. δεν είναι αυτό χειροπιαστό θαύμα; Μεγάλη ή πίστη μας στ ' αλήθεια!"
Μεταγενέστερες ειδήσεις μάς πληροφορούν, ότι ό πατήρ Ιωάννης υπήρξε πολύ ενάρετος κληρικός, ή δε ευχή του "τρυπούσε πέτρα!" για ανομβρία, αρρώστια, επιδημία και ό,τι άλλο κακό η δυσκολία, έτρεχαν στον πατέρα Ιωάννη για ευχή. Εκοιμήθη, μετά από ασθένεια, στην Αθήνα περί τα 1950. Πόσοι ανώνυμοι εκλεκτοί ιερείς του Θεού του Υψίστου έζησαν και ζουν ανάμεσα μας! Πόσο άδικο έχουν εκείνοι που κατακρίνουν ή καταδικάζουν ή, ακόμη χειρότερο, συκοφαντούν τους ιερείς της Εκκλησίας μας! Αλλά και πόσο κακό προξενούν στον εαυτό τους όλοι εκείνοι, πού ελαφρά τη καρδία, αποδέχονται τις κατηγορίες και τις συκοφαντίες! Ή ιεροσύνη είναι το μεγαλύτερο αγαθό που έδωσε ό Θεός στους ανθρώπους, γιατί χάρη στη δωρεά αυτή του Χρίστου μας πραγματοποιείται επί της γης το μυστήριο της σωτηρίας μας.
Ένας Επίσκοπος κάποτε, περιοδεύοντας τα χωριά της επαρχίας του, έφτασε σ' ένα πολύ μακρινό χωριουδάκι. Ζήτησε να ιδεί τον 'Ιερέα. Ύστερα από αρκετή ώρα παρουσιάστηκε μπροστά του ένας απλοϊκός χωρικός, που μόλις είχε γυρίσει από το χωράφι και φορούσε τα ρούχα της δουλειάς. Ήταν ό Ιερεύς του χωριού. Ό 'Επίσκοπος δεν έμεινε ικανοποιημένος. Ήθελε πιο ευπαρουσίαστο το Λειτουργό του Υψίστου. Ή άλλη μέρα ήταν Κυριακή. Ό Ιερεύς ετοιμάστηκε να λειτουργήσει κι ό 'Επίσκοπος δεν τον άφηνε από τα μάτια του. Ήθελε να τα παρακολουθήσει όλα. θα έβρισκε ίσως πολλά σφάλματα στον αγροίκο εκείνο χωρικό. Παράδοξο όμως! Από τη στιγμή, που άρχισε ή Θεία Λειτουργία, ό Ιερεύς κυκλώθηκε από ένα ουράνιο φως που τον θέρμαινε και τον λάμπρυνε χωρίς να τον καίει. Κι αυτό κράτησε ως το τέλος της Λειτουργίας. Αφού μοίρασε ό Ιερεύς το αντίδωρον στους χωρικούς, τον φώναξε στο Άγιο Βήμα ό 'Επίσκοπος και, πέφτοντας στα γόνατα, του ζήτησε να τον ευλογήσει. Ό απλοϊκός Ιερεύς σάστισε.
- Πώς είναι δυνατόν ό ανώτερος να ευλογηθεί από τον κατώτερο του; Εσύ ευλόγησέ με άγιε Δέσποτα.
- Αδύνατον να ευλογήσω εκείνον που στέκεται μέσα σε θεϊκή φλόγα και προσφέρει την αναίμακτη Θυσία. "Το έλαττον υπό του κρείττονος ευλογείται".
-Υπάρχει τάχα, άγιε Δέσποτα, 'Επίσκοπος ή Πρεσβύτερος και Διάκονος ακόμη, πού να πλησιάζει το άγιο Θυσιαστήριο και να μη περικυκλώνεται από ουράνιο φως; είπε με απορία ό απλοϊκός Ιερεύς. Τί να απαντήσει ό 'Επίσκοπος σ' εκείνον που έβλεπε το υπερφυσικό σαν το φυσικότερο πράγμα του κόσμου; Θαύμασε την καθαρότητα της καρδίας του κι έφυγε από το μικρό χωριό ωφελημένος.
Ό όσιος και θαυματουργός πατέρας μας Αναστάσιος ό Σιναΐτης μάς διηγήθηκε μία θαυμαστή και παράδοξη διήγηση λέγοντας τα εξής:
Κάποτε πού βρέθηκα στη Λαοδίκεια της Συρίας, κοντά στο όρος του Λιβάνου, απέναντι των Γαθισών, άκουσα από τούς εκεί γέροντες ένα αξιοθαύμαστο γεγονός. Υπήρχε, λέει, εκεί κάποιος πρεσβύτερος πού ζούσε μέχρι πριν δύο χρόνια. Μία νύχτα πήγε σ΄ αυτόν ένας άνθρωπος και του ζητούσε με πολλή βιασύνη να σηκωθεί να βαπτίσει το παιδί του, πού ήταν βρέφος και κινδύνευε από στιγμή σε στιγμή να πεθάνει. Σηκώθηκε λοιπόν από το κρεβάτι του ό Πρεσβύτερος και άρχισε αμέσως να λέει την ακολουθία του βαπτίσματος. Καθώς όμως ετοίμαζαν το νερό και το άγιο έλαιο και ενώ ό πρεσβύτερος συνέχιζε την ακολουθία, το παιδί πέθανε αβάπτιστο. Πήρε τότε ό πρεσβύτερος το παιδί, το έβαλε μπροστά στο βαπτιστήριο και είπε: "Σε σένα, το σύνοδο μου άγγελο λέω, μ' εκείνη την εξουσία πού έδωσε ό Χριστός σ' εμάς τούς ιερείς να δένουμε και να λύνουμε στον ουρανό και στη γη· δώσε την ψυχή αυτού του παιδιού πίσω στο σώμα του μέχρι να βαπτιστεί, διότι δε στάλθηκες για να το πάρεις αβάπτιστο. Διότι ξέρει ό Κύριος σου, πού είναι και δικός μου Κύριος, ότι δεν αμέλησα, αλλά μόλις ξύπνησα αμέσως άρχισα την ακολουθία του βαπτίσματος". Με τα λόγια αυτά του πρεσβύτερου προς τον άγγελο αναστήθηκε το παιδί, το βάπτισαν και αμέσως κοιμήθηκε πάλι έν Κυρίω. Όταν εγώ το άκουσα αυτό, θεώρησα δίκαιο να μην το αποσιωπήσω, αλλά να το γράψω για τη δόξα και την τιμή του μεγάλου Θεού και Σωτήρα μας Ιησού Χριστού και για την ωφέλεια των ακροατών. Κανείς λοιπόν να μην κρίνει ιερέα του Θεού, ακόμη και αν τον δει να πέφτει σε κάποιο σφάλμα. Διότι, αν ό λόγος και ό δεσμός του ιερέα ισχύει για τους αγγέλους, πόσο περισσότερο ισχύει για τους ανθρώπους; και αν ό ιερέας δε στέκεται στο ύψος του, τότε ό χριστιανός θα ανέχεται και θα αδιαφορεί; Όχι βέβαια. Αυτός που αγαπά τον ιερέα και που πονά την εκκλησία, πλησιάζει τον άτακτο κληρικό και του υποδεικνύει με σεβασμό τα λάθη του. Αν δε συμμορφωθεί τότε απευθύνεται στον Επίσκοπο και εκείνος έχει τον τρόπο να συμμορφώσει τον πταίσοντα. Κληρικό. Με την κατάκριση του κληρικού διαιωνίζουμε το κακό, σκανδαλίζουμε ανθρώπους που έχουν πίστη ασθενική και αγοράζουμε κόλαση.
Στη "Διακονία και Μαρτυρίαν", περιοδικό της Ιεράς Μητροπόλεως Καλαβρύτων και Αιγιαλείας, "ανεγράφη το εξής αξιόλογο:
Ό Μέγας Αλέξανδρος προχωρώντας νικηφόρα επί της Ασιατικής γης, έφθασε εις την πρωτεύουσαν της Φοινίκης Τύρον, ένα μεγάλο και πανίσχυρο κέντρο του έθνους των Φοινίκων. Μετά από πολιορκία επτά μηνών κυρίευσε την πρωτεύουσα αυτή και κατόπιν κατευθύνθηκε προς την ιερά Γή της 'Ιουδαίας το 332 π.Χ., με σκοπό να τιμωρήσει σκληρά τούς 'Ιουδαίους για την απιστία πού επέδειξαν στους αγώνες τους κατά των Φοινίκων. Τότε ό μέγας αρχιευρεύς των 'Ιουδαίων, Ιαδδουά, άρχισε να προσεύχεται για τη σωτηρία του λαού του και, εμπνεόμενος από θεία οπτασία, περιεβλήθη χρυσοκέντητη στολή μπλε, έβαλε στο κεφάλι του μίτρα με ολόχρυσο πέταλο στο μέτωπο και εκεί αποτύπωσε το όνομα του αληθινού Θεού, του αγνώστου στο Μέγα Αλέξανδρο και πήγε στο στρατόπεδο των Ελλήνων.
Τότε ό Μέγας Αλέξανδρος, ενώ μέχρι εκείνη τη στιγμή είχε άγριες διαθέσεις κατά των Ιουδαίων, μόλις αντίκρισε τον αρχιερέα και διάβασε το όνομα του αληθινού Θεού, ηλεκτρίσθηκε ολόκληρος, ή οργή του διαλύθηκε, ή αγέρωχος και αυταρχική ιδιοσυγκρασία του μεταβλήθηκε σε ταπεινή και συνεσταλμένη στοργή και ευσπλαχνία. Γεμάτος ταπεινοφροσύνη - ένας Μέγας Αλέξανδρος - κλίνει ευλαβικά το γόνατο του από σεβασμό και προσκυνά τον αρχιερέα των 'Ιουδαίων. Όλοι γύρω του έμειναν εμβρόντητοι μπροστά σ΄ αυτό το θέαμα- και παίρνοντας θάρρος τότε ό στρατηγός Παρμενίων έρωτά τον αρχηγό του Ελληνισμού, Μέγα Αλέξανδρο, πώς "ό υπό πάντων προσκυνούμενος Αλέξανδρος προσεκύνησε τον 'Ιουδαίων αρχιερέα;" Ό Μέγας Αλέξανδρος τού απάντησε: "Δεν προσκύνησα τον αρχιερέα, αλλά τον Θεόν, όστις εκείνον αρχιερέα κατέστησε".
Έτσι ακριβώς συμπεριφέρονται και οι σημερινοί ηγέτες μας, όταν αντικρίζουν τούς Ιεράρχες μας, τούς κληρικούς μας και πολύ περισσότερο τον Αρχιεπίσκοπο μας, ό όποιος συγκεντρώνει όλο το σεβασμό και την αγάπη των χριστιανών; Μήπως τούς λείπει ή πνευματική καλλιέργεια ή μήπως έχουν ελαττωμένη θεοσέβεια; Το ευγενές τέκνον της Μακεδονίας γίνεται δάσκαλος όλων εκείνων πού αμφισβητούν τούς κληρικούς και συζητούν συνεχώς σε βάρος τους.
Στις Πράξεις των Αποστόλων, στο πέμπτο δηλαδή βιβλίο της Καινής μας Διαθήκης, αναφέρεται ένα συγκλονιστικό γεγονός. Ό Απόστολος Παύλος, διηγείται ό συγγραφεύς των Πράξεων Ευαγγελιστής Λουκάς, οδηγείται στο συνέδριο των Ιουδαίων, για να δικασθεί. Αρχίζοντας την απολογία του λέγει "άνδρες αδελφοί, εγώ πάση συνειδήσει αγαθή πεπολίτευμαι τω Θεώ ταύτης της ημέρας"(Πραξ. Κ.Γ,Ι 1). Μόλις εξέφρασε αυτούς τούς λόγους ό επικεφαλής Αρχιερέας Ανανίας διέταζε τούς υπηρέτες του να τον ραπίσουν στο στόμα, προφανώς επειδή έλαβε το λόγο μόνος του. Τότε ό Παύλος του απάντησε: "τύπτειν σε μέλλει ό Θεός, τοίχε κεκονιαμένε", δηλαδή θα σε πατάξει ό Θεός ασβεστωμένε τοίχε. Οι παριστάμενοι ακούγοντας τα σκληρά αυτά λόγια του Αποστόλου, του λέγουν: - τον Αρχιερέα του Θεού υβρίζεις; και ό Παύλος που δεν γνώριζε ότι ήταν Αρχιερέας ζήτησε συγγνώμη: - δεν γνώριζα αδελφοί, λέγει, ότι ήταν Αρχιερέας, διότι ό λόγος του Θεού λέγει: "Άρχοντα του λαού σου ουκ ερείς κακώς". Δε νομίζουμε πώς ή συμπεριφορά του Παύλου προς τον Αρχιερέα Ανανία θέλει σχολιασμό. Το παράδειγμά του μάς διδάσκει, για να διδάσκουμε κι εμείς εκείνους που ζουν στην άγνοια και συμπεριφέρονται κακώς προς τούς κληρικούς.
Στους κληρικούς οφείλουμε σεβασμό και αγάπη. Στις προσευχές τους βασιζόμαστε. Κοντά τους θα τρέξουμε ζητώντας την ευχή τους. Από τη γέννησή μας μέχρι τα στερνά μας αυτούς αποζητούμε. Τούς χρειαζόμαστε. Αυτοί μάς συμφιλιώνουν με το Θεό, όταν παραστρατούμε. Αυτοί θα μάς οδηγήσουν στη Βασιλεία του Θεού.
Ό ιερός Χρυσόστομος προτρέπει τούς χριστιανούς που ιεροκατηγορούν να κλείσουν τα απαίδευτα στοματά τους και να μην κακολογούν τούς κληρικούς. Να τί λέγει σ' ένα του λόγο:
Κάνετε ό,τι περισσότερο μπορείτε, να έχετε το Άγιο Πνεύμα μέσα σας. Τιμάτε, όσο πιο πολύ μπορείτε, εκείνους στους οποίους ό Θεός έδωκε την Χάρη Του! μη το ξεχνάτε ποτέ. Είναι πολύ μεγάλο αξίωμα των ιερέων! Είπε ό Χριστός: "Αν τίνων αφήτε τας αμαρτίας αφίενται αυτοίς". Και γι' αυτό οφείλετε να υπακούετε στους πνευματικούς σας πατέρες· και να τους θεωρείτε άξιους της πύο μεγάλης τιμής. Συ κοιτάζεις την δουλειά Σου! και όταν το σπίτι σου πάει καλά, στα άλλα δεν δίνεις σημασία! Ό ιερέας όμως, αν τα καταφέρει καλά για τον εαυτό του και για το σπίτι του, αλλά δεν δείξει το ενδιαφέρον που πρέπει και για σένα, θα τον στείλει ό Χριστός στη Γιάννα, μαζί με τους αποστάτες! και ενώ από δική του πλευρά πήγαινε καλά, θα την πάθει από σας! Έχετέ το υπόψη σας λοιπόν! και δείχνετε στους ιερείς σας όλη την καλή σας διάθεση. Αυτοί αγρυπνούν για τις δικές σας ψυχές. θα δώσουν λόγο για σας. Να τους προσέχετε λοιπόν! Όσο πιο πολύ μπορείτε! Όταν όμως σεις με τη συμπεριφορά σας τους κάνετε και παρεκτρέπονται, φαντάζεσθε ότι θα σάς βγει σε καλό; Όσο ό οδηγός είναι ήρεμος και οι επιβάτες του οχήματος καλά πηγαίνουν. Μα αν αρχίσουν και τον βρίζουν και τον κάνουν να εξαγριώνεται και να μη μπορεί πια να κάνει σωστά την δουλειά του, είτε το θέλει είτε όχι, θα γίνουν πολλά κακά! και θα φταίνε εκείνοι! Έτσι και προκειμένου για τον ιερέα. Αν σεις τον προσέχετε, αν τον τιμάτε, θα τα καταφέρει όλα καλά. Μα αν τον κάνετε και χάνει κάθε όρεξη για το έργο του, αν τα χέρια του παραλύουν, δεν το καταλαβαίνετε, πώς ό,τι κακό συμβεί, θα ξεσπάσει σε βάρος σας; Δε βλέπετε, τί τιμή και σεβασμό δείχνουμε όλοι στους κοσμικούς άρχοντες; Ας προέρχεται ή εξουσία τους από το θέλημα ενός ανθρώπου, εκείνου πού τούς διόρισε! Ό,τι κι αν είναι, τούς τιμάτε! Σέβεστε την υπογραφή εκείνου πού τούς διόρισε. Πώς τολμάτε και καταφρονείτε και κακολογείτε και κυριολεκτικά "ξεπλένετε" με τα λόγια σας εκείνον πού χειροτόνησε ό ίδιος ό Θεός; δεν επιτρέπεται να κρίνωμε έναν απλό αδελφό μας χριστιανό. Πώς ακονίζουμε την γλώσσα μας εναντίον ιερέων; Τί απολογία θα δώσουμε; δεν το καταλαβαίνετε ότι έτσι κάνετε το δικαστήριο αδυσώπητο εις βάρος σας; Με αυτά πού λέγω, δεν λέω ότι καλά κάνουν οι παπάδες πού δεν κάνουν σωστά το καθήκον τους! Τούς λυπάμαι! Κλαίω γι' αυτούς! Γιατί, ξέρω, τί τούς περιμένει! Μα αυτό δεν σημαίνει, ότι μπορεί και να τούς κρίνει δ καθένας! Όσο κι αν δεν βαδίζουν οι ίδιοι καλά, συ ΔΕΝ θα ζημιωθείς, αν σταθείς απέναντι τους καλά, αν κάνεις αυτό πού πρέπει. Αυτά πού μάς δίνει ό ιερέας είναι κάτι πού μόνο ό Θεός μπορεί να το δίνει. Να το ξέρετε. Όσο ψηλά και αν φθάσετε σε αρετές, όλες μαζί δεν είναι τίποτε μπροστά στη Χάρη του Θεού πού παίρνετε από τα χέρια των ιερέων. Προσέχετε, μη φαντασθείτε, ότι τότε ΔΕΝ χρειάζεται να αγωνιζόμαστε! Γιατί αν το κάμομε, θα φορτώσουμε τον εαυτό μας ένα πλήθος αμαρτιών! Λοιπόν, τελικό συμπέρασμα: Έχουμε χρέος και το Θεό να φοβούμεθα και τους ιερείς Του να τιμάμε. Και τότε θα λάβουμε διπλό μισθό. Ένα, για τα καλά μας έργα και ένα για την αγάπη και για το σεβασμό, πού δείξαμε στους ιερείς, σαν υπηρέτες του Θεού μας.

Πρωτοπρ. Βασιλείου Κων. Ακριβόπουλου

Met.Anthony of Sourozh-ON THE PRAYER OF INTERCESSION


Prayer is an immense subject. It embraces and sustains the whole of Christian life. It is both the intimate relationship which each one of us has with our God and that which the Church has with him as the whole body of Christ. To deal with the subject as a whole seems to me impossible, and I should like just to say here something about the prayer of intercession. It is at the very heart of the Christian life. Christ is the supreme intercessor. And what is the Church, in each one of its members and in its totality but an extension in time and space, through the course of the ages and in a world which is gradually being won for him — an extension of the real presence of Christ, incarnate in those who are its members, and also, the presence of the Holy Spirit in those who, singly and together make up the temple of the Spirit?

God at the heart of the world's suffering

And yet the problem raised by the subject of intercession, as by so many kinds of prayer, is a serious problem for modern man: is it still possible for modern man to pray? Is the God to whom we turn in prayer a God who bears any sort of relation to the sufferings of the world? Is he simply a God who hears us, who sympathizes with us but who is still far away; or is he, rather, a God who is at the heart of things? May I remind you of a passage in the Book of Daniel, in the third chapter, which tells the story of the three young men whom King Nebuchudnezzar condemns to death by fire; bound hand and foot they are thrown into the furnace and the king comes to see their ordeal. And then he turns to his counselors and ministers and asks them with an amazement that is yet full of reverent awe: 'Were there not three men thrown in chains into the furnace? How is it then that I now see four men walking freely in the midst of the flames, and one of them looks like a son of the gods?'

...In the furnace... in the storm

This is the God to whom we can address our prayer of intercession, this God who voluntarily enters the fiery furnace, who sets free those who are there, who goes into the very depths of torment and lets himself be scorched by the flames, the God of whom we say in the Apostles' Creed that he descended into hell, who calls us too to descend right into the depths of the human hell, to the depths of suffering, of anguish, doubt, hatred to go down in the peace of Christ and to bring to that place where there is nothing but anguish and horror, the life-giving, transforming presence of the Living God.

We know the famous incident of the storm described in the Gospel according to St Mark, 4. 35-41. Elsewhere a passage well known to you (Matt. 14. 22-32) describes another storm in the course of which Peter, seeing Christ walking on the water amidst all the unleashed fury of the winds and waves, and desiring nothing but to be with his Lord and master, asks that he too may be enabled to walk over the water to join him. Both these storms give us a picture of the way in which so many men and women of our time see God's relation to the suffering and anguish of mankind, but they also reveal to us the truth of the matter. In the former passage, we see the apostles in the grip of the storm. Waves pour into their frail boat, death is waiting to devour them. They are fighting for their lives, and meanwhile their saviour – Christ – is calmly asleep with his head on a pillow! As they turn to him it is not to ask him piously for help — they show no sign of the faith they would confess if their heart were undivided, in the clear understanding of his divinity and his omnipotence — they are indignant: 'Are you going to let us die?' They might have added: 'If you can't do anything to help us at least be with us in our agony, at least die with us and share our horror in the face of death!' Is not this how millions of men and women see God in the situation? The world in its torment, its fear, its anguish, contending with death, sickness, hunger, despair — and a God who is asleep! — his head resting comfortably on a cushion while his creatures face their death agony? And the other account, the one that shows us St Peter walking on the water, is that not also a picture of the way in which modern man so often thinks of the place, the role, the activity of God? Caught again in a Squall the apostles are struggling for survival, the storm has overwhelmed them, reduced them to sheer terror and doubt, they are held in the clutch of fear; they know that death is just waiting to snatch them in an instant, that there is nothing between it and them but a few flimsy planks, and suddenly, walking on the water, amid this uproar of the elements, they see Christ. But they don't turn to him with their last cry, their last shred of hope, they think they are seeing a ghost: how could it be anything else? How could there be any place for Christ in this elemental chaos? Isn't he the key to all harmony, the centre around whom peace is restored, love reigns, harmony prevails? It cannot be he who is in the midst of the storm, it must be a monstrous apparition, a lie, a slander against God! And yet, it is he, it is he, at the heart of the storm. He is not at the lakeside calling his disciples to a safe harbour. He is at the heart of the chaos, because the Lord who is the Lord of peace, the Lord of life is also the Lord of death. All power is his, he is in command and he is king. No, it is not a ghost, it is Christ. And it is at the very heart of the storm that we find him, at that point where all forms of violence are in collision, where all the forces of death meet in a terrible equipoise that is able to crush everything beneath them: he is at the heart of death itself.

The man to whom Job calls

Having added these images to the one I referred to earlier in Daniel, I would like to add one more. Do you remember the Book of Job, the man upon whom every possible pain and calamity falls one after another, the man who is righteous and yet who is afflicted with all the punishments due to the sinner, to the man who has lost God, who no longer deserves to be called a man? At the end of the ninth chapter of his book we find a passage, which is striking for the sobriety of the anguish it reveals. Job, having come to the end of his strength cries out: 'Where is the man who will stand between me and my judge, who will put his hand on his shoulder and on mine? Where is there such a man?' In his prophetic vision, the vision of a man who can no longer be satisfied with an arbitrary conception of God, who is reaching out for a God of truth, a God of justice, a God of love, he is waiting for the man who will unite him with his judge. That gesture with which the expected man will put his hands on God's shoulder and on his shoulder is a gesture which unites. He is not waiting for someone to come and find a way to a compromise between himself and God, someone who will patch up a temporary peace, bring about an armistice, that is not what he is looking for, he could get all that by submitting like a slave. But Job's heart is that of a son, what he is waiting for is a reconciliation, a new situation which will create an utterly and completely new relationship between himself and God, in which there will be no place for arbitrary conceptions, and where truth will reign in the utmost fullness of its meaning. It was Christ for whom he was waiting! It was Christ who was to come and stand between God and man, who was to stretch out his hands on the Cross and join man and God together again in a bond of unity which will hold forever.

Intercession, the Act of Incarnate God

When we think of Intercession we so often think in mean and paltry terms. I don't want to speak flippantly, but when we pray for the needs of the world, don't we all too often have the air of reminding God of his sins of omission? Don't we seem to be saying to God: 'Lord, haven't you noticed that this person is in agony and someone else dying of hunger, that one land is being devastated by war and another groaning under a foreign yoke?' Don't we seem to be reminding God of what he ought to be doing if he would only follow our excellent advice. That is not intercession, nor is God's response simply a matter of obedience to the orders we give him in our prayer. We shall come back presently to God's response, but let us now ask ourselves what intercession is, if it is not this appeal to God to do what he ought to do and is not doing.

The term 'intercession' does not denote first and foremost a prayer; it denotes an action; to intercede is to take a step which brings us to the heart of a situation, which brings us to the point where all conflicts meet head-on, where the impact of this collision is at its most violent. Intercession begins with an involvement, an involvement that is definitive, permanent, complete, unlimited, unconditional. The interceding Christ is not the praying Christ, it is the Christ who is the Word of God made flesh, it is the Son of God who becomes the son of man; there is every evidence that he prays, but his act of intercession is first of all an act and not a word. The Son of God becomes the son of man, the Word is made flesh, there is a unique person in whom God and man meet, in whom the breach between God and man is healed, harmony is restored: man and God are united forever in the perfect obedience of the man Jesus Christ of which St Paul speaks, in the perfect, sacrificial self-giving of the Word made flesh. There is in him, as it were, a concentration of the whole conflict, of all that separates man and God, and in him, this conflict, this separation, is brought to an end.

But just how far does this solidarity between man and Christ, between Christ and God extend? What are its depth and its breadth? It is essential for us to understand this because we are called to be what Christ was, we are the body of Christ, broken for the sin of the world, we are the presence of Christ in a world which still needs salvation, which is still separated from God and divided in itself. I have used the word solidarity advisedly: it is a word of current usage, it denotes a relation with which we are quite familiar: the idea of solidarity with each other is easy for us to grasp clearly. Christ chose that two-fold solidarity which leads him to the Cross. He chose to be man in the truest and fullest sense of the word, to be a stranger to our humanity in nothing except his freedom from sin, but to belong to it utterly, because he takes upon himself the sins of the world.

Jesus at Jordan — Jesus in hell

One of the images which I find most striking, perhaps because of its inherent tragedy, is the baptism of Christ. Around St John are gathered all those who are defiled, mortally wounded by sin, they repent and ask for mercy, they want to be purified and cleansed and they plunge into the waters of Jordan and these waters wash away their sins: they come out again pure and clean, they can begin a new life. And Christ — the only one who is without sin — he too comes to be baptized. He too plunges into these waters, heavy and turbid with human mortality, human sin, human atheism, with all the evil on earth, he immerses himself in this element of death, and emerges again weighed down with the burden of this evil, this sin, this death. Baptism, which meant liberation for those who came in penitence to St John, means for him the beginning of his Passion. He is now laden with the death of others: by nature immortal, he will die a death like ours. When we think of what Christ has in common with us, we note in the Gospel certain characteristics which make him truly human: he is hungry, thirsty and tired; he has moments of depression; he weeps for Lazarus, he is angry with the merchants in the Temple, and many other things. It seems to us, finally, that he has this in common with us, that he dies as we do, and yet, it is perhaps here, in this death of his, that there is the most profound difference between him and us.

St Maximus the Confessor, in the sixth century, reflecting on the Incarnation, the passion and the death of Christ says: 'If it is true, as Scripture teaches, and as God proclaims through his prophets and apostles, that death is the fruit of sin, that man dies from the loss of God, that man dies from being no longer grafted on the source of life, then Christ, from the moment of his conception is alive and immortal. He cannot be at the same time the Living God and mortal man; even his humanity, penetrated with divinity, is beyond death, because it is united with God forever. How then does he come to die? By this act, willed and freely accepted, of solidarity with sinful man, he immerses himself in our death, he clothes himself with it, he is going to die of it. And to that end he shares all that belongs to our human destiny, not only hunger and thirst and weariness and anguish, but something more besides: have you ever given the attention of your whole heart, your whole power of feeling, to the cry which he utters from the height of the cross: 'My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?' If it is true that one dies from the absence of God, from the loss of God, then it is there that he accepts a solidarity — ultimate, agonising, appalling — with us: he undertakes to share with us the only tragedy that is final and ultimate, the loss of God which is our death. And in his death, he is torn apart. His soul, dazzling with the light of the divinity, and his body, united forever with his divinity, are separated, torn from each other; the body of Christ rests incorruptible in the tomb because it is penetrated by the presence of God, and the soul of Christ; like the soul of every man, descends into hell as we proclaim in the Apostles' Creed.

There is no longer any place where God is not

But what then is hell? Oh how different it is from the hell of Dante, from all those images that we find of the Christian hell, the place of torment! The hell of the Old Testament is something infinitely more terrible; the sheol of the Old Testament is the place of the radical absence of God, it is the place where God is not and never shall be, and it is to that place that every human soul descends, not only the souls of sinners but also those of the just, because before Christ there is no bridge between the eternity of God and the death of man. Christ, sharing our destiny, having lost God and being dead because of it, descends to the place where every human soul that has lost God descends, and there is set the very mystery of our redemption. He descends into this hell which awaits him, this hell which he has overcome on earth at every moment and which now awaits its victim, which now knows that it is going to possess him and overcome him for ever; and suddenly this hell finds itself full of the splendor of the divinity, of the eternal and uncreated light of the Living God. It is by his death that he has conquered hell and death: there is no longer a place where God is not and to which man will be banished. Now, for the Christian, to die is to fall asleep in the Lord. Death in its utmost atrocity, as irremediable separation from God, does not exist, and that is why we sing in the Orthodox Church and why we all believe, with the joy and exultation of faith, that the death of Christ has destroyed death; not this falling asleep in the Lord, but the definitive death of separation.

The act to which Christ calls us

That is the measure of the solidarity of Christ with men: his solidarity with God was total and it was on that account that the city of men rejected him. It is because of this, because he wished to be faithful to the end, to be one with God to the end, that the city of men could only do him to death outside the walls of Jerusalem. Rejected by men, abandoned by God, yet united in solidarity with both at the cost of his life — that is the solidarity of Christ and that is the solidarity to which he calls us. It is his incarnation, his absolute solidarity with God and with man, which is the act of intercession on which a prayer of intercession is grafted, a prayer which is true because it is under-girded by the act, a prayer which is true because it expresses an act accomplished, not simply an appeal to the generosity or mercy of God, but an appeal to God under-girded by an act which cannot be forgotten or rejected by the Father who so loved the world that he gave his only Son to die for its salvation.

We are called to be in the world what Christ was. Remember the words he spoke and the mission he gave to his disciples on the evening of his resurrection: 'As my Father has sent me so I send you'. And these words, which sometimes sound like a song of victory or a-trumpet blast to those of us who live in a strong world and who are apt to turn with rather ill-considered charity towards a world which is weaker, these words which send out missionaries supported by all the power of the country from which they come, these words sounded more like a knell when Christ uttered them. On Good Friday Christ was dead on the cross, on Sunday he says to them: 'I send you into the world as my Father has sent me'. The image is clear: as sheep into the midst of wolves — to give your life, to shed your blood, in order that others can believe in the love of God and be re-born in the hope of this love, and can be joined to this body of Christ which is destined, as long as the world lasts, as long as there is one sinner in the world, to crucifixion. Christ in the glory of his Father, seated at the right hand of the Father, bears in his hands and feet and side, the marks of the Passion.

When we think of those who are caught up and held in the Redemption of Christ, those who are incorporated in him, whose destiny he shared and still shares, we see that no one can be foreign or external to the mystery of Christ. He lived, a man of the Old Testament among men of the Old Testament, faithful to the law, faithful to sacrifice, faithful to all that was of divine ordinance in the house of Israel, but he has shared also, and in a way that none of us can measure, experience or know, the major tragedy of millions of men and women of our time: a loss of God so radical that one dies of it. There is no atheist in the world who has ever measured the depth of the absence of God as the Son of God made man measured it on the cross when he cried to his Father: 'My God, my God, why hast thou forsaken me?' The atheist does not know him, he rejects and denies him, and yet his experience as an atheist is a drop in the ocean of this loss of God which Christ knew.

Communion, commitment to the cross

The whole world and everyone in it are less than that which Christ knew of man and shared with man; having known all he can bring all back to his Father. But did he not say that he had given us an example in order that we may follow him, are we not also called to share, not only in such knowledge as the apostles had of him, but in the very life of Christ? When we receive communion in the Holy Eucharist, do we not pledge ourselves to share his human destiny as we ask to share his eternal destiny? To receive Communion surely implies the request for fellowship of life; is it not with the whole Christ that we are to enter into communion? Or shall we have the audacity to say: 'Lord, the Cross for you, the glory for me! You are dead, Lord, and I do not wish to share your cross, but I do wish to share your eternal life'.

Remember the passage in the gospel when James and John came to the Lord and asked to sit on the right hand and on the left of his throne in the day of his glory. Christ had just been speaking to them about his coming Passion; he had described it with a number of tragic details, and had concluded by saying: 'And on the third day the son of man will rise again'. And here were these two disciples who had only heard the promise of victory! They had forgotten, they had not even noticed the price of this victory. Christ had said that the son of man would be delivered into the hands of men, that he would suffer all that is revealed to us in the Passion; they never noticed that, they were only looking for his victory and for what they themselves would be able to gain by it. But Christ turns to them and says: 'Are you ready to be baptised with my baptism?' — in modern terms, (the word baptism in Greek means a total immersion) —'Are you ready to be plunged into the horror in which I am going to be plunged, are you ready to drink the cup that I am going to drink?' They reply: 'Yes, Lord', and what does he promise them? He promises that it will be given to them to be plunged into the same horror, the same death-agony as his, for the salvation of the world, to drink to the dregs the cup that he also is going to drink. He himself is faithful, there is no need for him to promise fidelity to us, we are sure of it, the question concerns our own fidelity: 'Are you ready to be faithful to the friendship that you declare, to the love that you profess for me, to the point of sharing everything? ' And whoever of us comes to the holy table to break the bread and share the Lord's cup must be ready to share not only the splendor of his eternity but also the whole of his earthly destiny, and for what? for the salvation of the world, that others may be saved, because others will only believe in this salvation if they see the divine love shining through the disciples of Christ; they will only believe in it if they see it really crucified, given and victorious: 'Father, forgive them, they know not what they do'.

In the sixth chapter of the Book of Isaiah, we see the prophet brought face to face with a vision of God, and God looking over the whole world in need of salvation, cries: 'Whom shall I send?', and Isaiah rises and says: 'Here am I, Lord, send me'. Hundreds of years later, the archangel Gabriel stands before the Virgin of Israel and tells her that the time has come for the one Job was waiting for to enter into the history of the world, in order to be living intercession, to be the intercessor par excellence. And the Virgin replies: 'Here I am, I am the handmaid of the Lord, be it unto me according to his will'. Shall we not reply, in our turn, in the same way? Dare we be content to present God with requests for the good of others? Shall we not hear the Lord saying to us: 'Whom shall I send?' and shall we not reply: 'Here I am, Lord, send me?'.

To take upon ourselves the cross of forgiveness

Intercession begins with this act of involvement, it continues by fidelity; to be baptised with the baptism of Christ, to drink his cup, is not simply one moment of communion: it is a definitive communion, a fellowship of life accepted forever. So many examples are a proof of this and the victory of God by love and charity is so obvious when it shows itself! I will give one or two examples. Immediately after the war a German newspaper published a deeply moving document: the copy of a prayer found in a concentration camp, written on a torn scrap of wrapping paper. Briefly this was the essence of the prayer: 'Lord, when you come to judge the quick and the dead, remember not only the men of good will but those of evil will. But in that day let it not be their violence and cruelty that you remember, but those fruits of forgiveness, of companionship, of greatness of soul that we have borne because of the sufferings that they inflicted on us, and let these fruits be their pardon!' Father, forgive them for they know not what they do.

A man I knew returned, having, also spent several years in a concentration camp. I met him in a street in Paris and asked him: 'What have you brought back from the camp?' 'Anguish', he replied. '"Why, have you lost your faith?' I said. 'No', he answered 'but you see, while I was in the camp, the object of violence, of ill-treatment, of cruelty, expecting a violent death at every moment, I could say: Father, forgive then, and I was sure that God must forgive them because I had the right to ask His forgiveness, for I was the innocent victim of their violence. Now I am free and perhaps they have not understood, they are still in their hatred and folly. And when I ask God for their salvation anguish seizes me: What proof can I bring to God to show that my prayer is sincere? I no longer suffer'. Father, forgive them, they know not what they do,— a prayer under-girded by an act.

We are not all in such extreme situations as those I have described, but all of us, at every moment, can take upon ourselves the cross of forgiveness. In all our human relationships, at every moment, our heart shrinks and we withdraw from our neighbour because he has wounded us, offended us, forgotten us, rejected us. We are free to open ourselves and to offer ourselves. At the very moment that we are innocent victims, we receive from God that power which is properly divine, of pardoning in his name. And the pardon does not begin at the moment when the suffering ceases, and little by little is forgotten. Pardon begins at the moment when the victim of injustice or violence turns to the aggressor and says: 'I accept you as you are, I accept you as a danger of death, I accept you as a projection of hatred, and I take you up as Christ took up his cross, the instrument of suffering and death, and I will carry you to the end!' It is there that forgiveness begins and that our intercession begins, and in the easy situations in which almost all of us live, we can carry it out from hour to hour in refusing hatred, in refusing to be offended, in refusing to be humiliated, in refusing to be rejected, in saying; 'Whatever you do, I accept you', and then we can raise to God a prayer of intercession. And sometimes this prayer of intercession can be like that of the holy Virgin at Cana.

Opening a door to Christ

The only thing she said, and which in the event was decisive, was not that she recalled to Christ the need and hope of those who were surrounding him, it was the moment when, in an act of perfect faith, without limits, she turned to the servants and said: 'Whatever he says, do it'. She created the conditions of the kingdom of God by her act of faith which brought into that act of faith those who were still on the fringes in comparison with the perfect faith that was hers, and because she was able to believe, God was free to act. And that also is something we can do, we are all free to do it, we are all in a condition to do it. Each of us can be the one who, in a situation of tension, in a tempest, in a squall, in a confrontation, conscious of being able to do nothing, takes his stand in prayer and says: 'Lord, come! May your presence bring peace, give us that peace which the world cannot give, bless those who hate each other, give them the peace which can conquer all hatred.' Our role is to open a door to Christ; wherever there is a Christian, wherever there is a Christian community, God can be present: Christ and the Spirit, the humble frail, vulnerable All-Mightiness of this God who willed to become one of us in order that we might grow to the measure of his divinity.

Such is the Intercession that we can offer, we Christians, we modern men. An intercession which is first of all and primarily a commitment, a commitment that is total, without reserve, definitive and forever, in a solidarity that nothing will be able to break, neither the cross, nor death, nor the hatred of men, nor the loss of God. And it is an intercession that we can offer without fear of being misunderstood by a God who knows the whole mystery of commitment, of solidarity, of the anguish on the Mount of Olives, of the dereliction of the cross and of the descent into the depths of hell. Such a God as this – we can not only believe in him, we can not only hope in him, we can respect him: he is worthy of our respect, he is a God to whom we can address our prayer of intercession because he has lived the involvement of intercession far more than any one of us; we live it through sympathy but he lived it out in life and death. He has overcome and in his resurrection he witnesses to the victory which is God's and which is also ours, because the victory of God is our salvation. Amen.



* Sourozh. 1980 N.1. P. 22-33

Sunday, 25 August 2013

Γέροντας Παΐσιος: Αν καλοπερνάς δεν σε κάνει καρδιά και… να πεθάνεις!!!


Διονυσιάτης ιερομόναχος επισκέφτηκε τον π. Παΐσιο, όταν πλέον η ασθένεια του Γέροντα βρισκόταν στο αποκορύφωμά της για να τον παροτρύνει να πάει σε γιατρό. Μην ξεχνάμε πως η άσκηση και ο πόνος συνόδευαν ισοβίως τον Γέροντα.Υπέφερε, πονούσε, λοιπόν, πολύ ο Γέροντας και ο ιερομόναχος τον ρώτησε :
-Γέροντα εσείς είπατε πως όταν χρειάζεται να καταφεύγουμε στους γιατρούς. Τώρα εσείς γιατί δεν πηγαίνετε σε γιατρό;
-Καλά, του λέει ο Γέροντας, δεν είπα και ανάθεμα αν δεν πάει κάποιος σε γιατρό! Βρε ευλογημένε, σκέψου: πώς θα πάω εκεί επάνω-εννοώντας την Βασιλεία του Θεού- χωρίς να πονέσω, να δοκιμαστώ, να κακοπαθήσω;
Θα είμαι τελείως άγνωστος εκεί, γιατί εκεί κανείς δεν θα είναι που να μην πόνεσε, είτε με ασθένεια , είτε με εκούσια άσκηση.
Πρέπει να ζούμε με τέτοια κακοπάθεια που να προτιμούμε να φύγουμε απ΄αυτήν την ζωή, γιατί αλλιώς-εδώ που τα λέμε παπά μου μεταξύ μας -αν καλοπερνάς, μετά δεν σε κάνει καρδιά και να πεθάνεις(!), συνέχισε ο Γέροντας!
Αμέσως μετά λέει στον Ιερομόναχο: Είπα και εγώ παπά μου τι θα μου πεις. Για σκέψου: πόσος πόνος και θλίψεις, πόσες δοκιμασίες και πειρασμούς έχουν οι άνθρωποι που έρχονται εδώ, πόσο κόπο και έξοδα κάνουν φτωχοί άνθρωποι για φτάσουν μέχρι εδώ και να βρουν το καλύβι μου κλειστό, γιατί έχω πάει εγώ να φροντίσω τον εαυτό μου;….
Ο Γέροντας (όπως αναφέρουν και τα πνευματικά του τέκνα) το μόνο που ζητούσε με ένταση από τον Θεό ήταν να βοηθά τους τούς πάσχοντες αδελφούς που δεν σταματούσαν να προσέρχονται ζητώντας βοήθεια.
Πώς να μην συγκινηθεί μετά ο καλός Θεός και να μην εισακούει τις προσευχές του; Αλήθεια, αγαπητοί αναγνώστες, πόσο πρέπει να μας παραδειγματίζει και εμάς η θυσία αγάπης και προσφοράς του Γέροντα για τους αδελφούς…
Αναρωτηθήκαμε αν εμείς με την σειρά μας θυσιάζουμε κάτι από το χρόνο μας, από την καλοπέρασή μας, για την αγάπη των αδελφών μας και πόσο προστρέχουμε στις ανάγκες τους; Μακάρι να το πράττουμε για την δόξα του Θεού και τη δική μας σωτηρία.

πηγή:oparadeisos

Saint Theophylact of Ochrid-Ninth Sunday after Pentecost, Jesus Walking on the Water

 Ninth Sunday after Pentecost
Jesus Walking on the Water

Matthew 14:22-34

From The Explanation of the Gospel of St. Matthew

by Blessed Theophylact, Archbishop of Ochrid and Bulgaria

22. And straightway Jesus constrained His disciples to get into a boat, and to go before Him unto the other side, while He sent the multitudes away. By saying constrained, Matthew suggests how inseparable the disciples were from Jesus, for they wanted to be with Him at all times. He sends the multitudes away, not wishing to draw them after Him lest He appear to vaunt in His powers.
23-24. And when He had sent the multitudes away, He went up onto a mountain apart to pray: and when the evening was come, He was there alone. But the boat was now in the midst of the sea, tossed with waves: for the wind was contrary. He went up on the mountain to show that we should pray in an undistracted manner; everything He did was for our sake as He Himself had no need of prayer. He prayed on into the evening, teaching us not to cease praying after a short time, and also to pray especially at night, for it is very quiet then. He permits the disciples to be caught in a storm, so that they might learn to endure trials bravely and know His power. The boat was out in the very middle of the sea so that their fear would be greater.
25-27. And in the fourth watch of the night Jesus went unto them, walking on the sea. And when the disciples saw Him walking on the sea, they were troubled, saying, It is a spirit; and they cried out for fear. But straightway Jesus spake unto them, saying, Take courage; it is I; be not afraid. He did not appear immediately to them to calm the storm, but at the fourth watch, [that is, as the night was coming to its end], teaching us not to ask for a swift solution to our misfortunes but to endure them bravely. The night was divided into four parts by soldiers who stood guard in shifts, each "watch" lasting three hours. So then, sometime after the ninth hour of the night, the Lord appeared to them as God, walking on the water. But they thought it was a phantom, so extraordinary and strange was the sight. For they did not recognize Him by figure, because it was night and because of fear. He first strengthens their resolve by saying: "It is I Who can do all things; take courage."
28. And Peter answered Him and said, Lord, if it be Thou, bid me come unto Thee on the water. As Peter had the most fervent love for Christ, he desires immediately, before the others, to be near Him. For he believes not only that Jesus Himself walks on the water, but that He will grant this to him as well. Peter did not say, "Bid me to walk," but rather to come unto Thee. The former would have been ostentation; the latter is love for Christ.
29-30. And He said, Come. And when Peter was come down out of the boat, he walked on the water, to go to Jesus. But when he saw the mighty wind, he was afraid; and beginning to sink, he cried out, saying, Lord, save me. The Lord laid the sea down beneath Peter's feet, revealing His power. See how Peter prevailed over that which was greater, the sea, but was afraid of the lesser peril, the wind; such is the weakness of human nature. And it was as soon as he became afraid that he began to sink. When his faith weakened, then he went down. The Lord did this so that Peter would not become puffed up, and to console the other disciples who perhaps envied him. Whereupon Christ also showed how much greater He was than Peter.
31-33. And immediately Jesus stretched forth His hand, and caught him, and said unto him, O thou of little faith, of what didst thou doubt? And when they were come into the boat, the wind ceased. Then they that were in the boat came and worshipped Him, saying, Of a truth Thou art the Son of God. Showing that the cause of his sinking was not the wind but faintheartedness, Christ does not rebuke the wind, but the fainthearted Peter. This is why He raised him up and set him on the water, but allowed the wind to blow. Peter did not doubt in everything, but in part. Inasmuch as he was afraid, he showed lack of faith; but by crying out, Lord, save me, he was healed of his unbelief. This is why he hears the words, O thou of little faith, and not "O thou of no faith." Those in the boat were also delivered from fear, for the wind ceased. And then indeed, recognizing Jesus by these things, they confessed His divinity. For it is not an attribute of man to walk on the sea, but of God, as David says, In the sea are Thy byways, and Thy paths in many waters [Ps. 76:19]. The spiritual meaning of the miracle is this: the boat is the earth; the waves, man's life troubled by evil spirits; the night, ignorance. In the fourth watch, that is, at the end of the ages, Christ appeared. The first watch was the covenant with Abraham; the second, the law of Moses; the third, the prophets; and the fourth, the coming of Christ. For He saved those who were drowning when He came and was with us so that we might know and worship Him as God. See also how Peter's later denial, return, and repentance were prefigured by what happened to him here on the sea. Just as there he says boldly, "I will not deny Thee", so here he says, Bid me come unto Thee on the water. And just as then he was permitted to deny, so now he was permitted to sink. Here the Lord gives His hand to him and does not let Him drown, and there, by Peter's repentance, Christ drew him out of the abyss of denial.
34-36. And when they had crossed over, they came to the land of Gennesaret. And when the men of that place had knowledge of Him, they sent out into all that country round about, and brought unto Him all that were diseased; and besought Him that they might only touch the hem of His garment: and as many as touched were made perfectly whole. Jesus stayed for some time in Gennesaret, and the people recognized Him not only by sight but by the signs which He worked, and they showed fervent faith. So much so that they even desired to touch the hem of His garment, and indeed, when they did so, they were healed. You also, O reader, touch the edge of Christ's garment, which is the end of His sojourning in the flesh. For if you believe that He ascended, you will be saved. The garment means His flesh, and its hem, the end of His life on earth.

ΜΗ ΔΙΚΑΙΟΛΟΓΕΙΣ ΤΗΝ ΑΔΡΑΝΕΙΑ ΣΟΥ


Του Αγίου Ιωάννου Χρυσοστόμου

Δεν υπάρχει πιο κρύο πράγμα από τον χριστιανό που δεν σώζει άλλους. Δεν μπορείς εδώ να επικαλεσθείς την φτώχια, διότι θα σε κατηγορήσει η χήρα που κατέβαλε τα δύο λεπτά... Δεν μπορείς να επικαλεστείς την ταπεινή σου καταγωγή, διότι και οι απόστολοι ήταν άσημοι και κατάγονταν από ασήμους. Δεν μπορείς να προβάλεις την αγραμματοσύνη σου κι εκείνοι ήταν αγράμματοι.
Ακόμη κι αν είσαι δούλος, κι αν είσαι δραπέτης, θα μπορέσεις να εκπληρώσεις το καθήκον σου, διότι και ο Ονήσιμος τέτοιος ήταν. Κοίταξε όμως που τον καλεί και σε τι υψηλό αξίωμα τον ανεβάζει ο απόστολος «ίνα κοινωνή μοι», λέγει, «εν τοις δεσμοίς μου». Δεν μπορείς να προφασισθείς την ασθένεια, διότι και ο Τιμόθεος τέτοιος ήταν, είχε «πυκνάς ασθενείας»...
Δεν βλέπετε τα δένδρα τα άκαρπα πως είναι γερά, πως είναι ωραία, μεγάλα, λεία και ψηλά; Αλλά αν είχαμε κήπο, θα προτιμούσαμε να έχουμε ροδιές και ελιές καρποφόρες παρά αυτά, διότι αυτά είναι για την τέρψη και όχι για την ωφέλειά μας ελάχιστα ωφελούν. Τέτοιοι είναι οι χριστιανοί που φροντίζουν μόνο για τα δικά τους, η μάλλον ούτε τέτοιοι, διότι αυτοί είναι για την φωτιά, ενώ τα καλλωπιστικά δένδρα χρησιμοποιούνται και για την οικοδόμηση και για την ασφάλεια των ιδιοκτητών.
Τέτοιες ήταν και οι πέντε παρθένες, αγνές βέβαια και κόσμιες και σώφρονες, αλλά σε κανέναν χρήσιμες, γι' αυτό και κατακαίονται. Τέτοιοι είναι αυτοί που δεν έθρεψαν τον Χριστό. Πρόσεξε ότι κανείς απ' αυτούς δεν κατηγορείται για προσωπικά του αμαρτήματα δεν κατηγορείται ότι πόρνευσε ούτε ότι επιόρκησε, καθόλου, αλλά ότι δεν υπήρξε χρήσιμος στον άλλο... Πως είναι χριστιανός τέτοιος άνθρωπος;
Πες μου, αν το προζύμι που ανακατεύεται με το αλεύρι δεν μεταβάλλει στη δική του φύση όλο το φύραμα, είναι προζύμι; Και αλήθεια, το μύρο που δεν γεμίζει ευωδιά εκείνους που πλησιάζουν θα το ονομάζαμε μύρο;
Μην πεις μου είναι αδύνατο να παρακινήσω άλλους. Αν πράγματι είσαι Χριστιανός, αδύνατο είναι το να μη συμβαίνει αυτό. Όπως αυτά που βλέπουμε στη φύση είναι αναντίρρητα, έτσι και τούτο διότι στη φύση του Χριστιανού βρίσκεται το πράγμα. Μην υβρίζεις τον Θεό. Αν πεις ότι δεν μπορεί να φωτίζει ο ήλιος, τον ύβρισες αν πεις ότι ο Χριστιανός δεν μπορεί να ωφελεί, ύβρισες τον Θεό και τον είπες ψεύτη. Διότι είναι ευκολότερο να μη θερμαίνει και να μη χύνει φως ο ήλιος, παρά να μη φωτίζει ο χριστιανός είναι ευκολότερο να γίνει σκοτάδι το φως, παρά να συμβεί αυτό. Μη λες, λοιπόν, είναι αδύνατο, διότι αδύνατο είναι το αντίθετο. Μην υβρίζεις, λοιπόν, τον Θεό.
Αν ρυθμίσουμε σωστά τη ζωή μας, οπωσδήποτε θα συμβούν κι εκείνα και θα ακολουθήσουν σαν κάτι το φυσικό. Δεν είναι δυνατόν να μείνει κρυφό το φως του Χριστιανού δεν είναι δυνατόν να κρυφτεί μια τόσο φωτεινή λαμπάδα. Ας μην αμελούμε, λοιπόν!

Saturday, 24 August 2013

Saint Gregory Of Sinai - How to Master the Intellect in Prayer



HOW TO MASTER THE INTELLECT IN PRAYER

No one can master the intellect unless he himself is mastered by the Spirit. For the intellect is uncontrollable, not because it is by nature ever-active, but because through our continual remissness it has been given over to distraction and has become used to that. When we violated the commandments of Him who in baptism regenerates us we separated ourselves from God and lost our conscious awareness of Him and our union with Him.
-- Sundered from that union and estranged from God, the intellect is led captive everywhere; and it cannot regain its stability unless it submits to God and is stilled by Him, joyfully uniting with Him through unceasing and diligent prayer and through noetically confessing all our lapses to Him each day. God immediately forgives everything to those who ask forgiveness in a spirit of humility and contrition and who ceaselessly invoke His holy name. As the Psalmist says, "Confess to the Lord and call upon His holy name" (Psalms 105:1).

-- Holding the breath also helps to stabilize the intellect, but only temporarily, for after a little it lapses into distraction again. But when prayer is activated, then it really does keep the intellect in its presence, and it gladdens it and frees it from captivity. But it may sometimes happen that the intellect, rooted in the heart, is praying, yet the mind wanders and gives its attention to other things; for the mind is brought under control only in those who have been made perfect by the Holy Spirit and who have attained a state of total concentration upon Christ Jesus.


HOW TO EXPEL THOUGHTS

-- In the case of a beginner in the art of spiritual warfare, God alone can expel thoughts, for it is only those strong in such warfare who are in a position to wrestle with them and banish them. Yet even they do not achieve this by themselves, but they fight against them with God's assistance, clothed in the armor of His grace.

-- So when thoughts invade you, in place of weapons call on the Lord Jesus frequently and persistently and then they will retreat; for they cannot bear the warmth produced in the heart by prayer and they flee as if scorched by fire. St. John Climacus tells us, "Lash your enemies with the name of Jesus," because God is a fire that cauterizes wickedness (Deuteronomy 4:24 and Hebrews 12:29). The Lord is prompt to help, and will speedily come to the defense of those who wholeheartedly call on Him day and night (Luke 18:7).

-- But if prayer is not yet activated in you, you can put these thoughts to flight in another manner, by imitating Moses (Exodus 17:11-12): rise up, lift hands and eyes to heaven, and God will rout them. Then sit down again and begin to pray resolutely. This is what you should do if you have not yet acquired the power of prayer.

-- Yet even if prayer is activated in you and you are attacked by the more obdurate and grievous of the bodily passions -- namely, listlessness and lust -- you should sometimes rise up and lift your hands for help against them. But you should do this only seldom, and then sit down again, for there is a danger of the enemy deluding you by showing you some illusory form of the truth. For only in those who are pure and perfect does God keep the intellect steadfast and intact wherever it is, whether above or below, or in the heart.


from The Philokalia: Volume IV, edited and translated by G. E. H. Palmer, Philip Sherrard, and Bishop Kallistos Ware, (London: Faber and Faber, 1995), pp. 276 - 278.
Related Posts Plugin for WordPress, Blogger...